Video: Conservative wave washes over midterms

  1. Transcript of: Conservative wave washes over midterms

    MATT LAUER, co-host: Let's begin with David Gregory , moderator of " Meet the Press ." He's been following the events all night long and I do mean all night long. David , good morning.

    DAVID GREGORY reporting: What a night. What a night and what a story. Plain and simple , the American electorate has lurched back to the right, voting its anxiety about the economy and its frustration with Washington . At the polls, a split decision. Powered by the tea party , the Republicans stormed back to power in the House , firing Speaker Nancy Pelosi . But in the Senate , Democrats held the majority after GOP pickups fell several short of the 10 needed for a takeover. For President Obama now, it is time for a reset.

    Representative JOHN BOEHNER: I've spent my whole life chasing the American dream .

    GREGORY: An emotional high for Ohio Republican John Boehner , the man likely to replace Nancy Pelosi as the next speaker of the House . He held back tears, addressing supporters after a triumphant night for House Republicans.

    Rep. BOEHNER: Now we're witnessing a repudiation of Washington , a repudiation of big government and a repudiation of politicians who refuse to listen to the American people .

    GREGORY: But the Democratic leader in the Senate , Harry Reid , had his own reason to celebrate, narrowly winning re-election in Nevada after escaping a near-death encounter with the tea party .

    Senator HARRY REID (Democrat, Nevada): The bell that just rang isn't the end of the fight, it's the start of the next round.

    GREGORY: Still, the conservative insurgency made its mark.

    Senator-elect RAND PAUL: There's a tea party tidal wave.

    GREGORY: Tea party candidate Rand Paul won an open Senate seat in Kentucky after a particularly bruising fight. Also winning, the 39-year-old Cuban-American Marco Rubio in Florida . Exit polls reveal that the energized tea party voters turned out in droves.

    LESTER HOLT reporting: The impact of the tea party was larger than some predicted. Forty percent nationwide said they're for the tea party ; 31 percent are opposed. What do they want? Eighty-five percent want to limit government ; just 12 percent think it should do more.

    Ms. SARAH PALIN: Train's leaving the station and the president and his advisers and his colleagues and supporters can jump on board that train.

    GREGORY: Many viewed the election as a test for former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin and the power of her political endorsement. Yet the Palin effect wasn't all positive.

    Ms. CHRISTINE O'DONNELL: We were victorious because the Delaware political system will never be the same .

    GREGORY: Her backing of novice conservative Christine O'Donnell over a more established Republican handed the Delaware Senate seat to the Democrat, Chris Coons . Still unknown, the result in Palin 's home state of Alaska , where the Senate race is too close to call, thanks to a strong showing by write-in candidate Lisa Murkowski .

    Senator LISA MURKOWSKI: What is so important is to make sure that every single Alaskan voter is heard, and we're going to make sure that that process is attended to.

    GREGORY: Besides Reid , Democrats could point to some other important Senate victories. In West Virginia , Governor Joe Manchin triumphed over an insurgent Republican rival to fill that seat. And Barbara Boxer held on to her seat in California . Those wins preserve Democratic rule in the Senate after vulnerable incumbents Russ Feingold of Wisconsin and Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas were sent home. And another high-profile loss in Illinois , where Republican Mark Kirk captured the seat previously held by President Obama .

    Unidentified Man: We've gone through a period where we say government should be doing more. At this stage of the game, the American public is drawing back a little bit and saying 'I don't know how much government should do.'

    GREGORY: And a huge driver last night, the almighty independent voter , that voting bloc swinging back to the Republican Party by a margin of 55-to-40. A huge wave here powerful enough to take down some veteran members of the Democratic Party in Congress . James Oberstar , Transportation Committee chairman from Minnesota , going back to the Watergate days. John Spratt , the Budget Committee chairman, had seen waves before but survived them. Ike Skelton , recruited by Harry Truman in Missouri , he was taken under as well. It's now time for the president to take stock and react. He will do that

updated 11/3/2010 9:21:11 AM ET 2010-11-03T13:21:11

The Democrats’ ambitious health care overhaul is facing roadblocks from newly elected state officials who harshly criticized it while campaigning and who are now in a position to make good on their promises.

In at least 10 states, including Kansas, Tennessee and Oklahoma, Republicans replaced Democrats in governors’ mansions.  The GOP also picked up seats in legislatures in many states. In the four races for state insurance commissioner, two went to candidates opposed to the law, while voters in California picked a Democrat in favor of it. One incumbent ran unchallenged.

