IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.

Trial of officer charged over Abu Ghraib nears

The former director of the Abu Ghraib prison’s interrogation center, accused of approving the use of dogs and nudity to intimidate some captives, is the last person charged in the scandal to face a court-martial.
/ Source: The Associated Press

The former director of the Abu Ghraib prison’s interrogation center, accused of approving the use of dogs and nudity to intimidate some captives, is the last person charged in the scandal to face a court-martial.

Army Lt. Col. Steven L. Jordan, due to stand trial Monday at Fort Meade, is the only officer of 12 defendants charged in an investigation triggered by photographs showing low-ranking U.S. soldiers assaulting and humiliating naked detainees at the prison in Iraq in late 2003 and early 2004.

Jordan, who isn’t in any of the pictures, has pleaded not guilty to six charges, which could bring a 16½-year prison sentence if he is convicted.

Prosecutors, led by Lt. Col. John P. Tracy, plan to call witnesses including Maj. Gen. George R. Fay, who investigated the abuses. Fay concluded in his report that Jordan’s tacit approval of violence during a weapons search on Nov. 24, 2003, “set the stage for the abuses that followed for days afterward.”

The weapons search, known as the “roundup,” followed an episode in which a Syrian detainee fired at Jordan and other soldiers with a handgun he had obtained from Iraqi police officers, according to investigative records.

Denies role in interrogations
Jordan’s defense, led by Capt. Samuel Spitzberg, will argue that although he was the titular head of the interrogation center, he spent most of his time trying to improve soldiers’ deplorable living conditions. At a hearing in October, the defense contended that interrogation conditions were set by two other officers: Col. Thomas Pappas, an intelligence brigade commander who was the highest-ranking officer at Abu Ghraib, and Capt. Carolyn Wood, leader of a unit within the interrogation center called the Interrogation Command Element.

Neither Pappas nor Wood has been charged with crimes. Pappas was reprimanded and fined $8,000 for once approving the use of dogs during an interrogation without higher approval.

Kurt Goering, director of research and policy at Amnesty International USA, said the trial could shed light on high-level approval of interrogation tactics tantamount to torture.

“There is quite a bit of evidence to suggest that it goes all the way to President Bush and (former Defense Secretary) Donald Rumsfeld,” Goering said. “There is today, still, a continuing failure to hold these officials at the highest levels responsible.”

Charged with abuse, dereliction of duty
Jordan and lawyers for both sides declined to be interviewed by The Associated Press about the court-martial at Fort Meade, between Washington and Baltimore. Jordan, 51, of Fredericksburg, Va., told The Washington Post last month that he is a scapegoat, considered more expendable because he is a reservist.

Three of the counts Jordan faces refer to the treatment of prisoners: cruelty and maltreatment; dereliction of duty for failing to stop the abuse; and failure to obtain permission to use dogs. But the harshest penalties — totaling 13 years — are for two counts alleging he lied to Fay about his knowledge of abuses and one count alleging he disobeyed the general’s order barring him from discussing Fay’s investigation with others.

Eugene R. Fidell, president of the Washington-based National Institute of Military Justice, said relatively lighter penalties for abusing prisoners should be increased as “a way of sending a signal both within the service and to our friends and others around the world that we treat these matters seriously.”

Eleven enlisted soldiers have been convicted of crimes at Abu Ghraib. The longest prison term was given to former Cpl. Charles Graner Jr., of Uniontown, Pa., who was sentenced in January 2005 to 10 years for assault, battery, conspiracy, maltreatment, indecent acts and dereliction of duty.