updated 12/10/2003 5:34:03 PM ET 2003-12-10T22:34:03

As flu sweeps across the country, many health experts are worried that the shots taken by tens of millions of Americans will offer considerably weaker protection than any flu vaccine in recent years.

  1. Don't miss these Health stories
    1. Splash News
      More women opting for preventive mastectomy - but should they be?

      Rates of women who are opting for preventive mastectomies, such as Angeline Jolie, have increased by an estimated 50 percent in recent years, experts say. But many doctors are puzzled because the operation doesn't carry a 100 percent guarantee, it's major surgery -- and women have other options, from a once-a-day pill to careful monitoring.

    2. Larry Page's damaged vocal cords: Treatment comes with trade-offs
    3. Report questioning salt guidelines riles heart experts
    4. CDC: 2012 was deadliest year for West Nile in US
    5. What stresses moms most? Themselves, survey says

The flu shot available this year was formulated to protect against three strains of the virus. But the strain actually circulating this year is somewhat different from those three, and it is probably too late to develop a new formula.

Even though one of the three is a close cousin of this season’s bug, whether that will be enough to help people ward off the flu is simply unknown. Some experts expect the level of protection to be 50 percent or less.

Most agree the vaccine will do at least some good. But the word “some” is about specific as scientists at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are willing to get.

Mismatch is first since 1997
Even in the best of years, the flu shot is not foolproof. Ordinarily it is between 70 percent and 90 percent effective in healthy young adults and somewhat less effective in the elderly.
The last time the vaccine missed the mark was in 1997, when a strain called A-Sydney appeared that was significantly different from the strain included in the flu shot. Doctors are still uncertain about how much good the shot did that season, although the CDC estimates it was 30 to 50 percent protective.

Scientists say this year’s mismatch does not seem to be as great as it was six years ago, but they cannot say with certainty how well the flu shot will work, or even whether it will.

“With a vaccine with a less optimal match, you have to say it might not work at all,” said Dr. Scott Harper, a CDC epidemiologist. “That’s very unlikely. Probably it will not be 90 percent effective. But we just have no good sense of how it will work in humans. Biology is messy.”

The mismatch occurred when experts decided to include a strain called A-Panama in this year’s shot, the same as last year. It turns out that the dominant virus this fall has been A-Fujian, which has two genetic mutations that make it different.

A variety of studies using ferrets, the primary lab animal for flu experiments, and human blood suggest that the A-Panama shots should offer at least partial protection against A-Fujian. The most encouraging predictions come from the World Health Organization, which, along with the Food and Drug Administration, decides what strains of flu virus will be included in the shot.

Vaccine may still help
Dr. Klaus Stohr said blood taken from people who got this year’s shot shows they have 41 percent fewer antibodies against A-Fujian than they do against A-Panama, and three-quarters of vaccinated adults have enough antibodies to protect against A-Fujian.
“The data indicate that the vaccine in use does protect to a good extent against the currently circulating strain,” Stohr said.

However, Harper said human blood samples and ferret experiments cannot reliably be used to predict how well a vaccine will work. The CDC is doing several studies to estimate how well people are protected in areas where the flu is circulating, but the answer probably will not be known until the end of the flu season.

Meanwhile, doctors continue to urge people to get vaccinated, even though supplies are running short, because the vaccine may help make the flu less severe, even if it fails to give complete protection. It also protects against two other flu strains that could appear later in the season.

Dr. Sandra Kemmerly, associate head of infectious diseases at the Oschner Clinic in New Orleans, said there is already anecdotal evidence that the shots are helping people escape the worst of the flu.

“Of the people we are seeing who were vaccinated and have flu-like symptoms, it is much milder than if they had not been vaccinated at all,” she said.

Dr. William Schaffner, head of preventive medicine at Vanderbilt University, noted that even a vaccine that is 50 percent effective may turn a serious illness into a milder one and help protect those who are especially vulnerable, such as the elderly, against pneumonia and death.
Doctors said there is circumstantial evidence suggesting that the FluMist nasal spray vaccine, which uses a weakened live virus, may do a better job of protecting against a mismatched virus.

Dr. Robert Belshe of St. Louis University said FluMist was tested in children during the season when A-Sydney emerged, and it still appeared to be 86 percent protective. More than 90 percent of children given FluMist that year made antibodies against the new strain, compared with less than a third who received standard flu shots.

This year, manufacturers made 83 million doses of flu vaccine. Supplies ran short in some parts of the country as the early and intense outbreak in Western states increased demand. The CDC said Tuesday it is working to redistribute remaining U.S. supplies and may buy fewer than 500,000 more doses from a British maker.

© 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Discuss:

Discussion comments

,

Most active discussions

  1. votes comments
  2. votes comments
  3. votes comments
  4. votes comments

Advertisement