Video: Senate committee OKs Petraeus

  1. Closed captioning of: Senate committee OKs Petraeus

    >>> despite that quick action, the -- lawmakers grilled the general about the rules of engagement , the ability of the afghan army to stand up and fight and the timetable for bringing americans home.

    >> the vice president of the united states has been quoted in a book widely published in the united states which i'm sure the enemy can have access to that come july 2011 we're going to be leaving in large numbers , you can bet on it. is he right?

    >> secretary gates has said i believe in testimony that he never heard vice president biden say that remark.

    >> he's saying one thing to one person allegedly and he's saying another thing to you and they don't reconcile themselves and that's exactly my point. it depends on who you seem to be talking to.

    >> jim miklaszewski is live at the pentagon, and i know you've been watching this all day.

    >> everybody knew going in that general petreaus would be confirmed almost immediately by the senate armed services committee and the full senate expected to confirm his nomination to become the top military commander in afghanistan before the end of the week so general petreaus can head over to afghanistan as the new commander, also before the end of the week. but you'll notice how deftally general petraeus answered some of the questions. general mcchrystal felt oblige blijed to answer some of the questions when joe openly -- joe bide on's take on the general for afghanistan . so if nothing else, general petreaus is more politically adept and quick on his feet. but general petreaus was also forthright about how difficult the road ahead was going to be in the short-term. and he said it's a far cry, really, from iraq, because you're starting at a baseline of zero in afghanistan , they don't have the kind of infrastructure, a widespread national central government and the like, so he didn't make any bones about that. but he was also optimistic that there could be some progress in afghanistan by july of next year. not to withdraw huge numbers of troops, but to at least begin a process to hand over control and security, the responsibility for security to the afghans, but nobody has any doubts that u.s. military forces are going to be in afghanistan probably for the next four to five years.

    >> and then another topic about the headache that is afghanistan , let me ask you what you know about this " wall street journal " report that claims more than $3 billion was illegally shipped to the airport in kabul. just in the last three years.

    >> i have been -- i had a couple of extended stays in afghanistan and then an opportunity to talk to many government officials actually who confirmed to me that large amounts of money were being sent out of the country, they claim indirectly by president hamid karzai and some of his brothers, most of that money going to dubai, the only satisfaction that some u.s. officials in afghanistan had was that the karzai family, according to these sources now had invested huge amounts of money in the dubai real estate market which like most real estate markets around the world crashed.

    >> jim miklaszewski at the pentagon.

updated 6/29/2010 7:14:15 PM ET 2010-06-29T23:14:15

Gen. David Petraeus left open the possibility of recommending that President Barack Obama delay his plans to start withdrawing troops from Afghanistan next summer if the new commander can't turn around the stalemated war.

  1. Other political news of note
    1. Animated Boehner: 'There's nothing complex about the Keystone Pipeline!'

      House Speaker John Boehner became animated Tuesday over the proposed Keystone Pipeline, castigating the Obama administration for not having approved the project yet.

    2. Budget deficits shrinking but set to grow after 2015
    3. Senate readies another volley on unemployment aid
    4. Obama faces Syria standstill
    5. Fluke files to run in California

"There will be an assessment at the end of this year after which undoubtedly we'll make certain tweaks, refinements, perhaps some significant changes," Petraeus told a Senate panel Tuesday of the battle plan and the timeline Obama has laid out.

The Senate Armed Services Committee quickly approved Petraeus for the job of running the Afghan war, and the full Senate could act as early as Tuesday evening. Obama nominated Petraeus to take over from the disgraced Gen. Stanley McChrystal, fired last week for disparaging remarks about his civilian bosses.

Petraeus also told senators that he may change the war's battlefield rules, designed to limit civilian casualties and improve support for the foreign forces fighting the Taliban-led insurgency. Some troops and congressional Republicans complain they handicap U.S. forces.

Obama has said troops will begin to leave in July 2011, but that the pace and size of the withdrawal will depend upon conditions.

