Brennan Linsley  /  AP
During a rescue mission by a team from a U.S. Air Force Expeditionary Rescue Squadron, army medics carry a wounded Afghan Army soldier to an evacuation helicopter, in Kandahar province, southern Afghanistan on Monday.
By
updated 8/3/2010 3:43:08 PM ET 2010-08-03T19:43:08
Analysis

With U.S. troop strength approaching 100,000, the Afghan war is entering its decisive phase. Without measurable progress in the coming months, political support for the conflict may collapse.

Back-to-back months of record U.S. military death tolls — 60 in June and 66 in July — shocked many Americans, even though the Pentagon had been warning of higher casualties this summer as the U.S. and its allies push into longtime Taliban strongholds around Kandahar city and in the southern province of Helmand.

The campaign is aimed at securing Kandahar, a city of about a half million, the major urban area of the ethnic Pashtun south and the former Taliban headquarters. Securing the city is considered pivotal if the NATO-led coalition is to reverse the Taliban momentum in their southern stronghold.

Failure would be a grave — if not fatal — blow to the entire NATO-led mission in Afghanistan.

It could encourage President Hamid Karzai, who was born near Kandahar, to seek a political deal with Taliban leaders on terms that Afghan ethnic minorities, women and the U.S. might find unfavorable. And it could discourage Pakistan from ever cracking down on Afghan Taliban fighters living in border sanctuaries since they may someday wield power in Afghanistan after the U.S. leaves.

But progress in breaking the Taliban's grip has been slow and difficult to measure in a war where the opinions of rural Afghan villagers are as important — if not more — than seizing strategic terrain. It's hard to explain the deaths of young soldiers without compelling evidence that their sacrifice was worth it.

Supporters of the counterinsurgency strategy which President Barack Obama embraced last year acknowledge that it will take time to determine whether the operations around Kandahar have achieved even modest success.

Even if Taliban attacks decline, it will take time to tell whether the insurgents have been driven off or simply went underground as they did in the Helmand town of Marjah, only to return later with more ambushes and roadside bombs.

Afghan civilians are unlikely to shift their support to the coalition and the Afghan government without compelling evidence that the Taliban are gone and that their own leaders are making good on promises of better public services and good governance.

'Very hard to tell'
"We're at one of those moments where it's very hard to tell whether things are going well or badly," Stephen Biddle of the Council on Foreign Relations said in an interview with CFR.org website. "Counterinsurgency always has this 'darkest before the dawn' quality."

Time is one resource that the U.S. and its allies don't have.

Support for the war is already wavering in Washington and the capitals of the other allied nations that provide troops here. The Dutch ended their combat mission last weekend, and the Canadians plan to pull out next year. The Poles want to leave in 2012.

Last week, Democratic leaders in the House of Representatives had to rely on Republican support to pass the almost $59 billion measure to finance Obama's additional 30,000 troops in Afghanistan and other programs. Twelve Republicans and 102 Democrats opposed it.

A prominent Republican on the Armed Services Committee, Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, said congressional support could collapse next year if conservative Republicans withdraw their backing to make Obama look bad and if anti-war Democrats insist on a pullout.

"If, by December, we're not showing some progress, we're in trouble," Graham told CNN's "State of the Union" on Sunday. "And the question is, what is progress? Without some benchmarks and measurements, it's going to be hard to sell to the American people a continued involvement in Afghanistan."

  1. Click here for related content
    1. PhotoBlog: Winning hearts and minds - with guns
    2. Suicide car bomb kills 6 kids in south Afghanistan
    3. NYT: Targeted killing is new U.S. focus in Afghanistan
    4. Informant: WikiLeaks suspect had help
    5. A journey to find the soul of Israel

    6. Sunny with a chance of rocket-propelled grenades

With low public support and wavering resolve, the Obama administration has launched a fresh effort to portray U.S. goals in Afghanistan as modest — reminding Americans that Afghanistan was where the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks were orchestrated.

