Image: Full-body scan
Charles Rex Arbogast  /  AP
An airline passenger undergoes a full-body scan Wednesday at O'Hare International Airport in Chicago.
By
updated 11/18/2010 4:15:12 PM ET 2010-11-18T21:15:12

They look a little like giant refrigerators and pack a radiation dose big enough to peer through clothing for bombs or weapons, yet too minuscule to be harmful, federal officials insist.

As the government rolls out hundreds more full-body scanners at airports just in time for crowds of holiday travelers, it is working to reassure the public that the machines are safe.

  1. Don't miss these Travel stories
    1. Lords of the gourd compete for Punkin Chunkin honors

      With teams using more than 100 unique apparatuses to launch globular projectiles a half-mile or more, the 27th annual World Championship Punkin Chunkin event is our pick as November’s Weird Festival of the Month.

    2. Airports, airlines work hard to return your lost items
    3. Expert: Tourist hordes threaten Sistine Chapel's art
    4. MGM Grand wants Las Vegas guests to Stay Well
    5. Report: Airlines collecting $36.1B in fees this year

An independent group of experts agrees, as long as radiation doses are kept within the low limits set for the scanners. Still, a few scientists worry that machines might malfunction, raising the risk of cancer.

The Transportation Security Administration says radiation from one scan is about the same as a person would get from flying for about three minutes in an airplane at 30,000 feet, where atmospheric radiation levels are higher than on the ground. That amount is vastly lower than a single dental X-ray.

You would have to go through scanners more than 1,000 times in one year to even meet the maximum recommended level — and even pilots don't do that.

Related: Are airport X-ray scanners harmful?

"We are confident that full-body X-ray security products and practices do not pose a significant risk to the public health," officials from the Food and Drug Administration and the TSA wrote in a letter last month to White House science adviser John Holdren.

Concerns over radiation
Yet ripples of concern have surfaced among some passengers fearful about excess radiation, among some flight crews already overexposed to radiation in the air and even among a few scientists.

Video: TSA battles image problem over body scanner (on this page)

"The thing that worries me the most is what happens if the thing fails in some way" and emits too much radiation, said Arizona State University physics professor Peter Rez.

The risk for failure is higher than in a medical setting because the machines are operated much more often, and by TSA workers without medical training, Rez said.

  1. Don't miss these Travel stories
    1. Lords of the gourd compete for Punkin Chunkin honors

      With teams using more than 100 unique apparatuses to launch globular projectiles a half-mile or more, the 27th annual World Championship Punkin Chunkin event is our pick as November’s Weird Festival of the Month.

    2. Airports, airlines work hard to return your lost items
    3. Expert: Tourist hordes threaten Sistine Chapel's art
    4. MGM Grand wants Las Vegas guests to Stay Well
    5. Report: Airlines collecting $36.1B in fees this year

American Airlines pilot Sam Mayer said pilots he knows are opting out of being scanned.

"All they're telling the public is that it's fine. We're looking for some science" to back that up, Mayer said. The FDA says the science does establish the machines' safety.

Airline pilots and other flight crew members face a slightly increased lifetime risk of developing cancer, about 1 percent higher than the general population, according to the Health Physics Society, a nonprofit group of scientists and other professionals involved in radiation safety.

"Radiation has always been a concern of pilots because of what we do," Mayer said. "This is just one more exposure on top of what we're getting."

Interactive: Full-body scanners (on this page)

Mayer stressed that pilots are equally upset with the TSA's option for people who don't want full-body scans — body pat-downs that critics say are akin to groping.

"We want the TSA to stop the bad guys, and that's not us," Mayer said.

'Insignificant' radiation levels
About 385 scanners, each costing up to $170,000, are already in place at more than 60 airports. The TSA is adding more and expects to have 500 total in place by year's end.

Data: Where are the scanners? (on this page)

About half are what are known as millimeter-wave units, made by L-3 Communications, which are not the focus of safety concerns because they emit a less potent kind of radiation. The remaining machines are Rapiscan System's "backscatter" scanners, which emit X-ray-like ionizing radiation. This kind of radiation in larger doses can cause cell changes leading to cancer.

"From a strictly radiation-safety standpoint, there would be no concern" with either type of scanner, said Richard Morin, a radiology specialist at the Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, Fla. "For both of them, levels for radiation are pretty much insignificant."

The Health Physics Society says the screening is justified if radiation doses do not exceed standard limits, and if the public is informed of the radiation exposure.

The National Council on Radiation Protection & Measurements, an independent group that advises the government on radiation issues, examined backscatter screening at the request of the Food and Drug Administration. It said non-ionizing scanners should be considered first, if possible. But it also recommended limits for backscatter radiation and said health risks would be minimal if doses were below those limits. The government insists that they are.

David Schauer, the council's executive director, says he has no qualms about being scanned by backscatter devices, and would allow his three sons to be scanned, too.

Slideshow: Airport Body Searches (on this page)

TSA spokesman Nick Kimball said Thursday that both types of scanners are safe, cost about the same and are similarly effective. He said the TSA chose to use both types to keep the process competitive and to "drive innovation."

He noted that unlike medical workers who deal with more potent radiation, TSA employees do not need to wear protective gear while operating the scanners.

Scanners are tested for safety before being set up at airports and tested again periodically once they are in place, said Daniel Kassiday, an FDA radiation expert.

FDA: risks minimal
The FDA has estimated that the risk of fatal cancer from the maximum allowable dose would be 1 in 80 million per backscatter screening. And doses from a single scan are considerably lower than the maximum, Kassiday said.

By comparison, the chance of dying in a car driven for 40 miles are 1 in 1 million.

