updated 9/15/2004 3:58:10 PM ET 2004-09-15T19:58:10

A drug for advanced breast cancer prevents localized tumors from returning after surgery better than the current mainstay drug, according to a large, international study that promises new hope and treatment strategies for many patients.

  1. Don't miss these Health stories
    1. Splash News
      More women opting for preventive mastectomy - but should they be?

      Rates of women who are opting for preventive mastectomies, such as Angeline Jolie, have increased by an estimated 50 percent in recent years, experts say. But many doctors are puzzled because the operation doesn't carry a 100 percent guarantee, it's major surgery -- and women have other options, from a once-a-day pill to careful monitoring.

    2. Larry Page's damaged vocal cords: Treatment comes with trade-offs
    3. Report questioning salt guidelines riles heart experts
    4. CDC: 2012 was deadliest year for West Nile in US
    5. What stresses moms most? Themselves, survey says

Recurrence of such early cancer was reduced by one-third in women who started on the gold standard treatment, tamoxifen, then switched after 2½ years to the newer drug, exemestane, compared to those who took tamoxifen the whole time.

The women switching to exemestane, a hormonal drug sold under the brand Aromasin, also had less serious side effects, were 56 percent less likely to get cancer in the other breast and were half as likely to develop unrelated cancer in other body areas.

Dr. Jeff Abrams, the National Cancer Institute’s associate chief of clinical research, said a recent study on exemestane “cousin” letrozole showed important advantages over tamoxifen for their class of drugs, called aromatase inhibitors. Abrams was not involved in the new study.

Lead researcher Dr. R.C. Coombes, professor of cancer medicine at Imperial College School of Medicine in London, predicted doctors will give exemestane to many women at high risk for recurrence, such as those whose breast cancer spreads to multiple lymph nodes.

“More work needs to be done to understand what’s going on” at the molecular level, he said.

The study, which included 4,742 postmenopausal women in 37 countries, focused on women with breast cancer in which the hormone estrogen fuels tumor growth — the type causing about 70 percent of breast cancer. The results do not apply to premenopausal women or those with tough-to-treat breast cancer not driven by estrogen.

Resistance to Tamoxifen
Normally, early-stage breast cancer is treated by surgery to remove the tumor, plus radiation, if part of the breast is conserved. If tumor cells had spread to underarm lymph nodes, cell-killing cancer drugs often are given, particularly in the United States.

Then, if the cancer is undetectable and it’s the type fueled by estrogen, women take daily tamoxifen pills for five years — to prevent any microscopic cancer cells lurking in the body from later triggering cancer in another spot. Such metastasized cancer is virtually incurable.

But cancer cells grow resistant to tamoxifen in many patients, sometimes within 12 months, and prolonged use can cause uterine cancer and dangerous blood clots.

Those problems sparked interest in hormonal drugs such as aromatase inhibitors, which dramatically suppress estrogen production by adrenal glands and other tissues by blocking the effects of the enzyme aromatase. Tamoxifen binds to specific tumor cell sites to keep estrogen from attaching and directing the cells to multiply.

Aromatase inhibitors have been around since the 1970s, but high toxicity limited use. Today’s “third generation” aromatase inhibitors — including Aromasin, Femara and Arimidex — work better and are less toxic but still increase bone loss, a serious problem for elderly women, Coombes said.

His team reported interim results through last June from the study, which is nearly complete, in Thursday’s edition of the New England Journal of Medicine.

The research was partly funded by Pfizer Inc., the maker of Aromasin.

Among the women switching to exemestane, 54 died of breast cancer, compared with 67 in the tamoxifen-only group. Overall, 91.5 percent of women in the exemestane group were cancer free three years after switching drugs, compared with 86.8 percent for women who stayed on tamoxifen.

“It confirms a trend that we’ve been seeing in treatment with metastatic disease,” said Dr. Julia Smith, clinical associate professor of oncology at the NYU school of medicine and cancer institute. “This whole class of drugs looks very promising, very active.”

© 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Discuss:

Discussion comments

,

Most active discussions

  1. votes comments
  2. votes comments
  3. votes comments
  4. votes comments