NEW YORK — Some physicists are creating a revolution in the arcane world of ultra-precise clocks. And among them is a researcher who has trouble getting anywhere on time.
"I do tend to be a little bit late," said Jim Bergquist, 58. "Quite a bit late."
Of course, the time he focuses on professionally is far removed from the world of dinner dates and planes to catch.
Bergquist, who is with the National Institute of Standards and Technology in Boulder, Colo., works with extremely accurate devices that rely on the behavior of atoms to measure time. In fact, he is working on what could be the world's most accurate such timepiece.
In Bergquist's world, a 10-billionth of a second is just too long a time between ticks of a clock. And it really makes a difference that a clock in mile-high Denver ticks faster than another at sea level. (Time itself passes more quickly when gravity is reduced.)
In his line of work, the focus isn't on producing the highly accurate clocks that report the official time of the world. It's on producing the even-more-precise devices that are used to judge the accuracy of those clocks.
Such devices are also used to sharpen interplanetary navigation. Ultimately, they should also help reveal fundamental secrets of the universe, and perhaps help in sending secure information over the Internet.
The new way is so accurate that Bergquist believes it will probably make scientists redefine just what a second is.
This summer, Bergquist and colleagues published a head-to-head comparison of the nation's standard ultra-precise clock with the new technology he and others have been pursuing. The results were pretty clear.
The current standard clock will neither gain nor lose a second in 70 million years. The new clock pushes that figure out to 400 million years.
Bergquist figures that with further development, the new technology will become at least 100 times as accurate as the standard kind of clock could ever be.
The secret of the new clock? It "ticks" faster than the standard one. And the more ticks per unit of time, the more precisely that unit can be measured.
Think of trying to time a 100-yard dash: If your clock ticks only once per second, Bergquist said, it will be hard to determine the winner if the race comes down to a hundredth of a second. But a stopwatch that ticks every one-thousandth of a second will do the job.
In fact, Bergquist's device is more like a stopwatch than a clock. It is turned on only intermittently to measure particular intervals of time, rather than being left on continuously to reveal the time of day.
The new clock technology may not only displace the old, but it may also force a revision in what physicists regard as the definition of one second. The current definition, like the ultra-precise clocks now in use, is based on microwaves and the behavior of a cesium atom.
The nucleus of a cesium atom switches back and forth between two physical states when it is hit with microwave radiation of a particular frequency. That frequency is the "tick" of current clocks. One second, to physicists, is 9,192,631,770 such ticks.
The new "optical" clocks instead hit an atom with a laser beam, finely tuned to a certain frequency. Laser "ticks" come about 100,000 times faster, and thus could become the new basis for the definition of a second.
That won't happen right away. Bergquist figures it will take five or 10 years for scientists to decide on the best kind of atom to use in the heart of the optical clocks.
After scientists make that choice, Bergquist said, international politics will come into play as nations weigh the costs of discarding cesium clocks in favor of the more expensive optical ones.
Alan Madej, senior researcher at Canada's Institute for National Measurement Standards in Ottawa, agrees that optical clocks will eventually become the standard for defining a second, though it may take a decade or more. His lab is among the half-dozen or so around the world that work on the cutting edge of the technology.
He noted that as recently as five years ago, official timekeepers around the globe thought optical clocks had potential, but they still clung to the standard microwave technology for technical reasons.
But since then, they have seen "the incredible performance" of the optical devices, he said, and "they now realize it's the way to go."
© 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.