Vick's treatment fair? What about wife abusers?
Sick but true: Some see dogs as more legitimate victims than women
Columnist in trouble
Aug. 6: A columnist is in trouble after saying NFL quarterback Michael Vick would have been in less trouble if he were accused of rape. Dan Abrams asks attorney Gloria Allred, columnist Mike Bianchi and psychologist Jeff Gardere if the columnist was right.
Pittsburgh sports reporter Paul Zeise took a lot of heat recently and was taken off a television program he regularly appears on for uttering these poorly chosen words:
“It’s really a sad day in this country when somehow Michael Vick would have been better off raping a woman if you look at the outcry of what happened. Had he done that, he probably would have been suspended for four games and he’d be back on the field.”
Pretty rough stuff from Zeise, a writer at the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, who later apologized for his comments.
Recently, MSNBC’s Dan Abrams explored Paul Zeise’s comments and asked what was really offensive – Zeise’s comments or the fact that plays get slaps on the wrist for committing crimes against women?
“Considering the disgusting behavior that a number of NFL players have exhibited against women and the inconsistent punishments for their crimes, Zeise may not be that far off,” Abrams said, citing several NFL players who physically violated and abused the women in their lives and received what amounted to a slap on the wrist. Abrams then asked his guests if Zeise was really that far off. “Does he deserve this sort of public lashing for inartfully stating what appears to be true?”
My answer? Paul Zeise’s insensitive and stupidly-phrased comments in no way discount a larger reality which is this: the Michael Vick story involving the alleged brutal violence against dogs has gotten much more attention than any one of the numerous assault cases against women identified by Dan Abrams or so many others involving with professional athletes that just get swept under the rug. True, some of the media attention around the Michael Vick case involves the fact that Vick is a flashy, talented, and highly visible NFL star. But let’s not kid ourselves. The other part of this story that makes it so salacious is that it is so out of the ordinary. Sadly, it’s a lot more common to hear about a professional athlete who physically violates and/or assaults a woman close to him than it is to hear about a high-profile NFL quarterback allegedly running a dog fighting group that beats, tortures and apparently kills dogs who are not up to par to fight. The other part of the story that makes it so “newsworthy” is the fact that there is graphic video available of dogs fighting, which even if you’re disgusted by, it’s hard not to turn away from.
Consider that too often when a woman accuses a man of beating her, too many Americans don’t accept her version of the facts and often ask, “What’s the rest of the story?” What’s implied are several things: Did she “deserve it”? Did she “initiate it”? What’s the history of the relationship? Is she trying to get back at this guy for something else? Unfortunately, women who are the victims of domestic violence are sometimes not seen as legitimate victims. Dogs have no free will and are brought into this sickening so-called “sport” and trained to kill and ultimately even be killed themselves if their owners no longer see value in them. For some people, the dogs Michael Vick allegedly tortured are seen more bona fide victims than a woman potentially beaten by a professional athlete. Sick but true.
Finally, consider this: There are some people who respect the life of dogs and other animals more than they do other people. Again, sick but true. Bottom line, this isn’t about Paul Zeise. He said something in an offensive and inconsiderate way and went way too far in saying it by including rape, yet his comments ultimately generated a very important public conversation that questions the values of those of us in the news media as well as our larger society.
MORE FROM MSNBC
Add msnbc headlines to your news reader: