Image: Cargo plane in Philadelphia
Matt Rourke  /  AP
Investigators board a United Parcel Service jet isolated on a runway at Philadelphia International Airport on Friday after parcels containing explosives were intercepted in Dubai and Britain.
By Mike Brunker Projects Team editor
updated 10/29/2010 11:50:41 PM ET 2010-10-30T03:50:41

U.S. authorities on Friday said they were tightening screening of air cargo in the wake of incidents in which packages from Yemen containing explosives triggered a worldwide security scare.

But aviation insiders say that even with the additional measures, only a small percentage of the air freight originating overseas is likely to be examined before it arrives at U.S airports.

The Department of Homeland Security said it had “taken a number of steps to enhance security” in the wake of the incidents late Thursday and early Friday, in which two packages described as copy machine toner cartridges containing white powder and wires were intercepted after being shipped from Yemen for destinations in the U.S.

  1. Related content
    1. NYT: Saudis step up global security role
    2. Bomb plot prompts another look at Dubai crash
    3. Yemen’s rising radical star
    4. Air cargo seen as weak spot in security net
    5. How your brain handles terrorism scares
    6. Newsweek: Al-Awlaki in Yemen a new bin Laden?

President Barack Obama later said the packages “apparently did contain explosive material” and constituted a “credible terrorist threat” against the U.S.

Homeland Security announced plans to implement additional security measures several hours before Obama’s comments.

“The public may recognize specific enhancements including heightened cargo screening and additional security at airports,” it said. “Passengers should continue to expect an unpredictable mix of security layers that include explosives trace detection, advanced imaging technology, canine teams and pat downs, among others. As always, we remind the public to remain vigilant and report suspicious activity to local law enforcement."

The additional cargo screening will extend anti-terrorism measures in an area that some experts say remains a weak link in the security chain.

The federal government already has more scrutiny for air cargo that travels on passenger planes.

Congress in 2007 passed legislation mandating that the Transportation Security Administration require air freight carriers to screen or physically inspect cargo loaded in the bellies of passenger planes at U.S. airports or bound for U.S. destinations. The law stipulated that 100 percent compliance be achieved by August 2010 under the oversight of the TSA, which monitors the program but performs no screening itself.

But freight traveling on cargo-only planes is not subjected to the same level of scrutiny. That’s because cargo jets have been considered unlikely terrorist targets, since attacks would claim only a few lives.

“Nobody would care,” said one former air cargo pilot, who spoke with on condition of anonymity.

Video: Photos of suspicious Yemeni device (on this page)

As a result, said the former pilot and another expert familiar with air cargo procedures, also speaking on condition of anonymity, cargo picked up overseas for delivery to the U.S. depends largely on a system of mutual trust.

“They cannot check everything,” the ex-captain said, referring to U.S. cargo fliers such as DHL, FedEx and UPS. “They develop relationships with different suppliers, and they expect whoever is bringing it to the freight carrier to have checked and be sure where it came from. … Pretty much everyone trusts that the person before them has done the vetting.”

But as demonstrated by Friday's incidents, in which the two intercepted packages containing explosives reportedly were addressed to a synagogue and a Jewish community center in Chicago, such a system could enable terrorists to indirectly mount attacks far from home.

The TSA is attempting to reduce the risk from inbound international cargo by, among other things, creating a certification program for screeners.

But Rep. Edward J. Markey, D-Mass., who after the 9/11 attacks led the drive for laws requiring the screening of aircraft belly cargo and has introduced legislation requiring TSA to establish its own cargo screening facilities, said additional legislation also may be required.

Video: Obama: Devices apparently explosive (on this page)

“I will explore the need for legislation to mandate screening for air carriers that transport only cargo” in light of the air scare, he said in a statement issued Friday.

Any additional security measures would likely run into strong resistance from air cargo companies, including overseas carriers.

Some foreign-based carriers already are chafing under the U.S.-required security programs, saying that they increase overhead and cause delays.

