Image: Rober Gates in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Bazuki Muhammad  /  Reuters
U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates suggested that U.S. troops might stay longer in Iraq following a meeting with defense officials in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
updated 11/9/2010 7:51:47 AM ET 2010-11-09T12:51:47

The United States is open to the idea of keeping troops in Iraq past a deadline to leave next year if Iraq asks for it, U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Tuesday.

"We'll stand by," Gates said. "We're ready to have that discussion if and when they want to raise it with us."

Gates urged Iraq's squabbling political groups to reconcile after eight months of deadlock. Any request to extend the U.S. military presence in Iraq would have to come from a functioning Iraqi government. It would amend the current agreement under which U.S. troops must leave by the end of 2011.

"That initiative clearly needs to come from the Iraqis; we are open to discussing it," Gates said.

  1. Most popular

U.S. and Iraqi officials have said for months that they expect Iraqi leaders to eventually ask for an extension of the military agreement with the U.S., but the political impasse has put the idea on hold.

A spike in violence in Iraq over the past two weeks has underscored the continued potency of al-Qaida and other Sunni extremists.

Story: Car bombs in Iraqi Shiite cities kill 21

"We have been pretty clear to the Iraqis that what we seek, and hope they will come together on, is an inclusive government that represents all of the major elements of Iraqi society and in a nonsectarian way," Gates said. "It is our hope that that is the direction they are moving in."

He spoke following a meeting with Malaysian Defense Minister Ahmad Zahid Hamidi.

New government needs time
Leaders of Iraq's major political blocs met Monday for the first time since parliamentary elections in March. The 90-minute televised session, the start of three days of talks, did not lead to a breakthrough.

The battle is largely a contest between the Iranian-favored coalition of Shiite Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki and followers of anti-American cleric Muqtada al-Sadr against a Sunni-backed secular coalition led by former Prime Minister Ayad Allawi.

    1. Castaway's parents thought they would never see him again

      The father of Pacific castaway Jose Salvador Alvarenga said he was told his long-lost son vanished on a fishing trip but he didn’t have the heart to break the news to his ailing wife.

    2. Scotland legalizes same-sex marriage
    3. Weapons deal strengthened Assad: US intel chief
    4. Outcry over the fate of Sochi's stray dogs
    5. Olympic construction leaves Sochi residents in the cold

At stake is whether Iraq has an inclusive government of both the majority Shiites and the minority Sunnis, or a Shiite-dominated government with the Sunnis largely in opposition — a recipe that many worry will turn the country back to the sectarian violence of a few years ago.

Al-Maliki's bloc won 89 seats in the March 7 election, compared with 91 for Allawi's coalition; neither side won the majority of seats needed to govern.

Gates said he has not spoken directly to any of the political leaders, but other U.S. officials, including Vice President Joe Biden, have been heavily engaged.

Gates predicted that a new government would need some time before asking the U.S. to extend the troop plan.

Although the 2011 deadline was a point of pride for Iraq after years of U.S. military occupation, it does not leave much time for the U.S. to train Iraq's fledgling air force. Iraq also wants more U.S. help to protect its borders.

Copyright 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Video: Memoir: Bush defends decision to invade Iraq

  1. Closed captioning of: Memoir: Bush defends decision to invade Iraq

    >> wednesday. william cohen is former defense secretary under bill clinton and heads the group. i'm just getting through it because it's not supposed to go through until tonight. we have copies from washington. not fair to ask you very much about it. you know the history of scooter libby . he was an assistant to the president . he was a key figure in the run up to the war in iraq . it's fascinating that this was the one issue and we also decided fiercely over the decision in the mid-term elections. donald rumsfeld .

    >> there was a series of things that took place in the second term of president bush . obviously the president felt strongly he should not grant a pardon and in addition that, there was an element whether the perception is fair or not that the initial phases of the bush administration first term that the vice president was much more in charge of things than he may have been. the perception was that it was vice president cheney . in the second term, president bush was determined to show he was in charge and this may have factored in on the pardon, but it was clear that there were serious decisions made in terms of that and other issues relating to how the war should be conducted.

    >> the book is very, very touching on the subject of the former president dealing with his alcohol and said he had an addictive personality. it's heart felt and very interesting. now to the current president and his trip in india , you know the leaders there well. his toke us has been on the economic side. that plays well back at home. they tried to reframe the trip, but pakistan and telling india they have to come to grips with the relationship and that's the critical link pin to stabilizing. how hard of a sell is that to india and pakistan ?

    >> it's a tough job for the president. number one, this trip involves not only the commercial relationship with india and 10.2 billion people and the potential consumer base for the american manufacturers and business community . the strategic relationship is critical. the relationship necessarily involves pakistan and you can see the division that is taking place. on the hand the indians have been critical of president obama because we are supporting pakistan economically and also with the military equipment. they see that as under cutting the security. if you look at the trip, the president is going to india , not pakistan . the pakastanis are saying why won't you come to our country and discriminating against pakistan . it's a fine line to show that india has a major stake in resolving that dispute that currently exists and has existed for sometime. if the united states can help, the president has to make it clear accident we are not trying to intervene and push either party other than saying hopefully you can reach a resolution that's on your own. the indians and the pakastanis will have serious objections.

    >> what is the chance that he can get either pakistan or this this instance india to deal with resolving disputes and focusing on the terrorists?

    >> i think both the pakastanis and the indians it has to come with a resolution otherwise you run the risk of what the insurgents and al qaeda continue to be destructive inside of pakistan . no country wants to see americans and no one wants to see that kind of instability in pakistan . that will benefit india as well.

    >> thank you. coming up next, the latino vote in 2012 . why both parties have their work cut out for them. a record breaking turn out for the new york city marathon over the weekend. perhaps the biggest star of the race was chilean miner edison pena that despite a bad knee crossed the finish line in just under six hours. meredith vieira and al roker who made the run. a


Discussion comments


Most active discussions

  1. votes comments
  2. votes comments
  3. votes comments
  4. votes comments