Skip navigation

  Court weighs campus affirmative action cases

Minority districts aren’t working

In the latest Law of Politics piece, Ari examines the Voting Rights Act. Full story

Scalia: Voting Rights Act is a ‘racial preferment’

The conservative jurist called a key part of the law an "embedded" form of "racial preferment." Full story

Holder invokes Dr. King’s spirit, vows to protect voting rights regardless of Supreme Court decision

" I know Dr. King would not yet be satisfied," Holder insisted. "We will not sit by and allow the slow unraveling of an electoral system that so many sacrificed so much to construct." Full story

Sponsored Links

Articles

How to pick a plaintiff: The man who chose Abigail Fisher

Desiline Victor to Justice Scalia: ‘Voting Rights Act is not a racial entitlement’

Voting is no ‘racial entitlement,’ Justice Scalia

On voting, VAWA, and the debt, GOP re-opening issues long thought settled

NBC Politics: Court decision on Voting Rights Act could spur election changes, but not turn back the clock

Analysis: In voting-rights case, liberal justices pitch to Kennedy

NBC Politics: Key provisions of Voting Rights Act appear in jeopardy after high court argument

No, Justice Scalia, the right to vote is not an ‘entitlement’

Supreme Court to weigh ongoing validity of voting rights law

Will the Supreme Court protect voting rights?

Video

  Eric Holder: We will not 'allow the slow unravelling' of our electoral system

Attorney General Eric Holder speaks at the National Action Network Keepers of the Dream Awards about his committment to protect voting rights, especially Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act.

  How the NRA is using 2014 math to squelch gun control reform

MSNBC contributors Jimmy Williams and Dr. James Peterson debate how difficult the NRA’s brand of state-level ground politics is making life for legislators in advance of the 2014 races.

  What did Scalia mean by 'racial entitlement'?

Rachel Maddow explains one suggestion that Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia was referencing his own writing on Affirmative Action when he talked about "perpetuating racial entitlement" during oral arguments about the Voting Rights Act.

  Voting rights 48 years after ‘Bloody Sunday’

Former DNC Communications Director Karen Finney and The Nation’s Ari Melber debate the future of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 in the the wake of the 48th anniversary of the “Bloody Sunday” march in Alabama that inspired it.

  Sideshow: South Carolina’s Sanford saga

SNL takes on the Voting Rights Act challenge, the Mark Sanford saga keeps getting weirder, and the president commits a nerd faux pas.

advertisement | ad info

Related Photos

Rev. Jesse Jackson Sr. greets people in line during a voter's rights rally in front of the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington
Rev. Jesse Jackson Sr. greets people in line during a voter's rights rally in front of the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington

Rev. Jesse Jackson Sr. greets people in line during a voter's rights rally in front of the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington February 27, 2013. The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday will consider whether to strike down a key provision of a federal law designed to protect minority voters. During the one

Rev. Jesse Jackson Sr. attends a voter's rights rally in front of the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington
Rev. Jesse Jackson Sr. attends a voter's rights rally in front of the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington

Rev. Jesse Jackson Sr. attends a voter's rights rally in front of the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington February 27, 2013. The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday will consider whether to strike down a key provision of a federal law designed to protect minority voters. During the one-hour oral argument,

Voting rights activists gather in front of the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington
Voting rights activists gather in front of the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington

Voting rights activists gather in front of the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington February 27, 2013. The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday will consider whether to strike down a key provision of a federal law designed to protect minority voters. During the one-hour oral argument, the nine justices will