updated 10/2/2010 3:49:51 PM ET 2010-10-02T19:49:51

Free speech cases top the U.S. Supreme Court's docket as it begins a new term with a new justice and three women on the bench for the first time.

The court will look at provocative anti-gay protests at military funerals and a California law banning the sale of violent video games to children. These cases worry free speech advocates, who fear the court could limit First Amendment freedoms. The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees such basic rights as freedom of speech, religion and assembly.

The funeral protest lawsuit, over signs praising American war deaths, "is one of those cases that tests our commitment to the First Amendment," said Steven Shapiro, legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union.

    1. Hoffman withdrew $1,200 hours before death: sources

      Philip Seymour Hoffman withdrew a total of $1,200 from an ATM at a supermarket near his New York City apartment the night before he was found lifeless in his bathroom with a syringe still in his left arm, sources told NBC News.

    2. NYC mayor will skip St. Pat's parade over gay ban
    3. Indiana man back home 18 years after abduction
    4. 32 states in the path of another wild storm
    5. Judge vows quick ruling on Va. marriage ban

Another case involves a different aspect of the First Amendment, the government's relationship to religion. The justices will decide whether Arizona's income tax credit scholarship program, in essence, directs state money to religious schools in violation of the constitutional separation of church and state.

Story: Kagan takes her place on Supreme Court bench

Under Chief Justice John Roberts, marking his fifth anniversary on the court, and with the replacement of Justice Sandra Day O'Connor by Justice Samuel Alito, the court has been more sympathetic to arguments that blur the line between government and religion, as long as one religion is not favored over another.

Justice Elena Kagan, confirmed in August, is the one new face on the court, but nearly everyone will be sitting in different seats when the term opens on Monday.

Like so much else at the Supreme Court, the justices sit according to seniority, other than the chief justice at the center of the bench. The retirement of John Paul Stevens, who had served longer than the others, means Roberts now will be flanked by Justices Antonin Scalia and Anthony Kennedy.

Kagan and Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who joined the court last year, will sit at opposite ends of the bench. The woman with the longest tenure, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, also is now the senior liberal-leaning justice with Stevens gone.

Though it's never certain how changes will affect the court's direction, President Barack Obama said he was looking for someone in the mold of the liberal-leaning Stevens when he chose Kagan. If Kagan votes as Stevens did, her presence would not affect the ideological divide that has four justices on the conservative side, four on the liberal side and Kennedy in the middle, though more often with the conservatives.

Then, too, a justice's first term is not necessarily a good predictor of future performance. If anything, getting a read on Kagan in her first year may be even harder because her former job as Obama's solicitor general already has forced her to take herself out of 24 of the 51 cases the court has so far agreed to hear. The solicitor general is the top lawyer who argues the government's cases before the high court.

  1. Most popular

The first case from which she is withdrawing will be argued Monday, and Kagan will slip out of the courtroom before Roberts invites the lawyers to begin their argument.

Kagan's absences create the potential for the eight remaining justices to split 4-4 in some cases. That outcome leaves in place the decision reached by the most recent court to have the case, but leaves unsettled the issue the high court was set to resolve.

A second Arizona law, imposing penalties on businesses that hire illegal immigrants, also is before the court this term. At issue is whether the state law intrudes into an area, immigration, that really is the federal government's responsibility.

The result at the Supreme Court could signal how the court might resolve another suit working its way through the federal courts over the Arizona immigration law that puts local police officers on the front lines of enforcing federal immigration law, said Brian Wolfman, a Georgetown University law professor.

  1. Other political news of note
    1. Animated Boehner: 'There's nothing complex about the Keystone Pipeline!'

      House Speaker John Boehner became animated Tuesday over the proposed Keystone Pipeline, castigating the Obama administration for not having approved the project yet.