    1. 2016 Health Law Enrollment Tops 11.3M
    2. Viewpoints: Jeb Bush On His Family’s Addiction Crisis; Don’t Penalize Doctors For Prostate Tests

GOP gubernatorial winners included Sam Brownback of Kansas, who called the reform law "an abomination." Tennessee’s governor-elect, Bill Haslam, said the law is an "intolerable expansion" of federal power and a "reminder of the incredible arrogance of Washington."

Story: After 'shellacking,' Obama laments disconnect with voters

In Ohio, former House Budget Committee Chairman John Kasich defeated Democratic incumbent Ted Strickland, after criticizing the law as doing nothing to control costs and “giving bureaucrats more control over our personal health care decisions.”  Republicans also took control of the legislature.

In Wyoming, the election of Republican gubernatorial candidate Matt Mead could have significant implications for the health law in that state, since he will have the power to appoint the attorney general and insurance commissioner. Mead says Wyoming cannot afford its share of the funding necessary to expand Medicaid.

While unable to overturn the federal law, the newly elected officials will be under pressure to act. They could lean on congressional delegations to repeal or change the legislation, seek waivers from some of its provisions, veto state legislation related to it and appoint like-minded people to important positions, such as insurance commissioner slots.

At the very least, states may opt to slow implementation, while Republican lawmakers look ahead to the 2012 presidential election.

  1. Don't miss these Health stories
    1. Splash News
      More women opting for preventive mastectomy - but should they be?

      Rates of women who are opting for preventive mastectomies, such as Angeline Jolie, have increased by an estimated 50 percent in recent years, experts say. But many doctors are puzzled because the operation doesn't carry a 100 percent guarantee, it's major surgery -- and women have other options, from a once-a-day pill to careful monitoring.

    2. Larry Page's damaged vocal cords: Treatment comes with trade-offs
    3. Report questioning salt guidelines riles heart experts
    4. CDC: 2012 was deadliest year for West Nile in US
    5. What stresses moms most? Themselves, survey says

"If the Republican governors were to get together and say ‘we’re going to derail this train,’ they could do much more to reverse the national health [law] than an effort to repeal it in Congress," said Ross Baker, a political science professor at Rutgers University. "The governors could, without defying federal law, simply implement it inefficiently, throw sand in the gears."

To be sure, some political observers say that as the dust settles, even governors who vehemently opposed the bill may realize if they don’t act in key areas – such as establishing health insurance marketplaces – the federal government will do it for them. In addition, the new law includes federal funding to expand the Medicaid program and grants to set up or bolster other programs, including public health. Governors may be reluctant to turn down the money.

Story: 'Hurricane' ends Democrats' control of House

While Congress may end up in gridlock, the law requires state officials to make decisions in several key areas during the next few years, with lasting impacts on consumers, insurers, state finances, employers and the uninsured.

  1. Don't miss these Health stories
    1. Splash News
      More women opting for preventive mastectomy - but should they be?

      Rates of women who are opting for preventive mastectomies, such as Angeline Jolie, have increased by an estimated 50 percent in recent years, experts say. But many doctors are puzzled because the operation doesn't carry a 100 percent guarantee, it's major surgery -- and women have other options, from a once-a-day pill to careful monitoring.

    2. Larry Page's damaged vocal cords: Treatment comes with trade-offs
    3. Report questioning salt guidelines riles heart experts
    4. CDC: 2012 was deadliest year for West Nile in US
    5. What stresses moms most? Themselves, survey says

States must decide whether to set up their own insurance marketplaces, called exchanges, and whether to grant state regulators more authority, such as the power to review and reject premium increases before consumers start paying the new rates. One of the most difficult steps will be planning how to enroll millions of newly eligible low-income residents into Medicaid programs starting in 2014.

Obama administration officials say most states are already working to carry out the law – and they expect that will continue no matter how power may have shifted in Tuesday’s election.

Still, with state budget pressures and other concerns, "you are going to see push back … and demands for changes to the legislation to give them more flexibility and control," said Grace-Marie Turner, president of the Galen Institute, a conservative, free-market research group.

Even before the election, some elected officials moved to block or slow the legislation, including Republican Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty.

