Riding on a beam of light, future passenger-carrying spacecraft will look far different than clunky vehicles used today. Test shots of a sub-scale version of this single-seater laser-boosted lightcraft have already been carried out at White Sands, New Mexico test range.
updated 11/26/2003 7:54:19 AM ET 2003-11-26T12:54:19

As the 21st century unfolds, radically different forms of air and space vehicles will replace the clunky machines of today, whisking passengers at ultra-high speed around the Earth and outward into space. Laboratories scattered around the world are delving into novel and exotic forms of propulsion. Breakthrough physics could well make possible ambitious human treks across interstellar distances.
WORK IS UNDERWAY to harness antimatter as a way to shave travel time to the Moon down to minutes, or between Earth and Mars to a day. Meanwhile, laser and microwave technology is rapidly advancing the idea of beaming people and payloads effortlessly into Earth orbit, making fuel-guzzling rocketry look like the horse and buggy of yesteryear.

Nearly 100 years after the epoch-making exploits of the Wright Brothers — the first successful sustained powered flights in a heavier-than-air machine — visionary scientists and engineers see “far-reaching” ways to turn solar system touring into a Sunday drive.

PARADIGM-BUSTING PROPULSIONSpeedy, connect-the-dot travel — leaving Earth for a distant point in space — equates to a lot of groundbreaking work, quite literally. That translates into research dollars let loose to fund new avenues for space travel. Last year, a report to President Bush underscored that very issue.

The need to achieve breakthroughs in propulsion and space power was highlighted by the Commission on the Future of the United States Aerospace Industry, chaired by former Congressman Robert Walker. The blue-ribbon group reported to the president:

“The lengthy transit times that result from the use of currently available propulsion systems make human exploration of our solar system difficult, if not infeasible. While propulsion concepts, such as ion and plasma, and power sources, such as nuclear, offer the potential of cutting transit times for space exploration by half or more — they are unable to significantly reduce the duration of deep-space missions,” the report explained.

“New propulsion concepts based on breakthrough energy sources, such as antimatter energy systems, could result in a new propulsion paradigm that will revolutionize space transportation,” the Commission study advised the President.

A bottom line of the Commission report: “In the nearer-term, nuclear fission and plasma sources should be actively pursued for space applications. In the longer-term, breakthrough energy sources that go beyond our current understanding of physical laws, such as nuclear fusion and antimatter, must be credibly investigated in order for us to practically pursue human exploration of the solar system and beyond. These energy sources should be the topic of a focused basic research effort.”

FUTURISTIC PHYSICSIf you’re casting about for go/no go breakthrough propulsion ideas, you don’t have to look too far. Try boundary-pushing study of Heaviside and Slepian forces, quantum vacuum energy, transient inertia, parametrized post-Newtonian gravity geometry, or deep Dirac energy theory.

Clearly, futuristic physics of flight doesn’t come easy. But this form of mental gymnastics is home turf for Marc Millis of NASA’s John Glenn Research Center in Cleveland, Ohio. Over the last several years, through 2002, he served as project manager for the Breakthrough Propulsion Physics (BPP) Project — a subset of Revolutionary Propulsion Technology work spearheaded at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama.

The BPP effort spent a little over $1.5 million — spread out over seven years — to peer at and peer-review the visionary edge of knowledge. Funding for BPP and the Marshall work, however, was “deferred indefinitely” in 2003, although there’s a glimmer of hope the research will be reinstated in the near future.

“My line in the sand is if the physics isn’t understood completely, then it’s in my camp,” Millis told “If the physics is understood, and it’s a matter of technology,” then it is in other camps.”

Millis said the public is wondering when is NASA going to build Star Trek’s Enterprise and warp drive where nobody else has gone before. His answer is short and sweet.

“This is not in the foreseeable future. Today it is still unknown if such visions are even achievable. But new possibilities continue to emerge from science,” Millis points out. As for any “hot favorites” in what has been studied in the BPP undertaking to date, there aren’t any. “Nor should there be…because that would be premature,” he said.

UNEARTHING DISCOVERIESThe technical goals of the BPP project are straightforward, bracketed in terms of unearthing discoveries in mass, speed, and energy for space travel:

Discover new propulsion methods that eliminate or dramatically reduce the need for propellant.

Discover how to circumvent existing limits to dramatically reduce transit times.

Discover new energy methods to power these propulsion devices.

These goals are the breakthroughs, Millis explained, that are needed to conquer the presently impossible ambition of human interstellar exploration. Moreover, what is space? That too is part of the BPP quest to seek a tangible reaction mass or energy source.