    2. Budget deficits shrinking but set to grow after 2015
    3. Senate readies another volley on unemployment aid
    4. Obama faces Syria standstill
    5. Fluke files to run in California

Several cases that pit consumers against business also revolve around when federal law trumps state action. In one case, parents of a child who suffered severe, lasting damage from a vaccine want to use state law to sue a drugmaker, even though Congress has established a special court to hear disputes over vaccines.

The business community is asking the court to rein in the use of class actions in suits and arbitrations in state courts. Plaintiffs often can force large settlements without a trial if they succeed in pooling the claims of everyone who might be affected.

Wal-Mart Stores Inc., backed by many business groups, wants the court to toss out an enormous class-action sex discrimination suit over allegations that it pays women less than men and promotes women less frequently. The case could involve millions of women who once worked at the world's largest private employer.

In recent years, the start of a new term has been accompanied by speculation over who might soon retire. The same nine justices served together from 1994 to 2005, an unusually long period of stability. Since 2005, four new justices have joined the court.

The oldest justice is Ginsburg, at 77. Scalia and Kennedy are 74, while Justice Stephen Breyer is 72.

Ginsburg has said she intends to stay on the court for five more years or so, and the other three septuagenarians have given no indication they are leaving anytime soon.

Copyright 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Video: Military funeral fight to kick off high court’s term

  1. Transcript of: Military funeral fight to kick off high court’s term

    LESTER HOLT, anchor: Tomorrow is the first Monday in October , the start of a new term for the Supreme Court , and it promises to be a busy one. First up, a controversial case involving the rights of protesters at military funerals. Joining us from the court with a preview is NBC 's justice correspondent Pete Williams . Hi , Pete .

    PETE WILLIAMS reporting: Lester , for the second year in a row this court has a new lineup with Elena Kagan bringing to three the number of women on the bench. As for the cases, some of the most prominent of this term test the limits of free speech. One of the biggest cases involves protesters who claim that all US war deaths are God 's punishment for the military's tolerance of gay service members. When they brought that message to the funeral of of Matthew Snyder , a Marine who died in Iraq , they carried signs that said, quote, " Thank God for dead soldiers."

    Mr. ALBERT SNYDER (Marine's Father): How could anybody to this to another human being? They're animals, is what they are.

    WILLIAMS: Matthew Snyder 's father said it permanently tarnished his memory of the funeral.

    Mr. SNYDER: We had to have a SWAT team . There were ambulances. There were fire engines. There was a command central set up in a Winnebago . There -- they turned it into a circus.

    WILLIAMS: So he sued the protest organizer, Fred Phelps of Kansas . But a federal court declared it constitutionally protected speech. Phelps and his family say they'll continue picketing.

    Mr. FRED PHELPS (Funeral Protester): God is punishing these soldiers, punishing their parents, really. And the parents ought to be very thankful for me to tell them this.

    WILLIAMS: California urges the court to rule that it can block minors from buying violent video games . Advocates say playing them makes children aggressive.

    Mr. TIM WINTER (Parents Television Council): They tend to live in fear of the circumstances around them unnecessarily. They tend to resort to violence as a solution for conflict.

    WILLIAMS: But the courts have never upheld limits on violent expression, and video game makers say the law is unnecessary.

    Mr. PAUL SMITH (Attorney for Video Game Makers): The state is claiming the power to be the sort of super nanny and tell parents what they should and should not allow their kids to do and see. And that is a very dangerous concept.

    WILLIAMS: As for the court's newest member, Elena Kagan will sit out nearly a third of the cases this term to avoid conflicts from her time at the Justice Department .

    Mr. TOM GOLDSTEIN (Supreme Court Expert): With only eight members of the court deciding these cases, there's the chance of a tie. If that happens, the Supreme Court 's not actually going to be able to decide the issue and will have to come back again in another case, probably in another year.

    WILLIAMS: Here's how much this court has changed in the past five years: four new justices. But assuming no big health problems, no retirements are


Discussion comments


Most active discussions

  1. votes comments
  2. votes comments
  3. votes comments
  4. votes comments