In Florida, the incoming House speaker Dean Cannon wrote Gov. Charlie Crist in October cautioning that the legislative branch, not the executive, would be setting the framework for applying the law. And 20 states have already joined a Florida lawsuit to overturn the law on constitutional grounds.

Brownback has said he wants Kansas to join a lawsuit challenging the health overhaul. Taking that step will pit state residents against their former governor, Kathleen Sebelius, now the secretary of Health and Human Services, who is crafting key regulations needed to launch the law’s many provisions.

Story: Health insurance mandate on ballot in 3 states

Kansans also re-elected Insurance Commissioner Sandy Praeger, a moderate Republican who beat back a challenge in the primary and ran unopposed Tuesday. Along with a number of other state commissioners, Praeger has played a key role in helping craft new rules that will affect the health law in her role as a leader in the National Association of Insurance Commissioners.

Praeger sees many upsides in the law for Kansas, including the expansion of Medicaid in 2014 to low-income working adults with no children. They currently don’t qualify for Medicaid in her state and many others, no matter how little their income.

"There’s been so much rhetoric about 'Obamacare' and not liking this law, that we have a steep learning curve in terms of pointing out to state legislators and new governors all the benefits," Praeger said.

No matter which party is in charge, state officials face a number of decisions:

Creating Exchanges
State GOP leaders could refuse to set up and run health insurance exchanges, marketplaces where consumers shop for health insurance coverage. But if the states don’t do it, the federal government will do it for them. And many governors and insurance commissioners may balk at that.

States also determine how exchanges operate. They could, for example, allow all insurers in the market to offer their wares, just as Utah now does. Or they could be more selective, allowing only those that pass muster with the state or with an appointed group, as is currently done in Massachusetts.

Even Republican governors most critical of the law will likely want to set up their own insurance exchanges, said Michael Leavitt, who was secretary of Health and Human Services under President George W. Bush, and is now advising states on the matter. "My guess is that folks in Wyoming might not be enthusiastic about the federal government running an exchange in their state."

Overseeing Insurers
The new law calls for states to work with the federal government to establish ways to review what are deemed "unreasonable" premium increases, but it is up to the states to decide what to do about such increases. Many states currently do not give regulators veto power over premiums, although they can exert pressure on insurers. A handful of states allow insurers to file their new rates with waiting for any review.

State lawmakers must decide whether to boost their state insurance commissioner’s authority to reject premium increases or leave current law in place. Praeger, the Kansas commissioner, expects there will be pressure from the public – and from the federal government – to increase such authority. But there will be pressure not to, as well.

  1. Most popular
    1. The Week in Pictures

"Republicans tend to be less regulatory minded, so it may be more difficult in those states to get that additional rate-approval authority," said Praeger, whose own office does not have prior approval authority over rates, but does have substantial review power.

Under the new law, insurers must spend at least 80 percent of their revenue on direct medical care or issue rebates to consumers. Regulations outlining what is considered medical care – and how to issue refunds – are awaiting final approval by the Department of Health and Human Services.

States can seek an exemption from the rules if they fear that meeting them could cause severe disruptions in the market for individual coverage. Maine, which is served by very few insurers, has already said it would seek an exemption and more states are expected to follow.

Skip federal funding?
Another complication: Most states have already sought and accepted millions in federal grants to help increase scrutiny of premium increases, bolster consumer assistance offices and design health insurance exchanges. States that discontinue those programs would forfeit grant money in future years.

Story: Alcohol more dangerous than heroin, cocaine, study finds

Still, not all states sought funding. Minnesota and Alaska, for example, did not seek money to begin planning for state-based exchanges. Wyoming, Iowa, Georgia and Minnesota also did not seek funding to boost insurance premium review efforts.

More grants will be available in 2011, including funding for community health centers.

But elected officials may run into trouble with voters if their actions are seen as letting insurers off the hook for some of the law’s popular provisions, such as a bar on rejecting applicants with medical problems.

"If they are seen as a subsidiary of the insurance industry, that’s not good for them politically," says Jonathan Oberlander, professor of social medicine and health policy at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill.

Marilyn Werber Serafini contributed to this story.

© 2012 This information was reprinted with permission from KHN. Kaiser Health News is an editorially independent program of the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonprofit, nonpartisan health policy research and communication organization not affiliated with Kaiser Permanente.


Discussion comments


Most active discussions

  1. votes comments
  2. votes comments
  3. votes comments
  4. votes comments