updated 12/1/2003 2:55:05 AM ET 2003-12-01T07:55:05

In a decision that could have national implications, the Colorado Supreme Court threw out the state’s new congressional districts Monday because the GOP-led Legislature redrew the maps in violation of the constitution. The General Assembly is required to redraw the maps only after each census and before the ensuing general election — not at any other time, the court said in a closely watched decision. A similar court battle is being waged in Texas.

  1. Other political news of note
    1. Animated Boehner: 'There's nothing complex about the Keystone Pipeline!'

      House Speaker John Boehner became animated Tuesday over the proposed Keystone Pipeline, castigating the Obama administration for not having approved the project yet.

    2. Budget deficits shrinking but set to grow after 2015
    3. Senate readies another volley on unemployment aid
    4. Obama faces Syria standstill
    5. Fluke files to run in California

UNDER THE ruling, Colorado’s seven congressional districts revert to boundaries drawn up by a Denver judge last year after lawmakers failed to agree.

The issue before the court was whether the redistricting map pushed through the Legislature by Republicans this year was illegal. Colorado’s constitution calls for redistricting only once a decade and Democrats contended the task was completed by the judge.

Republicans said the map drawn by the judge was temporary and the law requires redistricting work to be done by the Legislature.

The court rejected that argument, saying: “Because the General Assembly failed to redistrict during this constitutional window, it relinquished its authority to redistrict until after the 2010 census. There is no language empowering the General Assembly to redistrict more frequently or at any other time.”

Republicans now hold five of the state’s seven congressional seats.

Democrats hope to pick up two of those seats if they win the court fight.

State GOP Chairman Ted Halaby had said the case could end up in the U.S. Supreme Court if there are conflicting decisions in Colorado and Texas, which also has a pending court challenge.

“This is the whole ball of wax,” said Tom Downey, an attorney for Colorado Democrats who challenged the Republican-drawn maps.

In the national political picture, Democrats need to gain 12 seats to take control of the 435-member House, an uphill fight in view of state-by-state redistricting in 2001. A GOP redistricting plan in Texas could add to the GOP majority, though that plan is also being challenged in court.

Carl Forti, spokesman for the National Republican Congressional Committee in Washington, said the battle isn’t over because a similar challenge to the Colorado districts is pending in federal court in Denver.

“This was expected. It’s far from over. There’s still a federal case to play out,” Forti said.

Political experts say if the redistricting plans in Colorado and Texas are allowed to stand it could lead to similar changes nationwide.

The battle over the redistricting plan in Texas took months to resolve, as Democratic legislators twice held it up by boycotting legislative sessions.

Texas House Democrats broke a quorum in their chamber, killing the redistricting effort, when they fled to Ardmore, Okla., in May. Senate Democrats fled to Albuquerque, N.M., for the full second special legislative session. The Senate Democrats returned reluctantly after one of their group decided to return to Texas.

Republicans have said they could pick up as many as six additional seats in Texas’ 32-member delegation, which is ruled 17-15 by Democrats. Democrats said the map would add seven Republicans.

© 2003 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Discuss:

Discussion comments

,

Most active discussions

  1. votes comments
  2. votes comments
  3. votes comments
  4. votes comments