Frank Franklin Ii  /  AP file
New York State Attorney General Eliot Spitzer launched the investigation into the mutual fund industry after receiving a tip about trading activities of a hedge fund.
By Martin Wolk
updated 12/29/2003 9:59:43 PM ET 2003-12-30T02:59:43

For a year in which there was so much good news emanating from the economy and the financial markets, there sure was a lot of bad news too.

Investors who enjoyed the first winning year on the stock market since 1999 also had to endure yet another year of scandal. This time the spotlight focused on the giant mutual fund industry and the New York Stock Exchange itself -- institutions that touch the lives of virtually every investor.

The economy finally began showing signs of life, but only after U.S. companies trimmed their already-spare payrolls even further.

Here are the top business stories of the year, as determined by MSNBC.com editors.

It's easy to steal a million dollars. Just steal a dollar each from a million people. Who would ever notice? Perhaps that is what some mutual fund managers and traders were thinking when they cooperated on plans to skim profits from dozens of funds in the worst — and first — scandal ever to hit the $7 trillion industry.

Much of the activity uncovered in a widening probe was not exactly illegal, but investors clearly were misled by fund companies who secretly arranged to do business with rapid-fire, short-term traders. Most of the funds had publicly told investors and regulators they discourage such business, which is harmful to long-term shareholders.

Losses may have added up to only tens or hundreds of dollars on each account, and it was difficult for investors to know what to do. After all, many of them probably had bought mutual funds in the first place so they wouldn't have to think too much about their investing. By year's end, New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer and other regulators were focusing on broad reform of the industry, potentially including lowering the fees paid by all mutual fund investors.

Less than six months ago, the economy looked like President Bush's biggest soft spot heading into the 2004 elections. Democratic rivals like Howard Dean and Richard Gephardt were hammering away at the Bush record on employment -- the worst since Herbert Hoover's tenure at the brink of the Great Depression.

Jeff Roberson / AP File  /  AP
Low interest rates and tax rebates helped power consumer spending in 2003, giving the economy a big boost in the second half of the year.
Then things suddenly began looking up. Boosted by a tailwind of low interest rates, cash from a wave of mortgage refinancing, and a major federal tax cut, the economy grew at a stunning 8.2 percent rate in the third quarter -- its fastest pace in two decades. Payrolls -- which had shed 2.6 million jobs since January 2001 -- began growing again, and the jobless rate drifted lower.

Employment growth still is nowhere near where it should be in an expansion, but forecasters say the economy clearly is on a path for its best growth in years. And if the economy should show any signs of slipping, Congress and the Bush administration are standing by. "Historically election years have this uncanny ability to outperform non-election years," said David Rosenberg, chief North American economist at Merrill Lynch.


Mike Segar  /  Reuters
In 2003, Wall Street broke its string of three straight losing years as the economy began to pick up momentum and investors sought stock market bargains.
The year 2003 was a great year for almost anyone invested in the stock market, but 12 months ago few would have guessed it. A string of corporate governance scandals had pushed the market’s main gauges lower for a third consecutive year in 2002 and a war with Iraq was looming, keeping investors on the sidelines of the market.

But even as the bombs began falling on Baghdad, stocks were already moving off the multi-year lows they sank to in early March, buoyed by one of the most powerful stimulus programs in economic history. They moved steadily higher over the spring and summer, as corporate earnings improved, data on the economy popped and investors placed their bets on a strong recovery in the year’s second half.

By Dec. 11, they were toasting the end of the two-and-a-half-year bear market, as the Dow Jones industrial average pierced the 10,000 level for the first time in 19 months.

In its 217-year history, the New York Stock Exchange has seen its share of financial scandals. After all, as bank robber Willie Sutton observed in a different context, that’s where the money is.

Afp  /  Getty Images file
Former NYSE President Richard Grasso might have to fight to keep his outsized comensation.
While frauds and swindles have come and gone, the latest upheaval engulfing the epicenter of capitalism is shaking the foundations of the exchange like few in recent memory. Starting with the resignation of former Chairman Richard Grasso — after disclosure of his outsized $187.5 million pay package — the Big Board began to remake itself. Some directors were dismissed, board seats were abolished, and a separate regulatory board will now police members. No longer will one boss rule the operations of the exchange while wielding the threat of enforcement against dissenting voices.