Petraeus did not rule out a significant exodus then, as Vice President Joe Biden favors, but he would not promise one either. Petraeus has previously said that he would recommend putting off any large-scale withdrawal if security conditions in Afghanistan can't sustain it.

The general, credited with turning around the Iraq war after the height of sectarian violence there in 2006, told the Senate panel that Obama wants him to provide unvarnished military advice.

He did not paint a rosy picture on Tuesday.

"My sense is that the tough fighting will continue; indeed, it may get more intense in the next few months," Petraeus said. "As we take away the enemy's safe havens and reduce the enemy's freedom of action, the insurgents will fight back."

Beneath bipartisan rounds of praise for Petraeus lay fault lines over the nearly nine-year war. A make-or-break military push across southern Afghanistan is stuck in neutral, though U.S. officials insist there are signs of progress and reason for hope.

"On the Democratic side, there is solid support. But there's also the beginnings of fraying of that support" for the war, committee Chairman Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., said ahead of Tuesday's session.

As the number of troop deaths rise, support for the war is dropping in the United States and Europe. June is the deadliest month of the war so far, with the total U.S. deaths above 1,000, and the new British government says it wants its troops out in five years.

A careful student of politics, Petraeus gave something to everyone while leaving himself room to maneuver.

For Democrats and his White House masters, Petraeus endorsed Obama's revamped war strategy and the plan to begin withdrawing U.S. forces from the unpopular fight next July.

The exit plan isn't just a sop to American liberals opposed to the conflict, Petraeus said under questioning from skeptical Republicans.

He made clear he is wary of deadlines, but said he values the sense of urgency Obama's timeline conveys.

"I'm convinced it was not just for domestic political purposes," he said. "It was for audiences in Kabul, who, again, needed to be reminded that we won't be there forever."

For Republicans uneasy about the strict rules of engagement, Petraeus promised a hard examination. In particular, he will look at the way the "tactical directive" is applied.

The directive is the guidance given to commanders on when they can rely on heavy firepower such as attack helicopters to protect troops under attack. McChrystal had limited the circumstances under which such bombing could be used.

  1. Click here for related content
    1. NYT: With command shift, talk turns to withdrawal
    2. Analysis: Petraeus faces daunting challenges
    3. U.S., Afghan forces launch assault
    4. McChrystal tells Army he'll retire

Petraeus said he believes the rules and the reasoning behind them are basically sound.

"That's an area we have to look very closely at because, of course, if you drop a bomb on a house, if you're not sure who's in it, you can kill a lot of innocent civilians in a hurry," he told the Senate panel.

At the same time, Petraeus said he is concerned that some commanders were "making this more bureaucratic or more restrictive than necessary when our troops and our Afghan partners are in a tough spot.

"And when they are in a tough spot, it's a moral imperative that we use everything we have to ensure that they get out of it," he said.

The only fireworks came when Sen. Lindsey Graham, a South Carolina Republican, sharply questioned Petraeus about whether he agreed with White House suggestions that the pullout will occur on schedule, no matter what Afghanistan looks like in a year's time.

"Somebody needs to get it straight without doubt what the hell we're going to do in Afghanistan," Graham said.

Petraeus suggested that the infighting between U.S. military and civilian officials responsible for Afghanistan policy would end. Several times throughout the hearing, Petraeus said he already had been in close contact with Karl Eikenberry, the top diplomat in Afghanistan who sparred with McChrystal.

Petraeus said the two planned to meet in Brussels this week to confer with NATO officials before flying together to Kabul.

Petraeus became chief of U.S. Central Command following his time in Iraq. In that job he oversaw both wars but had no direct battlefield responsibility. The Afghanistan job is technically a step down, albeit one that came at the direct request of the commander in chief.

© 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


Discussion comments


Most active discussions

  1. votes comments
  2. votes comments
  3. votes comments
  4. votes comments