Image: U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Sen. Carl Levin briefs on the investigation into private security contractors in Afghanistan.
Alex Wong  /  Getty Images
U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Sen. Carl Levin speaks during a news conference on Capitol Hill on Thursday. Levin held a news conference to brief the media on the inquiry by the committee into the role and oversight of Department of Defense's private security contractors in Afghanistan. news services
updated 10/7/2010 9:37:56 PM ET 2010-10-08T01:37:56

Heavy U.S. reliance on private security in Afghanistan has helped to line the pockets of the Taliban because contractors often don't vet local recruits and wind up hiring warlords and thugs, Senate investigators said Thursday.

The finding, in a report by the Senate Armed Services Committee, follows a separate congressional inquiry in June that concluded trucking contractors pay tens of millions of dollars a year to local warlords for convoy protection.

Read the full Senate report on Afghan contractors (PDF)

Sen. Carl Levin, chairman of the Senate panel, said he is worried the U.S. is unknowingly fostering the growth of Taliban-linked militias at a time when Kabul is struggling to recruit its own soldiers and police officers.

"Almost all are Afghans. Almost all are armed," Levin, a Michigan Democrat, said of the army of young men working under U.S. contracts.

'Need to shut off the spigot'
"We need to shut off the spigot of U.S. dollars flowing into the pockets of warlords and power brokers who act contrary to our interests and contribute to the corruption that weakens the support of the Afghan people for their government," he added.

The Defense Department doesn't necessarily disagree but warns that firing the estimated 26,000 private security personnel operating in Afghanistan in the near future isn't practical.

Story: Marines in Marjah find 'firefights all over'

This summer, U.S. forces in Afghanistan pledged to increase their oversight of security contractors and set up two task forces to look into allegations of misconduct and to track the money spent, particularly among lower-level subcontractors.

The Defense Contract Management Agency has increased the number of auditors and support staff in the region by some 300 percent since 2007. And in September, Gen. David Petraeus, the top war commander in Afghanistan, directed his staff to consider the impact that contract spending has on military operations.

But military officials and Republicans on the Senate Armed Services Committee warn that ending the practice of hiring local guards could worsen the security situation in Afghanistan.

They say providing young Afghan men with employment can prevent them from joining the ranks of Taliban fighters. And bringing in foreign workers to do jobs Afghans can do is likely to foster resentment, they say.

Also, contract security forces fill an immediate need at a time when U.S. forces are focused on operations, commanders say.

"As the security environment in Afghanistan improves, our need for (private security contractors) will diminish," Petraeus told the Senate panel in July. "But in the meantime, we will use legal, licensed and controlled (companies) to accomplish appropriate missions."

Improved vetting urged
Levin says he isn't suggesting that the U.S. stop using private security contractors altogether. But, he adds, the U.S. must reduce the number of local security guards and improve the vetting process of new hires if there's any hope of reversing a trend that he says damages the U.S. mission in Afghanistan.

His report represents the broadest look at Defense Department security contracts so far, with a review of 125 of these agreements between 2007 and 2009.

    1. Castaway's parents thought they would never see him again

      The father of Pacific castaway Jose Salvador Alvarenga said he was told his long-lost son vanished on a fishing trip but he didn’t have the heart to break the news to his ailing wife.

    2. Scotland legalizes same-sex marriage
    3. Weapons deal strengthened Assad: US intel chief
    4. Outcry over the fate of Sochi's stray dogs
    5. Olympic construction leaves Sochi residents in the cold
The review concludes there were "systemic failures" in the management of the contracts, including "widespread" failures "to adequately vet, train and supervise armed security personnel."

Richard Fontaine, a senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security, told Reuters that the committee report "fills out a picture many have already suspected -- that taxpayer dollars in Afghanistan at times end up in the hands of those we are fighting."

"It is another wake-up call that the U.S. needs to take aggressive steps to get a better handle on contractors and subcontractors in Afghanistan," said Fontaine, who authored a June report on contracting.

"Getting a better handle on who is doing what, with what money and where that money is going, should be priority number one," he said.

The panel's report highlights two cases in which security contracting firms ArmorGroup and EOD Technology relied on personnel linked to the Taliban.

Last week, EOD Technology was one of eight security firms hired by the State Department under a $10 billion contract to provide protection for diplomats.

In the case of ArmorGroup, the Senate panel says the company repeatedly relied on warlords to find local guards, including the uncle of a known Taliban commander. The uncle, nicknamed "Mr. White" by ArmorGroup after a character in Quentin Tarantino's 1992 gangster movie "Reservoir Dogs," was eventually killed after a U.S. raid that uncovered a cache of weapons, including anti-tank landmines.

According to The New York Times, the movie nicknames were because military personnel did not even know the names of the leaders of the Afghan groups providing security for an American airbase in western Afghanistan. Another leader was nicknamed "Mr. Pink" from Reservoir Dogs, investigators said.

ArmorGroup, based in McLean, Va., lost a separate contract this year protecting the U.S. Embassy in Kabul after allegations surfaced that guards engaged in lewd behavior and sexual misconduct at their living quarters.

Susan Pitcher, a spokeswoman for Wackenhut Services, ArmorGroup's parent company, said the company only engaged workers from local villages upon the "recommendation and encouragement" of U.S. special operations troops.

Pitcher said that ArmorGroup stayed in "close contact" with the military personnel "to ensure that the company was constantly acting in harmony with, and in support of, U.S. military interests and desires."

Allegation not new
The allegation that contractors rely on warlords for local hiring is not new. Last June, a Democratic House investigation led by Massachusetts Rep. John Tierney concluded that trucking companies had "little choice" but to pay local warlords "in what amounts to a vast protection racket."

Reporting by The New York Times also described bribes being paid by contractors to the Taliban and other warlords to ensure supplies for the U.S. military were allowed safe passage.

Army criminal investigators are examining the allegations, specifically looking at whether companies hired under a $2 billion Pentagon contract to transport food, water, fuel and ammunition to troops were paying up to $4 million a week to insurgent groups.

In August, Afghan President Hamid Karzai announced that private security contractors would have to cease operations by the end of the year. The workers, he said, would have to either join the government security forces or stop work because they were undermining Afghanistan's police and army and contributing to corruption.

U.S. officials responded that they shared the goal but wanted to move slow enough that military efforts weren't impacted.

Levin said he blames the problems with contractor oversight in part on the lack of attention given to the war by the Bush administration — an assertion Republicans dispute.

Led by Arizona Sen. John McCain, committee Republicans endorsed the investigative findings in a voice vote last month. But in a statement included in the report, they said Levin's investigation "falls short of providing a more robust discussion of how slim our options were at the time."

The Associated Press and Reuters contributed to this report.

Video: Tallying the toll of war

  1. Closed captioning of: Tallying the toll of war

    >>> it was less than a month after 9/11. president george w. bush went on television to announce that the war in afghanistan was under way. that was nine years ago tonight and the war continues. more than 1,200 americans have been killed in afghanistan. more than 8,500 wounded. the cost to u.s. taxpayers in money, $336 billion. any kind of accurate number of afghan civil deaths is harder to come by. no real count exists for the first five years of the war. but since '06, the u.n. says nearly 7,000 have been killed. the

Interactive: Nine years of war

  1. Above: Interactive Nine years of war
  2. Map Afghan supply lines


Discussion comments


Most active discussions

  1. votes comments
  2. votes comments
  3. votes comments
  4. votes comments