IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.

Report pushes back timeline on Foley conduct

A Republican member of Congress confronted then-Rep. Mark Foley about Internet communications with teenagers as early as 2000, according to a report in the Washington Post.
Jim Kolbe
Rep. Jim Kolbe, R-Ariz, speaks at a press conference in Beirut, Lebanon, in this June 2005 file photo. Hussein Malla / Ap File / AP
/ Source: The Associated Press

A Republican member of Congress confronted then-Rep. Mark Foley about his Internet communications with teenagers as early as 2000, according to a newspaper report.

The report in the Washington Post pushes back by at least five years the date when a member of Congress acknowledges learning of the Florida Republican’s questionable behavior toward pages.

It came as the Republican leadership attempted to present a united front on the congressional page scandal that has rocked the GOP a month before midterm elections and put House Speaker Dennis Hastert on shaky ground.

Though Rep. Adam Putnam, R-Fla., insisted Sunday that “the dirty laundry in our conference is gone,” that claim appeared to be premature.

The Washington Post reported Sunday night that Rep. Jim Kolbe, R-Ariz., confronted Foley about his Internet communications with teenagers as early as 2000.

The Post said that a former page showed Kolbe some Internet messages from Foley that had made the page uncomfortable. Kolbe’s press secretary, Korenna Cline, told the Post that a Kolbe staff member advised the page last week to discuss the matter with the clerk of the House.

Hastert and his aides have been criticized for failing to act promptly after receiving warnings about Foley’s questionable electronic communications with pages.

Hastert since has insisted he was not aware of the communications until recently.  But on the day after Foley resigned, New York Rep. Tom Reynolds said he had told Hastert months ago about concerns that Foley had sent inappropriate messages. Reynolds now says he cannot remember exactly when he learned of Foley’s e-mails or when he told Hastert about them.

Reynolds is facing a tough re-election fight against Democrat Jack Davis. Reynolds has been criticized by Democrats who say he did too little to protect a male teenage page from Foley who resigned Sept. 29 after disclosure of his inappropriate electronic messages to former congressional pages. Foley is now under investigation by federal and Florida authorities.

Putnam, who heads the Republican Policy Committee, sought to make the case that Hastert’s office “acted proactively, they acted aggressively, and within hours of the explicit e-mails coming to light, they demanded Foley’s resignation.”

The House ethics committee is investigating the matter. If it finds evidence of a cover-up, the punishment could range from a mild rebuke in a committee report to a House vote of censure or expulsion.

Rep. Patrick McHenry, R-N.C., said Democrats should be investigated to see whether they leaked the explicit e-mails to gain a political advantage before the elections, although the lawmaker acknowledged he had no evidence indicating that was the case.

Responded Rep. Charles Rangel, D-N.Y.: “I think it’s ridiculous. But if I was in a bind, as the Republicans are now, I guess I would be reaching for straws. But it’s sad.”

Hastert, R-Ill., last week tried to blame the Democrats and the news media for leaking the story but then accepted responsibility. He’s resisted pressure to resign his speaker’s post over his handling of the scandal.

“There’s been a lot of ducking and dodging and diving and weaving,” said Rep. Ray LaHood, R-Ill. “There is a lot of fingerpointing that had gone on earlier in the week, but I do think people are behind the speaker now.”

Republicans have mixed views on the upcoming elections. “This is going to be the most difficult 30 days in the last 12 years that we’ve been the majority party,” LaHood said. The GOP took power after the 1994 election.

Almost half of Americans surveyed in a recent Associated Press-Ipsos poll said recent disclosures of corruption and scandal will be extremely or very important to their vote.

Also, more than half of those surveyed in a Newsweek poll released this weekend believe Hastert tried to cover up news of Foley’s messages to the pages. That poll gives Democrats the advantage on handling moral values, normally a Republican strong point.