British Airways Chairman Martin Broughton said at a conference Tuesday in Britain that the U.K. government should not “kowtow to the Americans every time they wanted something done” regarding aviation security.

  1. Only on
    1. OWN via Getty Images
      From belief to betrayal: How America fell for Armstrong
    2. pool via Reuters file
      US to Syria neighbors: Be ready to act on WMDs
    3. China: One-child policy is here to stay
    4. NRA: Practice Range
      New 'Practice Range' shooter game says it’s from NRA
    5. 'Gifted' priest indicted in crystal meth case
    6. AFP - Getty Images
      China's state media admits to air pollution crisis
    7. AFP - Getty Images
      French to send 1,000 more troops to Mali

According to the Financial Times, Broughton particularly criticized the requirement that passengers take off their shoes and remove laptops from their luggage during security checks and said the practice should be abandoned.

But whatever the resistance, changes in the way air cargo is handled are almost certain, said the former cargo pilot.

“It’s been almost like an old boys network,” he said of the current system of handling international shipments. “Clearly that’s not going to work anymore.”

"Fan" Mike Brunker on Facebook.

© 2013 Reprints

Video: Cargo scare highlights 'inept' terror attempt

  1. Transcript of: Cargo scare highlights 'inept' terror attempt

    BRIAN WILLIAMS, anchor: Michael Sheehan is a veteran terrorism analyst, Richard Engel our chief foreign affairs corespondent. Both with us here to talk about this. Richard , beginning with you. You called this on the air today perhaps an attempt to discombobulate. You compared it to your time in Iraq when there would be fake IEDs by the side of the road for the purpose of watching to see how the American military responded.

    RICHARD ENGEL reporting: Well, this kind of attack has a very low probability of success. You're sending a device...

    WILLIAMS: Almost inept.

    ENGEL: I think too inept. It doesn't make sense. You're sending something suspicious, addressing it to a synagogue. You know you're going to get caught. You know that red flags are going to go up all over the world . You're sending something that has been tampered with from Yemen to a synagogue. So the question is, is the intention to create harm to that synagogue or is it to create a big diversion? And a lot of attention has been focused on this today that ties the United States up. It costs money. This attack, or this diversion maybe cost a couple hundred dollars to do, and how -- look how much attention has been focused on this today. And then by sitting back and watching it happen, you can learn a lot.

    WILLIAMS: Michael , I think it's fair to say you had a more skeptical view today, applying your years with the NYPD , your years advising the feds. This reminded you of really nothing.

    Mr. MICHAEL SHEEHAN (NBC News Terrorism Analyst): Right. This was another case -- well, first of all, it does remind me they're still out there, still very focused on civil aviation , but also incompetence again being demonstrated by al-Qaeda . Even if it is just trying to scare us, they again show ineptitude in bomb-making capability. And in this case, the intelligence services of Saudi Arabia picked up on this cell. So even if they were just trying to scare us, you know, that doesn't -- that just only flies so far.

    WILLIAMS: So this could be but one face of modern terrorism , terrorism , of course, that's still capable of a spectacular act against us.

    Mr. SHEEHAN: Oh, clearly, and that's their intent, Brian . But I don't think we should project too much on al-Qaeda , that they're -- because they've been lowered to these half-baked attacks that they're somehow -- this is a thoughtful way of just scaring us in that way or diverting a resource. Actually civil aviation kept going. Yes, a lot of bomb squads and police were sent to the scene, but our country kept moving. It didn't divert us. I think this is a failed operation by al-Qaeda . It reminds us to keep vigilant, but we shouldn't amplify their failures into things that are scaring us unduly.

    WILLIAMS: All right. All right. Mike Sheehan , Richard Engel , two guys who have been on this story all day and know the region very well and the subject matter, thanks.


Discussion comments


Most active discussions

  1. votes comments
  2. votes comments
  3. votes comments
  4. votes comments