Video: Paralyzed mom may lose right to see children

  1. Closed captioning of: Paralyzed mom may lose right to see children

    >>> time now for today's "news nation" gut check. just a few short hours from now, a california judge is set to rule on whether a paralyzed woman who cannot eat, speak or move, is entitled to regular visitation rights with her three young children. paralyzed after a medical mistake while giving birth to triplets in 2006 . her ex-husband, who left her after he according to reports, determined that she was not going to be able to make a full recovery, thinks the children would be traumatized by spending too much time with their mother. he is now raising the children on his own. abbey's parents have hired attorneys to fight for visits. her parent says just because she's paralyzed does not mean that she does not love her children and they say she has a constitutional right to see her children who now live in a separate state because abbey's parents are her primary caretakers. superior court judge shaler is expected to rule today after hearing closing arguenments from both sides. the attorneys were supposed to join "news nation" but they were called at the last minute into a closed-door meeting, perhaps, regarding a development in the case. we tried to reach out to the ex-husband of abbey, his attorneys, but they never called us back. according, though to her parents, abbey is able to communicate by blinking her eyes. when asked if she wanted to see her children, they believe she indicated such in responding with the blink of the eye. injuries, the paralyzing situation for the mother, occurred while giving birth to these triplets. her uterus was ruptured by a doctor and as a result $8 million malpractice settlement. her parents oversee it. for his part, her ex-husband insists that the children will be traumatized. they did see their mother in december for four days and all parties agreed it was a pleasant visit and it went well. the question at this point, what does your gut tell you.

    >> should the judge rule in favor of allowing children to spend time with their mother, even if she does not have the ability to communicate and she's paralyzed. a heck of a question. an unprecedented case. for the family, they say it is about parental rights and a koon constitutional right for the individual. cast your vote. we hope to have attorneys on tomorrow. that

updated 3/24/2011 3:36:47 PM ET 2011-03-24T19:36:47

Even though Abbie Dorn was paralyzed giving birth to triplets, her parents say that doesn't mean she should be denied the right to hold her children and watch as they grow up — even though she can't eat, speak or move.

  1. Don't miss these Health stories
    1. Splash News
      More women opting for preventive mastectomy - but should they be?

      Rates of women who are opting for preventive mastectomies, such as Angeline Jolie, have increased by an estimated 50 percent in recent years, experts say. But many doctors are puzzled because the operation doesn't carry a 100 percent guarantee, it's major surgery -- and women have other options, from a once-a-day pill to careful monitoring.

    2. Larry Page's damaged vocal cords: Treatment comes with trade-offs
    3. Report questioning salt guidelines riles heart experts
    4. CDC: 2012 was deadliest year for West Nile in US
    5. What stresses moms most? Themselves, survey says

The parents have gone to court in an effort to persuade a judge that their daughter not only wants motherhood, but has a constitutional right to it as well. Her condition doesn't mean she loves her children any less than any other mother would love hers, they say.

But allowing three preschoolers to spend lengthy periods of time with a woman who can only lay motionless will traumatize them, argues their father, Dan Dorn. He has been raising the two boys and a girl as a single parent since the day he brought them home from the hospital nearly five years ago. He wants things to remain that way.

After hearing closing arguments from both sides Thursday, Superior Court Judge Frederick C. Shaller is expected to decide whether Dan Dorn must agree to grant his ex-wife regular visitation rights.

Ultimately, Shaller's ruling will likely only resolve the matter temporarily. A parental rights lawsuit brought by Abbie Dorn's parents, Paul and Susan Cohen of South Carolina, is expected to take place later.

The tragic events that led all parties to Shaller's courtroom this week began on what should have been the happiest day of Abbie Dorn's life. That was June 20, 2006, when she left for the hospital to give birth to her sons Reuvi and Yossi and their sister Esti.

The first two births took place without incident, but as a doctor was delivering Yossi he accidentally nicked Dorn's uterus. Before doctors could stop the bleeding, her heart had stopped, a defibrillator they used malfunctioned and her brain was deprived of oxygen.

A year later her husband, believing she would never recover, divorced her and is raising their children at his Los Angeles home. Her parents, meanwhile, took her to their Myrtle Beach, S.C., home where they are caring for her. As the conservators of her estate, they also manage her malpractice settlement of nearly $8 million.

Story: School parents want girl with peanut allergy sent home

They want her ex-husband to bring the children there for regular visits.

Until a four-day visit last December, Dan Dorn had not done so. His ex-wife's parents say that was the first chance she had to hold her children since the day they were born.

Both sides agreed in court last week that the visit went well and the children would like to see their mother again.

But their father wants to limit their interaction to avoid traumatizing them. He noted that his ex-wife can't speak and he believes she isn't aware of her surroundings.

Abbie Dorn's mother disagrees. She says her daughter expresses her emotions when she smiles or cries and that she communicates with others by blinking her eyes. One long blink means yes. No response to a question means no.

When a Los Angeles Times reporter visited her last year and asked if she wanted to see her children, Dorn responded with a long, firm blink.

The Times reported that neurologist Dr. Angela Hays, who examined Abbie Dorn, testified that she can perceive sounds and images. "She does perform an eye blink maneuver to attempt to signal yes or no answers," Hays said, although "it was difficult for me to get her to do that reliably."

Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Vote: Should paralyzed mom be allowed to see her children?