IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.

Kobe case coverage

Here at the Kobe Bryant case, like so many other high-profile cases, we hear again and again about the media circus coming to town. But the implication is that the circus-like atmosphere bleeds into the courtroom, and that’s a myth.
/ Source: msnbc.com

Here at the Kobe Bryant case, like so many other high-profile cases, we hear again and again about the media circus coming to town.

It's true, the media presence was massive-hundreds of reporters from all over the world. But the implication is that the circus-like atmosphere bleeds into the courtroom, and that’s the myth.

You can argue that massive coverage can have some impact on some of the legal decisions, whether a camera is inside the courtroom or not. But it’s not the media or public presence inside the courtroom that does it. After going past security today, the courtroom felt more like a classroom, even a library, than a circus. The testimony loud and clear, hardly a whisper inside.

Even at the O.J. Simpson case, I remember, once you got past the cameras, the crowds and the T-shirt vendors, the courtroom could not have been more orderly. No talking, no eating, no chewing gum, assigned seats. You can argue that in that unique case the lawyers played to the camera, which I think is very rare, but happened there.

But the media and public presence inside didn’t disrupt the proceedings themselves. The elephants, freaks and jugglers just didn’t make it inside, and if they did, they were shown the door quickly. So next time you hear about the media circus, remember, it’s only an outdoor show.