Image: Maxine Waters
Pablo Martinez Monsivais  /  AP
Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif. said Friday that she has not violated House rules.
updated 8/13/2010 3:59:12 PM ET 2010-08-13T19:59:12

A defiant Maxine Waters disputed charges that she violated House ethics rules and released documents Friday that could undercut the complaint that the 10-term California Democrat sought federal money to bail out a bank where her husband owns stock.

With midterm elections three months away and no trial date scheduled by the House Ethics Committee, Waters — like her House colleague Charles Rangel of New York — made her case in the court of public opinion.

"I have not violated any House rules," the senior member of the House Financial Services Committee told a news conference that included a power-point presentation of the documents.

Waters is charged with three counts: violating a rule requiring lawmakers' conduct to reflect creditably on the House; violating the spirit and letter of a rule prohibiting receipt of benefits by exerting improper influence; and violating a government code of conduct that prohibits dispensing or receiving special favors.

Rangel defended himself in a rambling, 37-minute speech to the House on Tuesday and again on Thursday in at a news conference in New York against charges that he violated House ethics rules. He also cited the slowness of the ethics committee in setting a date for a trial.

Waters' primary defense is that she contacted former Secretary Henry Paulson Jr., in September 2008 about a meeting for the National Bankers Association — a trade group of minority-owned banks. She said she turned the matter over to Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., the Financial Services Committee chairman, after learning OneUnited Bank was the association member actually needing the aid.

The case appears to hinge on whether Waters was trying to help the association or OneUnited, a bank where the congresswoman's husband, Sidney Williams, owns stock. The bank is headquartered in Frank's Massachusetts district.

The investment of Waters' husband was worth more than $352,000 at the end of 2007. But by late September 2008 — the month when Waters says she was helping the trade association — the investment had declined to $175,000.

Several documents released by Waters show that the association, not OneUnited, wrote to Paulson for federal help. In one internal Treasury Department document, the head of the federal bailout program for financial institutions said he had no knowledge of congressional intervention when the decision was made to give OneUnited $12 million in December 2008.

Among the documents released by Waters:

—A Sept. 6, 2008 National Bankers Association letter to Treasury Secretary Paulson that set Waters' intervention in motion. It expressed concern that minority banks could suffer major losses from a government takeover of mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, because banks invested in the two failing companies.

  1. Other political news of note
    1. Animated Boehner: 'There's nothing complex about the Keystone Pipeline!'

      House Speaker John Boehner became animated Tuesday over the proposed Keystone Pipeline, castigating the Obama administration for not having approved the project yet.

    2. Budget deficits shrinking but set to grow after 2015
    3. Senate readies another volley on unemployment aid
    4. Obama faces Syria standstill
    5. Fluke files to run in California

It turned out that OneUnited was the only association member severely hurt by that investment, but Waters said she wasn't aware of that when she called Paulson on Sept. 8 on the association's behalf.

—Several other association e-mails, news releases and a letter around the time of the Treasury-trade association meeting on Sept. 9, indicating this was an association issue.

—Testimony to the House ethics committee from an official of the bank-regulating Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., Sandra Thompson. She said that despite problems with OneUnited's operations, she recommended to her superiors that OneUnited be placed on a track that would permit OneBank to get assistance.

—An Internal Treasury Department e-mail showing the head of the bailout program for financial institutions, Neel Kashkari, said the meeting set up by Waters played no role in the later decision to give OneUnited $12 million. In fact, the so-called Troubled Asset Relief Program hadn't even been established at the time of the meeting.

"We didn't even know about it," Kashkari he said, referring to the Treasury-minority association meeting.

—Numerous e-mails between Financial Services Committee staff members showing that Frank and his staff was dealing with Treasury in support of OneUnited. Those e-mails did not mention Waters.

Waters' problem is that in the meeting she arranged, the two association officials present also were executives of OneUnited.

Also, Frank told her to stop working on the OneUnited problem to avoid a conflict, and that he would handle it. The ethics committee said that warning came around the time Waters began working on the issue. Waters said it was weeks later. Frank says he can't remember the date.

At the news conference, Waters said she told Frank that because of her husband's investment, "I can't deal with that. I'm not going to be involved with that."

She said Frank responded, "Stay out of it. I'll take over."

The ethics committee said Waters did not back out, but had her grandson and chief of staff, Mikael Moore, pursue the matter. Moore, at the news conference, said he did nothing to get OneUnited the federal money and released an e-mail showing he only sent the bank the Treasury Department's draft bailout legislation.

Copyright 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Video: Rep. Waters on defense against ethics charges

  1. Closed captioning of: Rep. Waters on defense against ethics charges

    >>> and maxine waters has launched a detailed and passionate defense against several ethics charges against her. congresswoman waters is accused of helping a minority owned bank acquire $12 million in t.a.r.p. funds where her husband was a shareholder.

    >> i have not violated any house rules . i fully disclosed all of my financial information as requested by house rules and in fact went above and beyond what was required by repeatedly disclosing my and my husband's financial interests dois during financial services committee hearings.

    >> luke russert on capitol hill , soive congressman waters is describing what she was upfront about, why do her colleagues have questions, then?

    >> she went through refutals of why she feels the alleged violation is wrong. she essentially said that what she did in september of 2008 was contact the treasury department to set up a meeting between the national bankers association , which is a trade group which represents minority owned banks and the u.s. secretary of treasury north to provide some sort of funding so a lot of these banks would not collapse if they were having significant money issues. she says it's convince denl that the mba had direct connections to this bank, first united in which her husband had stock. after that she completely removed herg from the proceedings. she said the ethics committee , it's not fair for them to hang this sort of dark cloud of guilt, releasing a statement of violation over the course of a year, with things leaking in and out, and she would like to have a trial to clear her name. that's why she came to the airwaves this morning. another thing that she did touch on is that she said she had no direct contact with treasury officials with regards to that.

    >> no government agency or their representatives have ever said that i requested any special assistance or compensation for anyone or any institution or that i influenced the thought process in any way.

    >> and ms. waters seemed to show the press core e-mail that had their account. it's going to be interesting to see how her colleagues on the ethics committee responds to that in the trial. that if anything looks to be her best piece of evidence for proving her innocence in this process.

    >>> far from politics, but a


Discussion comments


Most active discussions

  1. votes comments
  2. votes comments
  3. votes comments
  4. votes comments