Rez agrees the odds of getting cancer from the scanners may be low. But he calculates it's about the same as the chance of being on a plane blown up by terrorists. And he says that makes mass scanning not worth the effort.

The government says independent testing proved the airport scanners are safe. Johns Hopkins University's Applied Physics Laboratory did independent tests — but only to determine how much radiation the devices emit, not to examine safety, said Helen Worth, a lab spokeswoman.

  1. Most popular

The amount of radiation the devices emit in a lab setting versus real-world use may be different, and a group of scientists from the University of California at San Francisco argues that tougher safety testing is needed.

The four scientists expressed their concerns in an April 6 letter to Holdren, the White House adviser. It took him six months to respond.

Though the scanner images do not reveal what's beneath the skin's surface, the radiation they emit could potentially affect breast tissue, sex organs and eyes, said David Agard, an imaging expert at the University of California at San Francisco.

The response "is just a regurgitation of what the industry people have been saying," said John Sedat, a UCSF professor emeritus in biochemistry and biophysics.

He faulted the government for not doing safety testing in animals to see if the scanners caused any worrisome biochemical changes. Kassiday said the university scientists have not justified why that kind of testing on such low-dose devices would be necessary.

Copyright 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Video: TSA battles image problem over body scanner

  1. Transcript of: TSA battles image problem over body scanner

    BRIAN WILLIAMS, anchor: The TSA is taking more heat tonight over this enhanced airline screening, the choice that fliers now face at over 60 American airports of the full-body scan or the full-body pat-down. Some airline passenger groups are urging travelers to take part in a kind of act of civil disobedience and opt out of both, the scans and the pat-downs, during next week's Thanksgiving rush. But the head of the TSA said tonight people won't be allowed to duck the scans or pat-downs, even if they try to do so on religious grounds. Our own Tom Costello , who covers aviation for us, is in our Washington newsroom tonight. Tom , good evening.

    TOM COSTELLO reporting: Hi, Brian. That was the question put to the TSA chief on Capitol Hill today. And the message from him was no passenger can be allowed to circumvent the full-body scanners or the pat-downs even on religious grounds. If anyone who refuses to fly -- pardon me, if anyone refuses, they simply won't be allowed to fly. It may be a matter of bad timing. The TSA 's new very personal pat-downs have started just as it rolls out its 385th full-body scanner in the nation's airports, catching airline crews and passengers off guard. In Kansas City , Trish Wimmer thought her pat-down got way too personal.

    Ms. TRISH WIMMER: When she went up my legs and used her hand to go up my skirt, that's when I freaked out.

    COSTELLO: Amid growing passenger concern, the man who runs the TSA today told Congress finding the delicate balance between security and privacy is a constant challenge.

    Mr. JOHN PISTOLE (Transportation Security Administration Administrator): I think everybody who gets on a flight wants to ensure and be assured that everybody else around them has been properly screened.

    COSTELLO: Now an Internet led call for passengers to resist the new TSA procedures over the Thanksgiving holiday has the TSA and airlines on alert. The concern, if a significant number of passengers elect to boycott the scanners and the pat-downs, security delays could grow and travelers could miss their flights. AAA today predicted 1.6 million passengers will fly over Thanksgiving week, 400,000 more than last year.

    Mr. ROBERT DARBELNET (AAA President and CEO): I think we would all be concerned because the potential to make those lines even longer and that day even more difficult for people is real.

    COSTELLO: While the TSA chief now suggests pilots could soon be exempt from going through full-body scanners, pilots insist their passengers should be scanned or patted down.

    Mr. JAMES RAY (United States Airline Pilots Association Spokesman): As a pilot I can tell you, I definitely want my passengers to go through some sort of screening.

    COSTELLO: A recent poll found 81 percent of Americans support the use of full-body scanners. But, Brian , that doesn't mean that they like them.

    WILLIAMS: Tom Costello in Washington tonight. Tom , thanks.

Data: Where are the scanners?

Photos: Holiday Travel

loading photos...
  1. (Joe Heller / The Green Bay Press-Gazette, Politicalcartoons.com) Back to slideshow navigation
  2. (Jimmy Margulies / The New Jersey Record, Politicalcartoons.com) Back to slideshow navigation
  3. (Nate Beeler / The Washington Examiner, Politicalcartoons.com) Back to slideshow navigation
  4. (Adam Zyglis / The Buffalo News, Politicalcartoons.com) Back to slideshow navigation
  5. (Joe Heller / The Green Bay Press-Gazette, Politicalcartoons.com) Back to slideshow navigation
  6. (Andy Singer / No Exit, Politicalcartoons.com) Back to slideshow navigation
  1. Editor's note:
    This image contains graphic content that some viewers may find disturbing.

    Click to view the image, or use the buttons above to navigate away.

  2. Editor's note:
    This image contains graphic content that some viewers may find disturbing.

    Click to view the image, or use the buttons above to navigate away.

  3. Editor's note:
    This image contains graphic content that some viewers may find disturbing.

    Click to view the image, or use the buttons above to navigate away.

  4. Editor's note:
    This image contains graphic content that some viewers may find disturbing.

    Click to view the image, or use the buttons above to navigate away.

  1. Joe Heller / The Green Bay Press-Gazette, Politicalcartoons.com
    Above: Slideshow (6) Holiday Travel
  2. Terry "Aislin" Mosher / The Montreal Gazette, Canada, Politicalcartoons.com
    Slideshow (6) Airport Body Searches

Discuss:

Discussion comments

,

Most active discussions

  1. votes comments
  2. votes comments
  3. votes comments
  4. votes comments