Skip navigation

‘Anguished’ senators try to find way on Iraq

Lawmakers try to balance opposition to Bush ‘surge’ with support for troops

Troops speak out on Iraq
Jan. 25: Relatives of the men and women who will carry out President Bush’s new plan have their own opinions. They talk to NBC's Donna Gregory at Fort Bragg, N.C.
Military hospital
Jan. 23: NBC's Robert Bazell goes inside a Baghdad emergency room, where U.S. military doctors work every day to save the lives of wounded soldiers.
Slide show
Wolf, 19, of Arlington, Virginia, mourns at the grave of her boyfriend Colin Wolfe of Manassas
  Remembering the fallen
Family and friends remember loved ones who have lost their lives serving in Iraq. Click to view photographs and listen to their stories.

more photos

  Most Popular
Most viewed

As more U.S. forces head to Iraq, senators across the political spectrum denounced President Bush’s plan for a troop “surge” Thursday but were waging a behind-the-scenes battle over how strongly they could afford to confront him.

Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., told NBC News that Democratic and Republican senators were reacting with “anguish” to the dilemma in which they found themselves: how to rebuke Bush for the lack of progress on stemming violence in Iraq without weakening the commander-in-chief in a time of war. A lot of senators, he said, “don’t know how to react.”

The question is not whether the Senate can muster a majority to take Bush to task over the war. The question is how strongly they can word the resolution and still overcome a likely filibuster by supporters of the president and some wavering Republicans, who argue that Congress should take no action that could be seen as abandoning U.S. troops in the field. Overcoming a filibuster would take 60 votes.

“Well, that’s the difficulty. A resolution that says we’re against this escalation is easy,” said Sen. Charles Schumer of New York, a member of the Democratic leadership. “The next step is how do you put further pressure on the administration against the escalation while still supporting the troops who are there right now.”

“And that’s what we’re figuring out,” Schumer said in an interview on NBC’s TODAY show. “But this will not be the end. There will be other resolutions with more teeth in them, and my bet [is] they’ll get a majority of support with significant Republican support.”

Navigating a delicate course
Senate leaders in essence have to thread the needle.

One on side of the equation are liberal Democrats who strongly oppose the war, such as Russ Feingold, D-Wis., who said: “This is not a time for trying to forge a compromise that everybody can be part of. This is a time to stop the needless deaths of American troops.”

Senators torn over Iraq resolution
Jan. 25: A lot of senators want to take President Bush to task but fear the resolution approved this week goes too far. MSNBC's Mike Viqueira reports.

On the other are moderate Democrats and Republicans eager to prove they heard the message of antiwar voters in November while not leaving the troops in the lurch, such as John McCain, R-Ariz., who said, “The goal is to try to salvage this situation and not send the additional troops with a message of disapproval.”

The Senate Foreign Relations Committee voted 12-9 Wednesday for a non-binding resolution opposing Bush’s plan to increase the U.S. commitment in Iraq by as many as 21,500 troops. The resolution is scheduled for a vote in the full Senate next week, but some senators, led by John Warner, R-Va., were pushing a competing resolution that would stop short of outright opposition.

That resolution, which was introduced Monday, would “disagree” with a buildup of U.S. troops while urging Bush to revisit the findings of the bipartisan Iraq Study Group. That option would give undecided senators the chance to chart a middle course, said Larry Sabato, a presidential scholar at the University of Virginia.

“You can say, ‘Well, yes, I’m disagreeing with President Bush, but I’m agreeing with John Warner,’” Sabato told NBC’s Chip Reid.

Bush opponents challenged to propose a better idea
Members of the Foreign Relations Committee who supported the anti-surge resolution said they were confident that they would persuade enough senators to oppose the president’s plan.

“When we get to the floor, I think there will be more Republicans joining us, and I think that the debate will be increasingly important both for the White House to hear as well as the American people,” Sen. Robert Menendez, D-N.J., said in an interview with MSNBC’s Chris Jansing. “This is the least that we can do to send a message to the president that he needs to go back to the drawing board and work with us in a bipartisan effort.”

Sponsored links

Resource guide