"We face huge challenges in Afghanistan," Obama said Monday in Atlanta, where he announced that the U.S. would meet its goal of ending its combat mission in Iraq by the end of this month. "But it's important that the American people know that we are making progress and we're focused on goals that are clear and achievable."

Kandahar offensive slips
American officials had hoped to ramp up operations in the Kandahar area last spring. But the timetable slipped for numerous reasons, including public opposition within the city to stepped-up military operations and delays in getting enough trained Afghan troops in place.

In recent weeks, however, U.S. and Afghan troops have begun to challenge the Taliban in the lush Arghandab Valley and other districts around Kandahar. American troops are accelerating the training of Afghan police to provide security within the city itself.

The goal is to put an Afghan face on the security operation to counter Taliban allegations that the international troops are a foreign occupation force.

But the campaign faces major hurdles, some of them self-imposed.

Obama plans a review of the Afghan strategy at the end of the year and has pledged to begin withdrawing American troops in next July.

Although administration officials insist the withdrawal will be slow and based on security conditions on the ground, the dates have left Afghan officials confused about the Western commitment, despite repeated assurances that America and its allies won't abandon Afghanistan.

U.S. officers in southern Afghanistan say villagers are reluctant to cooperate with the Americans and their Afghan partners because they fear the Taliban will take retribution against them once the Americans have gone. The villagers simply don't trust the Afghan police to fill the security gap.

"There is nothing more tragic than watching beautiful theories being assaulted by gangs of ugly facts. It is time, however, to be far more realistic about the war in Afghanistan," former Pentagon analyst Anthony Cordesman wrote in June for the Center for Strategic & International Studies. "It may well still be winnable, but it is not going to be won by denying the risks, the complexity, and the time that any real hope of victory will take."

Robert H. Reid is AP chief of bureau in Kabul and news director for Afghanistan-Pakistan.

Copyright 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Video: Mullen on Taliban, mission in Afghanistan

  1. Transcript of: Mullen on Taliban, mission in Afghanistan

    MR. GREGORY: But true or untrue, the big fear is that Pakistan 's working against us and not with us?

    ADM. MULLEN: In many ways, Pakistan is working with us. I mean, their, their military, their intelligence agency . I mean, we've got a very strong relationship in the positive sense with, with their intelligence agency . That doesn't mean there aren't some challenges with some aspects of it.

    MR. GREGORY: They are actively supporting elements killing U.S. soldiers .

    ADM. MULLEN: But they have, they have shared intelligence with us, they've killed as many or more terrorists as anybody, they've captured them. And certainly, the, the focus on changing the strategic shift, if you will, in that agency so that that doesn't happen at all, is a priority for us.

    MR. GREGORY: Fair to say that among the outcomes you would look at would be a scenario where the Taliban would have some power in the country?

    ADM. MULLEN: I think in any of these kinds of insurgency over history, in the political solution, those who have been insurgents at some point in time have been in a position of political influence at some point down the road. But I think we're way too early to say how -- what that looks like or when it might happen.

    MR. GREGORY: It -- it's -- it seems to be an important point, if you look at the cover of Time magazine , which has a pretty striking photograph of a young woman whose nose was cut off by the Taliban , a -- just one indication of how brutal and horrific these people are. And, and they've done this when they were in power and, indeed, even when they've been out of power. The grim reality, if that's an argument for why the U.S. should not leave, is that our central mission , the central mission of the United States is not to protect the women of Afghanistan . Is that fair?

    ADM. MULLEN: I think the central mission in Afghanistan right now is to protect the people, certainly, and that would be inclusive of everybody, and that in a, in an insurgency and a counterinsurgency, that's really the center of gravity.

    MR. GREGORY: But you said a year ago our central mission was to get at those who threaten us. Our central mission is not to protect the women , who could still be brutalized if the Taliban comes into power in any fashion.

