Image: Before and after supernova
SDSS / McDonald Observatory / UT-Austin
An image from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, at left, shows the field where SN 2005ap was found, showing four nearby galaxies (A, B, C, and D) in December 2004. At right, an image of the same field, taken by the Hobby-Eberly Telescope about two and a half months later, shows the supernova.
updated 10/11/2007 11:31:38 PM ET 2007-10-12T03:31:38

Robert Quimby has an unusual distinction among astronomers. The Caltech postdoctoral researcher has discovered the two brightest star explosions ever witnessed, within months of each other.

Quimby's latest find is Supernova 2005ap, which at its peak blazed 100 billion times brighter than the sun and was twice as luminous as the previous record holder, a supernova called SN 2006gy, which he also discovered.

Quimby actually discovered SN 2005ap first, but confirmation of the blast's luminosity required follow-up observations that were only recently completed.

"There I was, finding my first supernova. I was just happy to get anything," said Quimby, who was previously at the University of Texas in Austin. "It turned out to be the most luminous supernova ever found."

The SN 2005ap finding will be detailed in the Oct. 20 issue of The Astrophysical Journal Letters.

Like birds, not elephants
SN 2005ap is a so-called Type II supernova, which scientists think typically occurs when the core of a massive star collapses under its own weight, triggering an explosion. However, SN 2005ap was 300 times brighter than average Type II explosions.

Quimby's other discovery, SN 2006gy, emitted more than 50 billion suns' worth of light and took several weeks to dim. It was speculated the parent star of that supernova was a stellar behemoth with about 150 times the mass of the sun, and that the explosion represented a new mechanism involving an exotic antimatter engine that had been theorized but never observed.

Scientists think SN 2005ap was more like typical supernovas because, like other Type II's, it brightened and dimmed over a matter of days.

Slideshow: Space shots "That means the physics [of SN 2005ap] has to be different somehow, but we haven't totally puzzled out the reason why," said J. Craig Wheeler, a member of the discovery team and Quimby's advisor at the University of Texas in Austin.

The team is not sure the exact size of SN 2005ap's parent star, but they estimate it must have been around 10 solar masses.

"We don't have a good number on [the mass]," Wheeler told "But it wasn't a hundred solar masses like the other one or it would have behaved more sedately."

He added, "Elephants just move more sedately than birds."

Quimby discovered SN 2005ap by using telescopes at McDonald Observatory at the University of Texas in Austin and then followed up with observations with the Keck Telescope in Hawaii that were made by Greg Aldering of Lawrence Berkeley National Lab.

The combined observations were enough to determine that SN 2005ap was located 4.7 billion light-years away. The distance was crucial to determining the supernova's luminosity and establishing it as the brightest ever recorded.

Not luck
Quimby said it was hard work and not luck that enabled him to discover two bright supernovas in a row. "I'm searching a huge volume of space, comparable to all previous nearby supernova surveys combined," he said.

Quimby also looked for exploding stars in places other astronomers avoided, such as dwarf galaxies and galaxies with active black holes at their centers.

The new findings could force other supernova seekers to change their searching techniques. "There's no question that [Quimby's results] have gotten everybody's attention," Wheeler said.

The team behind the University of Michigan's Robotic Transient Search Experiment, or ROTSE, is planning to shift gears and begin looking for supernovas in addition to its main target of gamma ray bursts, Wheeler said, and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Supernova Search is also reconsidering its search filters in response to the new discoveries.

© 2013 All rights reserved. More from


Discussion comments


Most active discussions

  1. votes comments
  2. votes comments
  3. votes comments
  4. votes comments