By
updated 2/24/2011 3:52:13 PM ET 2011-02-24T20:52:13

Senate Democrats are reviewing possible spending cuts in drafting a seven-month bill to keep the government in operation after existing funding expires on March 4, officials said Thursday, the first time they have demonstrated a willingness to embrace immediate reductions.

  1. Other political news of note
    1. Obama challenges Naval Academy graduates to help restore trust in institutions

      Updated 78 minutes ago 5/24/2013 3:50:46 PM +00:00 In a speech to the graduating class of 2013 at the U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis, Md., President Barack Obama challenged the 1,047 graduates to “live with integrity” and help restore trust in a military that has been stained by recent charges of sexual assault.

    2. Obama reframes rules of engagement on terrorism
    3. IRS official Lerner placed on leave
    4. Heckler repeatedly interrupts Obama speech
    5. Immigration advocates steel for Senate slog

These Democratic officials said about $8.5 billion remaining from previously approved congressional earmarks may be reduced or eliminated, and Democratic aides also are reviewing President Barack Obama's proposed program cuts and terminations for 2012 to see whether any should take effect immediately.

Story: House Republicans plot 2-week spending bill

The officials spoke on condition of anonymity, saying they are not authorized to discuss private deliberations.

The disclosure comes as the two parties maneuver for political position in advance of the March 4 deadline for legislation to keep the government in operation.

The House passed legislation last week to extend funding authority through the Sept. 30 end of the fiscal year, including $61 billion in spending cuts and a blockade on selected federal regulations pending on private industries.

Video: Can the GOP and Democrats agree on the budget? (on this page)

Democrats responded quickly, accusing Tea Party-backed lawmakers and other Republicans of seeking a government shutdown, and proposing instead to keep programs operating at current levels. GOP leaders countered that the only advocates for a shutdown are among the Democratic leadership in Congress.

The White House has threatened to veto the House measure, but has avoided accusations that Republicans want to shut the government down, emphasizing instead that the president wants to work with lawmakers in both parties in Congress to reduce federal deficits.

Proposals for interim bill
More recently, leaders of the two parties in Congress swapped competing proposals for an interim bill while negotiations continue on a compromise that would last through the end of the fiscal year.

Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., announced plans to advance a one-month bill at current spending levels, while House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, countered with a two-week bill that included $4 billion in cuts.

A spokesman for Boehner, Michael Steel, said the latest move by Democrats showed they were "making progress toward our goal of cutting government spending to help the private sector create jobs." He called on them to follow up by agreeing to support a short-term bill with spending cuts "rather than shutting down the government."

Obama's 2012 budget includes $24.7 billion in program reductions and terminations, and it was not immediately clear which of them might be included in the legislation Senate Democratic leaders send to the floor.

One candidate is an alternative engine for the Pentagon's next-generation fighter aircraft, a program that the White House and Secretary of defense Robert Gates oppose, and that the House voted to jettison at a savings of about $450 million. Obama also has proposed a $2.5 billion reduction in energy assistance for the low-income, arguing that a recent spike in prices has dissipated. The proposal drew sharp criticism from some Democrats at the time it was disclosed.

Obama has also proposed a $1 billion reduction in a grant program for local airports and cuts in U.S. Army Corps of Engineers projects, as well as dozens of smaller reductions.

The development that Senate Democrats are considering immediate cuts — but only as part of a bill lasting until Sept. 30 — underscores that members of their own rank and file want to demonstrate a commitment to cutting federal deficits that goes beyond the five-year freeze in domestic spending that Obama included in his 2012 budget. Democrats have a majority in the Senate, 53-47, including independents who side with them, but several of the party's lawmakers are on the ballot in 2012 in swing states.

Federal deficits are estimated to reach a record $1.5 trillion, and Republicans won control of the House and gained Senate seats last fall on a promise of reducing spending and reining in the reach of the government.

Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Video: Can the GOP and Democrats agree on the budget?

  1. Closed captioning of: Can the GOP and Democrats agree on the budget?

    >> political analyst charlie cook is also a journalist and editor of the cook political report . charlie, where are we going on this? is this a giant game of chicken? and does it end up leading to a short shutdown without social security , you know, some of the more symbolic gestures? or is this really serious business?

    >> well, it's all serious, but i think this is more of a preliminary round. the big one's going to be raising the debt ceiling. but we're not going to have a government shutdown . if there is one, maybe two hours. it's not the one that any citizen would even notice. i don't think we're even going to have one. but the government has contingency plans. it's not like the air traffic controllers would leave the building and there would be a cease-fire in afghanistan. most americans wouldn't ever even know it if there was two or a six or a one-day shutdown, but i doubt we get there. the big fight is going to be the debt ceiling. that's going to be the one that really, really, really matters and where it's going to be, i think the political equivalent of brain surgery, trying to negotiate cuts that are enough for republicans to take home to support a debt increase, but not so much that democrats just can't go along with it at all.

    >> and in talking to some republicans, i think the difference this time is that john boehner doesn't really control his own caucus. whatever you think of the job that he's trying to do, these preliminary run-up votes show that you've got new members in the republican caucus who aren't the same as the old-style members of congress. they don't seem to care if they aren't re-elected. and that doesn't give the speaker a whole lot of leverage to try to whip them into shape.

    >> i think it's true that speaker boehner does not control all members of his caucus, or particularly the freshman, but at the same time, he's trying to govern in a different way. when you're doing open rules and exposing yourself and not just sort of running --

    >> which means he's permitting amendments on the floor, this is not the sort of top-down control that nancy pelosi and her republican predecessors --

    >> yeah, this is --

    >> this is not tom delay .

    >> exactly. this is the way the institution is supposed to work. and democracy is messy. and it's going to expose boehner to some losses here or there. the thing is, whether you're talking about speaker boehner or harry reid or the president or all these people, you know, these are all adults. and they all know the consequences of a real government shutdown , and of not raising the debt ceiling. and i think at the end of the day , it will be something that nobody's happy, but everybody can live with.

    >> the " national journal " had a poll, you have a poll here which shows how the public reacts, would react to a government shutdown and shows an absolute, you know, flip here where democrats think that the shutdown is in their party interest. 56% and 56% of republicans think it's not.

    >> well of the insiders, yeah. nobody knows how this thing's going to go. the thing is, who does a better job of framing it? and voters aren't sure -- i mean, you'll have 80, 85% of democratic voters thinking one thing and 80, 85% of republican voters saying -- and independents, they're sort of watching and they're not sure. so this hasn't played out yet.

    >> the bottom line is that we know there's plenty of talk going on behind the scenes , house and senate. you've got most likely people from the white house , from the treasury, the treasury secretary himself up there talking to people. they're going to try to work something out, because as you say, the grown-ups know that with the global markets and everything else that's going on and oil prices zooming, the cost of what's happening in libya and the rest of the middle east , this recovery is fragile.

    >> yeah. the adults know the consequences. ? going to -- and they'

    >> but are they in charge?

    >> well, i think they'll eventually prevail. but this is going to be messy. it's going to be a roller coaster. it's not going to be fun to watch or pleasant to watch. but you know, at the end of the day , it's going to work out.

    >> okay, charlie cook , take it from there. and of course, you're on videotape now saying

Discuss:

Discussion comments

,

Most active discussions

  1. votes comments
  2. votes comments
  3. votes comments
  4. votes comments
  1. Jump to text

    Senate Democrats are reviewing possible spending...

  2. Jump to video

    Can the GOP and Democrats agree on ...

  3. Jump to discussion

    Sources: Senate Dems consider spending cuts