Manipulating spacetime itself, looking into warp drives and wormholes - all in a day’s work for those on the trail of breakthrough propulsion physics. What is of utmost importance, Millis quickly added, is to conduct visionary research in a credible manner.

There are pessimists of the day who assume all of this is now and will be forever impossible, Millis said. “We stand far more to gain by making the attempt than by giving up.”

UNIVERSE: A CALDRON OF FORCESThere are clues to breakthrough physics out there in the Universe at large, Millis said. For example, recent astronomical observations and discussion centers on such items as accelerated expansion and the lingering dark matter problem.

The Universe is a caldron of forces that offer insight into forms of propulsion considered exotic today. “In looking at it from a different perspective, we might see something that others would overlook,” Millis said, be it the whole area of faster-than-light or delving into quantum non-locality entanglement.

“These are things that physicists are observing,” Millis said. So we’re just asking the question: Is this going to be useful for propulsion or not?”

“We are at the pinnacle of our knowledge ... but we always were. That’s the funny thing about pinnacles. They are a momentary illusion that you’ve got everything you know. You are basing that on what you know rather than what you haven’t yet discovered,” Millis said.

Anybody looking outward over the next 100 years to venture a guess as to what space travel breakthroughs will occur deserves hazard pay.

“But we must keep pushing that envelope ... to keep trying to make the impossible possible. If we keep doing that, the future will be interesting. If we don’t, I think the consequences would be fatal,” Millis concluded.

MAKING ANTIMATTER MATTERThe goal of Hbar Technologies, LLC of Chicago, Illinois is “making antimatter matter”.

The research group is actively studying an antimatter-driven sail for deep space. They are blueprinting a system that could allow probes to be sent to the Kuiper belt and beyond, made possible by funds from the NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts (NIAC).

Many think that antimatter is more “mysterium” than real. In fact, antimatter is already being generated at facilities such as Brookhaven National Laboratory in New York and Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Illinois.

These labs produce antimatter by accelerating particles, such as protons, near the speed of light and ramming them into targets. The current worldwide, annual production of antimatter is only two billionths of a gram. Dramatic improvements in the production, storage and use of antimatter will be required to make it a viable propulsion alternative.

Although currently produced and stockpiled in small quantities using Penning Traps, antimatter must be stored in much higher densities to be applicable for missions into the outer realms of our solar system.

“In order to solve many of the mysteries of the universe or to explore the solar system and beyond, one single technology must be developed — high performance propulsion, said Steven Howe, co-founder and CEO of Hbar. “In essence, future missions to deep space will require specific impulses of over 50,000 seconds in order to accomplish the mission within the career lifetime of an individual, 40 years,” he said.

Only two technologies available to humankind offer such performance: fusion and antimatter. Fusion has proven unattainable despite forty years of research and billions of dollars. Antimatter, alternatively, Howe said, reacts 100 percent of the time in a well-described manner. Development of a suitable propulsion system, however, based on antimatter has yet to be shown.

STAR SAILING“We propose to develop such a system,” Howe explained. Along with Hbar Technologies co-founder and partner, Gerald Jackson, the firm is designing “a very straightforward system” that will produce a specific impulse of one million seconds. That system can be throttled, steered, and demonstrated within the next two years, the Hbar researchers report.

Currently, investigations are underway to develop high-capacity storage of antimatter in the form of antihydrogen. However, even if proven successful, no propulsion system has been demonstrated that would convert the antimatter into usable thrust.

The Hbar proposal is to utilize antiproton-induced fission to directly propel a small sail. By illuminating a thin foil of uranium with a stream of antiprotons, a million second propulsion system will be created - with no high temperatures, no magnetic fields, and no massive power supplies.

The researchers envision a lightweight sail that holds a trap of antimatter using a series of lightweight cables. For deep space missions to the Kuiper Belt, early results indicate that only 30 milligrams of antimatter are needed. For a mission to Alpha Centauri, a few tens of grams are required. The antimatter will be in the form of antihydrogen and will be stored as nano-flakes or as distributed atoms.

However, high capacity storage of antihydrogen is work in progress, although that capability appears reasonable to expect in the near future, Howe said.

The sail-mounted trap need only have the ability to release pulses of particles at intervals. The cloud of particles will escape the trap and expand into the vacuum. Striking the uranium-coated sail will cause fissions. The captured fission products will propel the sail forward.

“By pursing this path of research, we hope to develop the one technology that will allow humanity to reach farther than ever before and see what lies beyond,” Howe said.