    ADM. MULLEN: Well, the Taliban are incredibly unpopular with the Afghan people , even as we speak , and they have -- as they have been for a long period of time. The mission -- the overall mission is to dismantle and defeat and disrupt al-Qaeda . But we have to make sure there's not a safe haven that returns in Afghanistan . Afghanistan has to be stable enough, has to have enough governance, have to -- has to create enough jobs, have an economy that's good enough so that the Taliban cannot return to the brutality of the kind of regime that you just showed.

    MR. GREGORY: However, the United States could still withdraw and, and do so having achieved the mission , and yet women like, like those on the cover of that magazine could still be in danger.

    ADM. MULLEN: Certainly, the, the, the long-term goal is to make sure that the -- with respect to the population in Afghanistan , that there's a governant -- governance structure that treats its people well. And I -- but to say exactly how that's going to look and what specifics would be involved, I think it's just way too early.

Photos: Casualties of the Mind

loading photos...
  1. Sgt. Daniel Rodriguez, 22, of Stafford, Va., with Bravo Troop, 3rd Squadron, 61st Cavalry, poses at Forward Operating Base Bostick in Kunar province, east of Kabul, Afghanistan. Sgt. Rodriguez was awarded a Silver Star for his actions in one of the deadliest battles ever waged by U.S. forces on Oct. 3, 2009 when hundreds of insurgents attacked their combat outpost "Keating" in eastern Afghanistan. (Dusan Vranic / AP) Back to slideshow navigation
  2. Sgt. Jonathan Hill with Bravo Troop, 3rd Squadron, 61st Cavalry, at Forward Operating Base Bostick in Kunar province, east of Kabul, Afghanistan. Sgt. Hill was awarded a Silver Star for his actions in one of the deadliest battles ever waged by U.S. forces on Oct. 3, 2009 when hundreds of insurgents attacked their combat outpost "Keating" in eastern Afghanistan. (Dusan Vranic / AP) Back to slideshow navigation
  3. Sgt. Shane Courville, 28, with Bravo Troop, 3rd Squadron, 61st Cavalry, at Forward Operating Base Bostick in Kunar province, east of Kabul, Afghanistan. Sgt. Courville was awarded a Bronze Star for his actions in one of the deadliest battles ever waged by U.S. forces on Oct. 3, 2009 when hundreds of insurgents attacked their combat outpost "Keating" in eastern Afghanistan. (Dusan Vranic / AP) Back to slideshow navigation
  4. Specialist Ty Michael Carter, 30, of Antioch, Calif., with Bravo Troop, 3rd Squadron, 61st Cavalry, at Forward Operating Base Bostick in Kunar province, east of Kabul, Afghanistan. Spc. Carter took part in one of the deadliest battles ever waged by U.S. forces on Oct. 3, 2009 when hundreds of insurgents attacked their combat outpost "Keating" in eastern Afghanistan. (Dusan Vranic / AP) Back to slideshow navigation
  1. Editor's note:
    This image contains graphic content that some viewers may find disturbing.

    Click to view the image, or use the buttons above to navigate away.

  2. Editor's note:
    This image contains graphic content that some viewers may find disturbing.

    Click to view the image, or use the buttons above to navigate away.

  3. Editor's note:
    This image contains graphic content that some viewers may find disturbing.

    Click to view the image, or use the buttons above to navigate away.

  4. Editor's note:
    This image contains graphic content that some viewers may find disturbing.

    Click to view the image, or use the buttons above to navigate away.

  1. Image:
    Dusan Vranic / AP
    Above: Slideshow (4) Casualties of the mind
  2. Image: Afghan National Army soldier Mirza Mirzali, a Pashtun from Jalalabad, eastern Afghanistan
    Kevin Frayer / AP
    Slideshow (10) Soldiers of the Afghan National Army

Discuss:

Discussion comments

,

Most active discussions

  1. votes comments
  2. votes comments
  3. votes comments
  4. votes comments