updated 6/28/2007 4:09:21 PM ET 2007-06-28T20:09:21

A federal judge overseeing a lawsuit filed by six Muslim men who were removed from a US Airways flight has declined to limit public access to the case.

  1. Don't miss these Travel stories
    1. Lords of the gourd compete for Punkin Chunkin honors

      With teams using more than 100 unique apparatuses to launch globular projectiles a half-mile or more, the 27th annual World Championship Punkin Chunkin event is our pick as November’s Weird Festival of the Month.

    2. Airports, airlines work hard to return your lost items
    3. Expert: Tourist hordes threaten Sistine Chapel's art
    4. MGM Grand wants Las Vegas guests to Stay Well
    5. Report: Airlines collecting $36.1B in fees this year

Omar T. Mohammedi, a New York attorney for the six Muslim scholars, sought to limit media access to court filings and proceedings because he felt some of the coverage of the case has been biased against his clients.

"The Court declines to treat this case in the extraordinary manner that you request," U.S. District Judge Ann Montgomery wrote in a letter dated Tuesday. She added that the public and press have an interest in full access to judicial proceedings under the First Amendment.

The six imams were removed from a US Airways flight in Minneapolis last fall after passengers reported what they thought was suspicious behavior. The imams, who were handcuffed and questioned, claim the airline discriminated against them and violated their civil rights.

"When you think of the media, and the way they have been portraying this case, it has not been very helpful. It has been biased," Mohammedi said. "That has caused a lot of stress, a lot of stress on our clients, as well as made it difficult for us to handle this case ... in a manner that it should be handled."

The complaint seeks an undisclosed amount of money for punitive and compensatory damages. Besides US Airways, the lawsuit names other defendants including the Minnesota Metropolitan Airports Commission, which owns the airport, and John Does, who could later be identified as passengers.

An attorney for US Airways said the airline would not comment.

Mohammedi had wanted the court to remove members of the media from an electronic distribution list, bar members of the media from hearings and hold proceedings in closed session, according to the judge's letter.

Mohammedi said he and his clients have received death threats, partly because of what he called biased coverage by most media outlets. He cited a March 30 Associated Press story that he claimed did not accurately reflect his conversation with a reporter.

The AP story explored whether the lawsuit would discourage future airline travelers from speaking up when they see something unusual. The story included information from Mohammedi, as well as different points of view from security officials and from an attorney who offered to represent passengers who might be named as defendants in the lawsuit.

"We are just asking the media to be balanced and reflect what was said ... and to let justice take its course," Mohammedi said. "I'm asking the media to be a little bit more responsible in reporting the facts of the case. That actually would prevent a lot of issues."

The imams had attended a conference in Minneapolis of the North American Imams Federation, and were heading to Phoenix. Five were from the Phoenix-Tempe area, while one was from Bakersfield, Calif.

The group has said that three of the men said their normal evening prayers in the airport terminal before boarding the plane, and that they entered the aircraft individually, except for one member who is blind and needed a guide. Once on the plane, the men did not sit together.

A passenger raised concerns about the imams through a note passed to a flight attendant. According to officials, witnesses reported some of the imams made anti-American comments about the war in Iraq and that some asked for seat belt extensions even though a flight attendant thought they didn't need them.

© 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


Discussion comments


Most active discussions

  1. votes comments
  2. votes comments
  3. votes comments
  4. votes comments