IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.

Planets can form from ‘space lint’

A flurry of lintlike particles discovered swirling around a small, distant star could help explain how minuscule interstellar dust grains clump together to form planets, astronomers say.
This photo from the Hubble Space Telescope shows the disk of fluffy material surrounding a star known as AU Microscopii. The star itself is blotted out by a central occulting disk, and the material stretches much farther than the orbit of Neptune in our own solar system. The white lines superimposed on the image indicate the polarizations of light from different areas of the debris disk.
This photo from the Hubble Space Telescope shows the disk of fluffy material surrounding a star known as AU Microscopii. The star itself is blotted out by a central occulting disk, and the material stretches much farther than the orbit of Neptune in our own solar system. The white lines superimposed on the image indicate the polarizations of light from different areas of the debris disk.Nasa / Esa / Uc Berkeley
/ Source: Space.com

A flurry of lintlike particles discovered swirling around a small, distant star could help explain how minuscule interstellar dust grains clump together to form planets, astronomers say.

"We have seen many seeds of planets and we have seen many planets, but how they go from one to the other is a mystery," said study team member James Graham of the University of California at Berkeley. "These observations help us to fill in that gap."

The newfound fluffy particles are about 10 times larger than interstellar dust grains and about as porous as newly fallen snow, which is composed of about 97 percent air and only 3 percent ice.

Another good comparison is lint from a drying machine, Graham said. The two types of materials have roughly the same porosity and are held together by the same molecular forces.

The space lint was detected in a disk encircling AU Microscopii, a relatively young red dwarf star, just 12 million years old, located 32 light-years from Earth.

Polarized view
The researchers used polarizing filters on the Hubble Space Telescope's Advanced Camera for Surveys to blot out the main portion of AU Microscopii's light so that only light reflected off the star's debris disk was visible.

By examining the reflected starlight, the researchers deduced information about certain properties of the particles, including size and shape.

"The way that light scatters depends on the refractive index of the material … [which] tells you how light rays get bent," Graham explained. The refractive index of a material depends on how porous the material is, and a low value is indicative of porous materials.

Researchers think the fluff was shed when larger, softball-sized objects — also fluffy — collided. Dubbed "parent bodies," these objects are thought to be the precursors to even larger entities which eventually coalesce to form planets.

"Once they exceed softball sizes, they start to become compactified. The vacuum in between the grains get filled with more material," Graham said in a news conference Sunday at the 209th meeting of the American Astronomical Society. "The fact that we see this low porosity means that the parent bodies haven't grown too big."

The "birth ring"
The parent bodies are thought to reside within a tumultuous region located near the center of the star called the "birth ring."

First predicted by astronomers in 2005, the birth ring is thought to extend out to a distance of up to 4.6 billion miles from the star. Within this ring, collisions are more likely to occur and it is in this region that planets are most likely to form.

Crashing parent bodies are thought to shed the fluff, which is then blown outwards by the star's intense solar winds.

The discovery of the fluffy particles could affect astronomers' theories about how planets form, said study team member Paul Kalas, also of Berkeley.

For example, he said, to calculate the mass of a rock with no porosity, scientists cube the value of its radius. But for a porous object, this relationship no longer holds, and mass is a function of the radius squared.

"So let's say you have a theoretician wants to make a model of how everything in the solar system forms," Kalas said. "If he starts off with that basic physics result that mass is proportional to radius cubed, he would get the wrong answer because we're starting from very porous fragments."

Kalas said that future research might focus on whether a similar fluff surrounds other stars.

"It would be interesting to see how this porosity changes with the mass and luminosity of the star," he said.