PRACTICAL PROOFOver the last two years, a major gathering of worldwide experts in microwave and laser power beaming has been held — in the United States in 2002 and this year in Japan. A third confab is to take place in Troy, New York in 2004.

The international symposiums on beamed energy propulsion have shown that steady progress is being made, said Andrew Pakhomov, Associate Professor of Physics at the University of Alabama in Huntsville.

“These are serious scientific meetings,” Pakhomov said. Along with the experts from the United States and Japan, scientists and engineers from Russia, Germany, France, Canada, Brazil, Korea and India attend the meetings to share results in power beaming research, he said.

Laser power beaming work is in the lead, with more money being applied to that technology, Pakhomov commented. “Maybe in two or three years, I hope we see a serious breakthrough.”

Pakhomov saluted a recent experiment that highlights the increasing intensity of work.

Power beaming has moved a step closer to becoming workable thanks to researchers at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama, Dryden Flight Research Center at Edwards, California, along with experts at the University of Alabama in Huntsville.

The team has repeatedly flown a small-scale aircraft that flies solely by means of propulsive power transmitted via ground-based laser. The laser tracks the aircraft in flight, directing its energy beam at specially designed photovoltaic cells carried onboard to power the plane’s propeller.

“It’s practical proof ... and that’s important,” Pakhomov said.

AirSpike vehicle broadcasts a power beam ahead of its flight trajectory to create a detached shock wave for smooth sailing skyward.

WORLDWIDE PHENOMENON“We’re clearly at a threshold,” said Leik Myrabo of Bennington, Vermont. He is the just elected President of the newly formed International Society for Beamed Energy Propulsion (ISBEP).

Myrabo is no newcomer to power beaming. On October 2, 2000, after years of study, trial and error, his Lightcraft design rode a powerful shaft of laser light to a world altitude record at the Army’s White Sands, New Mexico test site.

That breakthrough experiment utilized a ground-based laser to pulse a cavity of air on the Lightcraft to the point that it repeatedly exploded, propelling the spacecraft forward. In the future, highly energetic fuels could be super-heated in a similar way. A network of power beaming stations on the ground, as well as in Earth orbit, could support skyway and spaceway traffic lanes.

“Power beaming is definitely a worldwide phenomenon. Nobody is getting rich on the research ... but the foundations are being set right now for what I think will become a revolution,” Myrabo told “It’s going to change everything. It will change the way we get around the planet and venturing off our world,” he said.

Myrabo envisions vehicles of the future dropping by your local neighborhood to pick you up, rather than having to fight traffic en route to any air or spaceport. Individuals can be “tractor beamed” through the sky in these craft, transported anywhere in the world in 45 minutes...or directly into space in a few minutes time.

“I see the Earth-Moon system as being colonized. Beamed energy propulsion will be the way of getting to orbit, to-and-from high orbit, and to-and-from the Moon. Much will change,” Myrabo believes. The Moon seems to be a logical place to build communities. Terra firma already exists on the Moon, he added, rather than waiting for the construction of gigantic colonies. Those too will come in time.

GET UP TO SPEEDAn early objective of ISBEP is to capitalize on big lasers and microwave devices that are already in service around the world. “We want to set these up as user facilities. Researchers can use these facilities, get their data ... all for a reasonable price. This way you avoid the big expenditures that created so many false starts in the past,” Myrabo said.

Like the laser beam aircraft tests done at Marshall Space Flight Center, more experiments are needed, Myrabo explained. One idea is use of a platform-mounted laser in orbit, modest in power, to accelerate a vehicle through space “just to make a point that it can be done.”

Lab work on the Lightcraft idea and other vehicle concepts is ongoing, Myrabo said. “The Wright Brothers had an edge over everybody else because they could control their machines ... and that’s needed now to go to ever-higher altitudes with power beaming.”

We have so much in our hands right now, as far as technology, to create a power beam-based revolution, Myrabo said.

“There’s a lot of physics today we are not applying to our propulsion and power systems. Many engineers are pre-occupied with chemical fuels. We really are talking about energetics. Imagine turning up the energetics a factor of ten or a hundred. That could radically transform what engines we use with that propellant ... and what vehicles those engines can propel.”

“The physics of flight will change. Right now we’ve got vehicles that by future standards are under-powered. The future ones…you’re going to blink and they are gone,” Myrabo predicted.

© 2003 All rights reserved.

© 2013 All rights reserved. More from


Discussion comments


Most active discussions

  1. votes comments
  2. votes comments
  3. votes comments
  4. votes comments