By
updated 4/18/2011 11:14:35 AM ET 2011-04-18T15:14:35

House Republicans resurrected a 1990s-era fight over food stamps in their budget approved last week, arguing that any serious attempt to cut spending must include an overhaul of government programs that help needy families pay for food.

  1. Other political news of note
    1. Animated Boehner: 'There's nothing complex about the Keystone Pipeline!'

      House Speaker John Boehner became animated Tuesday over the proposed Keystone Pipeline, castigating the Obama administration for not having approved the project yet.

    2. Budget deficits shrinking but set to grow after 2015
    3. Senate readies another volley on unemployment aid
    4. Obama faces Syria standstill
    5. Fluke files to run in California

Congress already has started cutting some food programs, including reducing the Women, Infants and Children Program by $500 million as part of a deal on this year's budget. And last year, more than $2 billion in future funding for food stamps was redirected to other programs.

On Friday, the House approved a Republican proposal to overhaul the $65 billion food stamp program — known officially as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP — by replacing it with capped block grants to states, which would pay for the aid but make it contingent on work or job training. That proposal was included in a 2012 budget plan put forward by Budget Committee Chairman Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis.

His plan lays out a fiscal vision for cutting $6.2 trillion from yearly federal deficits over the coming decade and has drawn widespread attention for its call for transforming Medicare into a voucher-like system that subsidizes purchases of private health insurance. It is likely to meet strong opposition is the Senate, where Democrats still have a majority.

Story: House passes $6 trillion spending cut plan for 2012

Parallels to 1996
The food stamp component is similar to changes Republicans proposed as part of the welfare overhaul signed by President Bill Clinton in 1996, and Ryan echoed arguments from 15 years ago in his proposal, saying "America's safety net does not become a hammock that lulls able-bodied citizens into lives of complacency and dependency."

But back then, farm-state Republicans like Kansas Sen. Pat Roberts, who was then chairman of the House Agriculture Committee, blocked the reform effort.

Story: 'Gang of six' in Senate seeking a plan on debt

Congress authorizes spending on hunger and agriculture programs in a massive farm bill every five years, and farm-state members have typically supported food programs in exchange for urban support for agriculture.

The next farm bill is due to be written next year, and it's unclear whether Republicans will take a different approach this time around because of pressure from constituents clamoring for budget cuts. A spokeswoman for Roberts, now the top Republican on the Senate Agriculture Committee, said Friday that he hasn't decided whether he would support an overhaul of the food stamp program.

Although many Republicans have enthusiastically supported Ryan's budget on the House floor, few have mentioned food stamp issue in their speeches.

They may be hearing from constituents like 66-year-old Connie Downey of Omaha, Neb., a former real estate agent who saw her savings erode when she was diagnosed with lung disease. Downey is on the cusp of qualifying for food stamps, though her $3,000 in savings still puts her above Nebraska's $2,000 asset limit for eligibility.

If her savings drop and she qualifies for federal food aid, Downey said she'd buy the nutritional drinks recommended by a visiting nurse as well as fruits and vegetables. Right now, she's relying on a daily $2 delivery from Meals on Wheels.

Story: Deficit/debt dilemma is way uglier than in the 90s

"I had saved this money, because I thought if I got sick, I'd have it to back me up," Downey said. "I didn't know it would keep me from being able to eat."

The Agriculture Department says the food stamp program is designed to expand and contract with the economy. The average stay on the program is nine months, and half of the recipients are children.

Anti-hunger advocates criticize plan
Anti-hunger advocates said they worry that funding cuts by Congress coupled with rising food costs could devastate families struggling in the sluggish economy. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said last week that his department, which oversees SNAP and other food programs, is increasingly concerned that Congress is depleting the reserves.

Story: Geithner says he's confident debt limit will be raised

Rep. Jim McGovern, D-Mass., who has long sought more money for anti-hunger programs, said the suggested overhaul would dismantle the food stamp program by limiting money for it.

"Budgets are moral documents. They reflect our values," he said. "There is a very real risk that we could lose some of these programs that provide a circle of protection to people who are poor."

Conservatives said that may be necessary.

Ryan has argued states are encouraged to add people to the rolls because greater participation means increased funding. The program serves roughly 44 million people today, more than double the number a decade ago, he noted.

Robert Rector, a senior research fellow at the conservative Heritage Foundation, has been working on welfare issues since Ronald Reagan was president. He said Ryan's proposal could be seen as conservatives' opening shot in a debate about overall assistance to the poor.

"You don't just want to do it with a meat cleaver, and the Ryan approach with work incentives is a good approach," Rector said.

Opponents of the Ryan plan say food stamps not only help low-income people, they benefit farmers and the retailers who sell food.

"These are people in grocery stores, they are farmers, they are all the people around the supply chain who support this program," said Vicki Escarra, president of the anti-hunger group Feeding America. "I think people are really concerned about the budget and the deficit, and I understand that ... but there are lots of ways we can do this without the vast majority of cuts being focused on programs that really need help right now."

Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Video: GOP draws battle lines with budget passage

  1. Closed captioning of: GOP draws battle lines with budget passage

    >>> to politics now. in washington president obama 's re- election campaign got under way last night with three separate fund-raisers in his hometown of chicago. during one of those events, a microphone he assumed was off was instead left on, and it revealed some combative remarks about the budget fight. white house correspondent savannah guthrie on the job on this friday night has that story. savannah, good evening.

    >> reporter: good evening, brian. the president's spokesman says the president is not embarrassed. there's nothing on those recordings he couldn't say publicly. but for a president that so carefully measures his word, it provided for some revealing moments. the candidate president back from a triple-header of campaign fund-raisers last night in chicago.

    >> that's what this campaign is about.

    >> reporter: taking questioning at a private fund-raiser, the president was caught on a microphone he did not know was recording, talking about last week's budget negotiations with republicans.

    >> i said, you want to repeal health care ? go at it. we'll have that debate. you're not going to be able to do that by nickel and diming me in the budget. you think we're stupid?

    >> reporter: the president also aimed fire at republican congressman paul ryan , whose 2012 budget proposal the president ripped on wednesday.

    >> this is the same guy who voted for two wars that were unpaid for, voted for the bush tax cuts that were unpaid for.

    >> reporter: on capitol hill , house republicans passed ryan's budget plan. it cut $6 trillion from the deficit over the next decade in part by raising the eligibility age of future medicare recipients. the lubudget likely won't pass the senate but republicans are taking a stand.

    >> we have a president who is unwilling to lead. we have too many politicians worried about the next election and not worried about the next generation.

    >> reporter: republicans are also drawing battle lines over a vote to raise how much the u.s. can borrow.

    >> there will be no debt limit increase unless it's accompanied by serious spending cuts and real budget reforms.

    >> reporter: in an interview with the a.p., the president wander failure to raise the limit will devastate the economy.

    >> he's absolutely right that it's not going to happen without some spending cuts. i'm confident we're going to raise the debt limit. we always have. we will do it again.

    >> reporter: well, the white house says the president still would prefer congress to raise the debt limit without putting conditions on that vote. the fear is that even the threat of a default on u.s. obligations would have severe consequences for the economy, brian.

    >> savannah guthrie at the white house for us tonight. savannah, thanks. later on we'll have something else the president said that he didn't know was being recorded.

Discuss:

Discussion comments

,

Most active discussions

  1. votes comments
  2. votes comments
  3. votes comments
  4. votes comments