WASHINGTON — The House on Friday rejected a timetable for pulling U.S. forces out of Iraq after a ferociously partisan debate, forcing lawmakers in both parties to go on record on a major issue in re-election campaigns nationwide.
A day after the Senate took the same position against troop withdrawal, the GOP-led House voted 256-153 to approve a nonbinding resolution that says an “arbitrary date for the withdrawal or redeployment” of American forces is not in the national interest.
“Achieving victory is our only option,” declared House Majority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, casting Democrats as defeatists who want to retreat in the face of terrorist threats. “We must not shy away.”
“’Stay the course’ is not a strategy, it’s a slogan,” answered House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi as she called for a new direction in a war she labeled “a grotesque mistake.”
“It’s time to face the facts,” Pelosi said.
Midterm elections looming
Angling for political advantage, House Republicans engineered the debate and vote, four and one-half months before midterm elections that will decide who runs Congress — and as polls show voters favoring Democrats to replace Republicans as the controlling party.
Those same polls show the public increasingly frustrated with the war as the death toll and price tag continue to rise. Voters could hold it against incumbent candidates, regardless of political party, come November.
Republicans across Capitol Hill are sensitive to those political realities.
GOP leaders in both the House and Senate sought to put lawmakers of both parties, and particularly Democrats, on record on the conflict, and looked to draw attention to deep Democratic divisions on the war.
Senate Republicans succeeded in doing that Thursday. In a maneuver Democrats assailed as a political stunt, GOP leaders brought up legislation calling for withdrawing combat troops by year’s end and quickly dismissed it on a 93-6 vote. Six Democrats were in the minority.
It was the House Republicans’ turn a day later.
Other political news of note
Paul says his economic plan is the only hope for depressed areas such as Detroit
Sen. Rand Paul, a possible contender for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination, said Sunday that his plan to spur job creation in high unemployment areas is the only politically viable plan to help depressed cities, with Detroit as the prime example.
- Mandela biographer says prison ‘crucible’ steeled him and led to victory
- Clinton: Mandela's example 'went way beyond political leadership'
- Obamas to attend memorial service for Mandela
- Fasting for reform: Strikers starve over immigration
- Paul says his economic plan is the only hope for depressed areas such as Detroit
They scheduled a vote on their symbolic resolution that also praises U.S. troops and labels the Iraq war part of the larger global fight against terrorism.
Dems: ‘Failed policy’ in Iraq
Democrats denounced the GOP-orchestrated debate and vote as a politically motivated charade, and most, including Pelosi, voted against the measure. They said that supporting it would have the effect of affirming Bush’s “failed policy” in Iraq.
Still, 42 Democrats broke ranks and joined with all but three Republicans to support the resolution. Two Republicans and three Democrats declined to take a position by voting present.
Balking carried a risk for Democrats, particularly when they see an opportunity to win back control of Congress from the GOP, because Republicans were expected to use Democratic “no” votes to claim that their opponents don’t support U.S. troops.
Sure enough, within two hours of the House vote, the Republican Senate campaign committee circulated news releases that said Rep. Harold Ford Jr., a Democrat running for an open Senate seat in Tennessee, and Rep. Sherrod Brown, a Democrat challenging Sen. Mike DeWine in Ohio, voted to “cut and run” from Iraq.
Lawmakers were mindful of the political implications of the votes throughout the debate that ran more than 12 hours over two days.
Some GOP called resolution weak, incomplete
In floor speeches, several GOP incumbents who face tough challenges from Democrats in November tried to strike a balance. They carefully criticized the resolution that their leaders had written, calling it weak and incomplete, but then reluctantly voted in favor of it.
“The American people are looking to us to answer their questions on how much progress is being made, what are the Iraqis themselves willing to do to fight for their freedom and when will our men and women come home,” Rep. Jim Gerlach, R-Pa., said.
Rep. Vic Snyder, D-Ark., agreed, saying: “We should be having a debate and a discussion on how we will prevail, not just that we want to prevail.”
Republicans and Democrats alike explained the decision, as each side saw it, that confronts voters.
“The choice for the American people is clear; don’t run in the face of danger, victory will be our exit strategy,” Rep. Mike Conaway, R-Texas, said.
Countered Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa.: “It’s not a matter of stay the course. It’s a matter of change direction.”
© 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.