But the process is far from complete. One of the first tasks facing incoming NYSE president John Thain, a Goldman Sachs alumnus, will be defending against a lawsuit filed by the nation’s biggest pension fund claiming that, on the exchange floor, the game is rigged. CalPERS, the pension manager for California state workers, is arguing that the NYSE’s storied “open outcry” system of trading — where people, not computers, match trades — has allowed its members to line their pockets at the exchange of individual investors.

That basic method of trading has survived since traders first gathered under a Buttonwood tree in lower Manhattan and signed an agreement that created what we now know as the NYSE. What members, investors and regulators are now debating is how that system can continue in the new millennium.

Maybe soldiers and sailors returning from World War II remember getting 30-year mortgages for under 6 percent. But until this year those kinds of rates were just a distant memory for most homebuyers.

Stephen J. Boitano  /  AP file
Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan rode out a storm but appears to have helped engineer a solid economic turnaround.
The Federal Reserve did its part, cutting the benchmark federal funds rate to 1 percent, its lowest level since the late 1950s. That, in turn, lowered the rates on a wide variety of business and consumer loans. And central bankers took the unprecedented step of promising they would keep rates low for a "considerable period" of time.

Rates had been heading lower for more than two years, and by the second half of 2003 the impact was becoming clear. A huge new wave of mortgage refinancing pumped cash into the economy, and home sales were on a pace to shatter the 2002 record of 6.5 million units.

And with the economy growing more rapidly, businesses finally were taking advantage of the lower rates to step up the pace of capital investment.

For a company that works on a grand scale, maybe bigger isn't better for Boeing. It certainly wasn't this year.

Anne Ryan  /  AP file
Harry Stonecipher has taken over the controls at Boeing.
The Big B’s airplane business withered, accelerated by 9/11's aftereffects. For the first time ever, rival Airbus delivered more aircraft. The 757 was cancelled in October. The 767 was turned from passenger jet into military tanker.

That latter plan really brought down the curtain.

After a drawn-out battle in Washington over costs for the tankers, Boeing had to fire CFO Mike Sears when it was revealed he recruited the Pentagon official who oversaw the company's contracts. CEO Phil Condit stepped down soon after. Independent reviews of Boeing ethics standards found plenty of holes.

Perhaps this was the comeuppance first forecast when, in 1997, Condit launched a buying spree to grow the company beyond its airplane roots. A 2001 move of Boeing headquarters from Seattle to Chicago – paired with major layoffs — telegraphed that message. As such, its stock and ratings tumbled as investors became understandably worried.

New CEO Harry Stonecipher has scrambled to regain momentum. In December Boeing’s board OK’d the 7E7, the first jet program approved since 1990. But the new plane means big new expenses, and future defense contracts will get scrutiny given the recent stink. Boeing is doing its best to climb out after its miserable year, but the ride will be bumpy.

Amid the tide of upbeat economic news in recent months, one question lingered: Where were the jobs? The labor market has improved since the summer, but the inevitable truth is coming clear: Many jobs aren’t coming back. They were sent overseas.

We didn’t need the Bush administration appointing a “manufacturing czar” to remind us factory jobs were vanishing; that’s been happening for years. But in the retail world, even die-hard patriots like Wal-Mart succumbed to the price pressures of cheap foreign goods. Following its mandate to roll back prices, the world’s largest retailer imported tons of Chinese merchandise, prompting a reconsideration of one Fed official’s assessment that the world’s largest retailer was “the greatest thing” for less-affluent Americans.

Even in Mexico, which used to be the stalking-horse for our manufacturing woes, workers freaked out as waves of Chinese goods flooded the market. Meantime, the U.S. job drain expanded into new sectors. If it wasn’t news that tech firms reaped benefits in Bangalore, we learned this year that all sorts of white-collar jobs could be shipped overseas by the tens of thousands, from Delta reservations agents to J.P. Morgan number-crunchers. Perhaps this was globalization’s real eventuality, underscored by record U.S. imports. The unresolved paradox of free trade remains: ever-better prices, but fewer people to spend as the appeal of lower wages elsewhere eliminates many jobs for good. American consumers will have to decide how that one ends.

