Video: BP emails point to 'questionable decisions'

  1. Transcript of: BP emails point to 'questionable decisions'

    LESTER HOLT, anchor: We learned today that the well spewing oil out of the Gulf of Mexico was labeled a nightmare by a BP engineer nearly a week before any of us had ever heard of Deepwater Horizon . Internal BP documents released by Congress reveal what it describes as a series of money-saving shortcuts leading up to the April 20th blowout, all detailed in a letter to the company's CEO, who testifies on Capitol Hill later this week. Tonight, 56 days into the crisis, the oil spill appears on the map as a massive dark stain fouling the marshlands of Louisiana to the beaches of Pensacola , Florida . Returning to the disaster zone today, President Obama promised things are going to get back to normal there, while, for its part, BP says it now has a plan to capture 40 to 50,000 barrels of oil a day by the end the end of the month. Our coverage begins tonight with NBC 's Lisa Myers .

    LISA MYERS reporting: In the crucial days before the explosion, congressional investigators say BP made a series of decisions to save time and money at the expense of safety. Chairman Henry Waxman heads the investigation.

    Representative HENRY WAXMAN: We found a pattern where that every time they had a decision to make, they decided to cut corners, to do things faster than otherwise should've been done, to do it less expensively, and the consequence of this, as one industry expert told us, was horribly negligent.

    MYERS: In a letter to BP 's CEO Tony Hayward , the committee identified five crucial decisions it said increased the danger of a catastrophe, including using a cheaper well design for the bottom of the well ; using too few centralizers, attachments between the well casing and the bore hull which keep the well centered; "not running two critical tests" to evaluate the effectiveness of the cement job and to test for gas. Why? The committee says BP was behind schedule. In one e-mail five days before the explosion, a BP drilling engineer wrote, "This has been a nightmare well which has everyone all over the place ." The committee revealed internal e-mails which noted the well design ultimately

    chosen was justified this way: saves a lot of time, at least three days. And the other option which was rejected? BP noted it will add an additional seven to $10 million to the completion cost. When Haliburton kept pushing for more centralizers to be sure the well pipe was centered, a BP official complains. "It will take ten hours to install them," he writes. "I do not like this." The same day, one BP drilling engineer 's e-mail to another indicates that the decision not to add more centralizers will stand. "But who cares? It's done, end of story. We'll probably be fine and we'll get a good cement job."

    Rep. WAXMAN: They violated what their own employees were recommending they do. They violated their own industry practices, and they ignored recommendations of contractors who told them to be sure to do certain tests to avoid safety concerns.

    MYERS: The committee concludes that, time after time , BP appeared to make decisions that increased the risk of a blowout. Tonight, a BP spokesman said it would be inappropriate for the company to comment ahead of the hearing. Lisa Myers , NBC News, Washington.

By Associated Press Writers
updated 6/14/2010 7:15:02 PM ET 2010-06-14T23:15:02

BP made a series of money-saving shortcuts and blunders that dramatically increased the danger of a destructive oil spill in a well that an engineer ominously described as a "nightmare" just six days before the blowout, according to documents released Monday that provide new insight into the causes of the disaster.

The House Energy and Commerce Committee released dozens of internal documents that outline several problems on the deepsea rig in the days and weeks before the April 20 explosion that set in motion the largest environmental disaster in U.S. history. The committee has been investigating the explosion and its aftermath.

"Time after time, it appears that BP made decisions that increased the risk of a blowout to save the company time or expense. If this is what happened, BP's carelessness and complacency have inflicted a heavy toll on the Gulf, its inhabitants, and the workers on the rig," said Democratic Reps. Henry A. Waxman and Bart Stupak.

The missteps emerged on the same day that President Barack Obama made his fourth visit to the Gulf , where he sought to assure beleaguered residents that the government will "leave the Gulf Coast in better shape than it was before."

The breached well has dumped as much as 114 million gallons of oil into the Gulf under the worst-case scenario described by scientists — a rate of more than 2 million a day. BP has collected 5.6 million gallons of oil through its latest containment cap on top of the well, or about 630,000 gallons per day.

But BP believes it will see considerable improvements in the next two weeks. The company said Monday that it could trap a maximum of roughly 2.2 million gallons of oil each day by the end of June as it deploys additional containment efforts, including a system that could start burning off vast quantities as early as Tuesday. That would more than triple the amount of oil it is currently capturing — and be a huge relief for those trying to keep it from hitting the shore.

Possible 'game changer'
"It would be a game changer," said Coast Guard Chief Petty Officer Mark Boivin, deputy director for near-shore operations at a command center in Mobile. He works with a team that coordinates the efforts of roughly 80 skimming boats gathering oil off the coast.

Still, BP warned its containment efforts could face problems if hoses or pipes clog and engineers struggle to run the complicated collection system. Early efforts at the bottom of the Gulf failed to capture oil.

Meanwhile, congressional investigators have identified several mistakes by BP in the weeks leading up to the disaster as it fell way behind on drilling the well.

BP started drilling in October, only to have the rig damaged by Hurricane Ida a month later. The company switched to the Deepwater Horizon rig and resumed drilling on Feb. 6. The rig was 43 days late for its next drilling location by the time it exploded April 20, costing BP at least $500,000 each day it was overdue, congressional documents show.

As BP found itself in a frantic race against time to get the job done, engineers cut corners in the well design, cementing and drilling mud efforts and the installation of safety devices known as "lockdown sleeves" and "centralizers," according to congressional investigators.

In the design of the well, the company apparently chose a riskier option among two possibilities to provide a barrier to the flow of gas in space surrounding steel tubes in the well, documents and internal e-mails show. The decision saved BP $7 million to $10 million; the original cost estimate for the well was about $96 million.

'Crazy well'
In an e-mail, BP engineer Brian Morel told a fellow employee that the company is likely to make last-minute changes in the well.

Video: Local officials brace for oil onslaught "We could be running it in 2-3 days, so need a relative quick response. Sorry for the late notice, this has been nightmare well which has everyone all over the place," Morel wrote.

The e-mail chain culminated with the following message by another worker: "This has been a crazy well for sure."

BP also apparently rejected advice of a subcontractor, Halliburton Inc., in preparing for a cementing job to close up the well. BP rejected Halliburton's recommendation to use 21 "centralizers" to make sure the casing ran down the center of the well bore. Instead, BP used six centralizers.

In an e-mail on April 16, a BP official involved in the decision explained: "It will take 10 hours to install them. I do not like this." Later that day, another official recognized the risks of proceeding with insufficient centralizers but commented: "Who cares, it's done, end of story, will probably be fine."

The lawmakers also said BP also decided against a nine- to 12-hour procedure known as a "cement bond log" that would have tested the integrity of the cement. A team from Schlumberger, an oil services firm, was on board the rig, but BP sent the team home on a regularly scheduled helicopter flight the morning of April 20.

Less than 12 hours later, the rig exploded.

BP also failed to fully circulate drilling mud, a 12-hour procedure that could have helped detect gas pockets that later shot up the well and exploded on the drilling rig.

A spokesman for BP could not immediately reached for comment on the findings, but executives including CEO Tony Hayward will be questioned by Congress on Thursday.

The letter from Waxman and Stupak noted at least five questionable decisions BP made before the explosion, and was supplemented by 61 footnotes and dozens of documents.

"The common feature of these five decisions is that they posed a trade-off between cost and well safety," said Waxman and Stupak. Waxman chairs the energy panel while Stupak heads a subcommittee on oversight and investigations.

Copyright 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


Discussion comments


Most active discussions

  1. votes comments
  2. votes comments
  3. votes comments
  4. votes comments