Image: Model of dinosaur leg
Renzo Gostoli  /  AP
Geologist Ismar de Souza Carvalho shows a model of a leg from a Maniraptoran dinosaur to journalists at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro on Thursday.
updated 5/19/2006 11:30:44 PM ET 2006-05-20T03:30:44

A dinosaur claw fossil found in Brazil reinforces the theory of an evolutionary link between dinosaurs and birds, a new study says.

Brazilian scientists dubbed the dinosaur the dino-bird, which they said was found in Minas Gerais state, about 370 miles (600 kilometers) northwest of Rio.

Ismar de Souza Carvalho, a co-author of the study, said Thursday that it likely belonged to an unknown group of dinosaurs that walked the earth some 70 million years ago.

“The anatomic structure of this claw shows, quite possibly, the link between carnivore dinosaurs and birds that exist today,” said Carvalho, a member of the Paleontological Investigation Center at Minas Gerais state university.

One expert not involved in the study said that while the theory of a link between dinosaurs and birds has gained acceptance, he expressed doubt that a claw fragment could prove the existence of a previously unknown dinosaur.

“If this claw was all that was found, then it would be rather extravagant to create an elaborate theory based upon it. This claw doesn’t add particularly much to our knowledge of the origins of birds, but it does show that raptor dinosaurs were present in Brazil toward the end of the age of dinosaurs,” Thomas R. Holtz, Jr., a vertebrate paleontologist at the University of Maryland, said Friday.

“The claw is similar in shape to that of many other raptors, such as velociraptors. But from there we can’t infer it is likely a similar dinosaur.”

The Brazilian findings were published in the magazine of the Argentine Natural Science Museum.

© 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


Discussion comments


Most active discussions

  1. votes comments
  2. votes comments
  3. votes comments
  4. votes comments