It was a party reminiscent of the Predators Ball — that annual 1980s-era bash thrown by Drexel Burnham to fuel the junk bond factory that funded the excesses of that decade. There were the toga-clad guests, swaying to Jimmy Buffett tunes on the Mediterranean island of Sardinia, ringing up a $2 million tab for a Roman-style feast that included an anatomically correct ice sculpture of Michelangelo's statue David squirting vodka into crystal glasses. The occasion: the birthday of the second wife of Dennis Kozlowski, former CEO of Tyco Interational.

New York district attorney  /  AP file
Former Tyco Internatonal CEO Dennis Kozlowski is flanked by toga-clad women in a still image from the infamous party video.
The ice sculpture was just the tip of the iceberg, prosecutors say. Kozlowski stands accused of teaming up with the company’s former chief financial officer, Mark Swartz, to fleece the company of some $600 million.

Every corporate boom leads to excess. But Michael Milken stands as a model of restraint next to the interior decorating spree disclosed in Tyco’s SEC filings. Jurors at Kozlowski’s trial in Manhattan recently viewed hundreds of invoices for furnishings to the Tyco tycoon’s $18 million Fifth Avenue apartment: A $6,000 shower curtain, a $15,000 umbrella stand, a $38,000 backgammon table, a $113,750 George I walnut arabesque clock.

In all, the bills came to about $11 million. Kozlowski, 56, and Swartz, 43, each face up to 30 years in prison if convicted of using Tyco's money to finance their lavish lifestyles. The defense contends that multimillion-dollar loans and bonuses were legitimately approved by the company board of directors and vetted by outside auditors. As for Kozlowski's $100 million salary, defense attorney Stephen Kaufman said: "He earned all of it." Testimony resumes Jan. 5.

When Martha Stewart was at the height of her powers, her fans could not get enough of her. As her syndicated television show gained popularity in the 1990s, she built an empire that included a magazine, books, lines of bath products, linens and flowers, and finally a publicly traded company -- all bearing her name.

Louis Lanzano  /  AP file
Martha Stewart leaves Manhattan Federal Court after her indictment in June.
Now that she has been indicted on insider-trading charges, the modern doyenne of entertaining has moved from the lifestyle section to the business pages.

Stewart stands accused of lying about her sale of $228,000 worth of stock in December 2001. By selling just before bad news was disclosed about the biotech company, she avoided losses of about $46,000, prosecutors contend. In a trial that begins next month Stewart -- who denies any wrongdoing -- will face up to 30 years in prison and $2 million in fines. Her company, Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, has seen its share price fall from $20 to about $9.

No wonder Stewart told Larry King that for her, this is "the saddest holiday ever."

There is little doubt that Freddie Mac is a major player in the real estate industry. It is somewhat less clear exactly what the company does. Even the company's accountants seem to have a hard time sorting through the complex web of derivative transactions the financing giant uses to hedge its interest-rate bets and boost profit margins.

One of the nation's biggest financial concerns, Freddie Mac was rocked by revelations that it had misstated its earnings for years, apparently in a concerted effort to smooth quarterly flucturations and meet Wall Street expectations. The fact the the company earned $5 billion MORE than previously announced did little to stem the outrage over a company that is seen to enjoy special status by virtue of the congressional mandate that created it.

Freddie Mac has agreed to pay a record $125 million to settle charges with the federal agency created to regulate it and aces the possibility of additional fines and penalties.

MSNBC's Jon Bonné, Roland Jones and John Schoen contributed to this story.

© 2013 msnbc.com Reprints


Discussion comments


Most active discussions

  1. votes comments
  2. votes comments
  3. votes comments
  4. votes comments

Data: Latest rates in the US

Home equity rates View rates in your area
Home equity type Today +/- Chart
$30K HELOC FICO 3.79%
$30K home equity loan FICO 4.99%
$75K home equity loan FICO 4.69%
Credit card rates View more rates
Card type Today +/- Last Week
Low Interest Cards 13.83%
Cash Back Cards 17.80%
Rewards Cards 17.18%
Source: Bankrate.com