LANSING, Mich. — Chanting "Take Michigan Back," thousands of protesters rallied at the state Capitol on Wednesday against Gov. Rick Snyder's controversial proposals to cut the budget.
Union members and their supporters say the Republican governor's bills will cut away at collective bargaining rights, preveailing wage laws and other measures important to unions.
"It's beautiful," one retired automotive worker told the Lansing State Journal on Wednesday about the rally. "It sends a message that it's not fair. They are trying to pinch unions."Video: Booker: You don’t throw out collective bargaining (on this page)
Other political news of note
Poll: Support for stricter gun control drops
Support for stricter gun-control measures has dropped to its lowest level since last year’s tragic shootings in Newtown, Conn., according to the latest NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll.
- House passes National Defense Authorization Act
- Obama health care promise named 'Lie of the Year'
- Pelosi to Dems on budget deal: 'Embrace the suck'
- All night long: Rancorous Senate's 24-hour schedule continues
- Poll: Support for stricter gun control drops
The paper estimated that around 3,000 showed up for the rally. On Tuesday, more than 1,000 turned out to protest a tax on retirement income, holding up signs reading "Don't tax the poor and elderly to bribe the rich" and "Corporate greed is the problem, not Grandma!" Some chanted "Recall Rick!"
Lawmakers broaden emergency managers' powers
Snyder is expected to sign a legislative package soon that will give emergency financial managers appointed by the state of Michigan to run struggling cities and schools broad new powers. The GOP-led Michigan House approved the legislation on Tuesday by a vote of 62-48.
The contentious proposal put forward in Michigan, which drew hundreds of protesters to the state Capitol last week and highlighted a rally from a few dozen people inside the building late Tuesday, is the latest in a series of showdowns across the country pitting Republican state officials against union rights backers.
The most visible one came in Wisconsin, where Senate Democrats fled the state to block — albeit temporarily — a vote on legislation stripping collective bargaining rights for public workers.
While the Michigan plan wouldn't go that far, many Democrats and labor unions argue it's a state power grab that could set up virtual dictatorships and strip power from local elected officials in cases when an emergency manager is appointed. They're also upset that an emergency manager could toss out union contracts to salvage a local entity's finances, which opponents consider an assault on collective bargaining.
'This is about democracy'
"This isn't just about collective bargaining," said Lance Enderle, a Democrat who lost a bid to get elected to Congress last year and a leader of Tuesday's state Capitol protest. "This is about democracy."
The current state law related to emergency financial managers is affecting about a half-dozen local communities and schools at this time. Only Pontiac, Benton Harbor, Ecorse and the Detroit Public Schools have state-appointed emergency financial managers in place.
Critics of the new legislation say it could lead to far more cities and schools under control of more powerful emergency managers.
The plan sets up more triggers that would allow the state to review a local school district or government's finances. Supporters say the state could start reviewing the finances of troubled cities and schools earlier with the hopes of avoiding the appointment of an emergency manager.
"These measures will create a more focused, preventative approach to fiscal responsibility throughout the state," Rep. Al Pscholka, R-Stevensville, said in a statement. "For years we have allowed cities and schools to be on the verge of bankruptcy without any intervention. In many cases we discover that financial records are not in order and it leaves emergency managers with very few options to balance the books."
The law sets up multiple triggers that could spark a state review of a local government or school's finances. The triggers would include creditors with undisputed claims, defaulting on bonds, ending the year in a deficit or a resolution of the state House or Senate requesting a preliminary review, among other triggers.
The state treasurer's office says the bill would allow the state to get information from local governments and start preliminary reviews more quickly.
Supporters of the plan say many cases could be resolved without the appointment of an emergency manager. Ultimately, the governor would decide whether an emergency manager is appointed. The manager then could modify or end union contracts, order elections to raise or extend property taxes or take a host of other actions. A manager could recommend that local governments consolidate and with the governor's approval could "disincorporate or dissolve" a municipal government.
Some provisions in early versions of the legislation were dropped in the hopes of gaining broader support. Emergency managers would have to be individuals, not firms or corporations. The original version would have banned local elected officials in emergency manager situations from running for office again for up to 10 years, but that provision also was dropped.
Local elected officials would be stripped of significant powers, but supporters of the legislation say they could be removed from office only if they repeatedly refuse to comply with requests for information.
Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.