Bill Gardner
Jim Cole  /  AP
New Hampshire's Secretary of State Bill Gardner walks by the historic desk where presidential candidates file their paperwork to be on the nations first presidential primary ballot, in Concord, N.H. on Wednesday.
NBC News and news services
updated 10/22/2011 9:17:25 PM ET 2011-10-23T01:17:25

Nevada Republicans have shifted their presidential caucuses to early February, a move that ends an increasingly bitter standoff among rival states and for the first time clarifies the path to the Republican presidential nomination.

There will be no voting before Christmas. That's despite warnings from New Hampshire's top election official that Nevada's initial insistence to host its contest in mid-January could force the Granite State to schedule the nation's first Republican primary election in roughly six weeks.

But facing boycott threats from campaigns, incentive offers from the Republican National Committee, and the private blessing of the Mitt Romney campaign, Nevada Republicans voted Saturday to set their caucuses for Feb. 4. It will be the West's first stop in the race for the Republican presidential nomination and the fifth contest overall, after Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina and Florida.

Story: Iowa Republicans schedule Jan. 3 caucuses
  1. Other political news of note
    1. Animated Boehner: 'There's nothing complex about the Keystone Pipeline!'

      House Speaker John Boehner became animated Tuesday over the proposed Keystone Pipeline, castigating the Obama administration for not having approved the project yet.

    2. Budget deficits shrinking but set to grow after 2015
    3. Senate readies another volley on unemployment aid
    4. Obama faces Syria standstill
    5. Fluke files to run in California

"The candidates are anxious to come here and campaign and don't want to have the heat put on them by New Hampshire to stay away," former Nevada Gov. Bob List, a national Republican committeeman, said before Saturday's vote. "We have to eat a little crow perhaps in some people's minds, but I think in the end it's a win-win."

The calendar scramble had consumed Republican officials in early voting states and complicated candidates' decisions about travel, the timing of television advertisements and the distribution of limited resources. But with New Hampshire now free to settle on its preferred date of Jan. 10, the final puzzle pieces appear to have fallen into place.

Iowa will keep its Jan. 3 caucus date despite Nevada's move, Iowa GOP chairman Matt Strawn said Saturday.

The Republican presidential contenders are free to shift their campaigns into high gear with the first stop on the road to the GOP nomination set for Iowa in just 10 weeks.

"Now you'll see the campaigns ramp up very quickly," said Michael Dennehy, a New Hampshire Republican operative who led Sen. John McCain's political operation four years ago and was a central player in the Granite State's boycott push in recent weeks.

Nevada's shift ensures the state won't suffer penalties expected for states that violated national party rules by skipping ahead to boost their political influence. Nevada Republicans also stand to earn some perks at the party's national convention in Florida next August. As part of negotiations in recent days, the Republican National Committee promised Nevada delegates they could sit on the floor "in the best positions," and would have prime hotel space if they made the change, according to Nevada GOP Chairwoman Amy Tarkanian.

"This will be well worth it," she said. "We will be the good guys in the end because we don't need to be New Hampshire's piñata."

The RNC would not comment on its specific role in the discussions, but Chairman Reince Priebus, who had called for a compromise, praised Nevada's decision.

"This change ensures that Nevada retains its prominent national role as the first contest in the West," Priebus said. "Nevadans should be proud of their Republican leaders. They have restored their state's key role in the nomination process and in the 2012 presidential election."

The Romney campaign also played an active, but private, role in the flap.

Story: Hard-hit Nevada will be key battleground in 2012

Campaign officials initially encouraged Nevada to schedule its caucuses before Florida, hoping that Romney's popularity in Nevada would fuel a victory there and create momentum heading into the critical Florida contest. But sensing a political backlash in New Hampshire, Romney representatives in recent days encouraged key Nevada Republicans to settle on a later date.

In a statement, Romney campaign spokesman Ryan Williams said: "We support Nevada's decision to move the date of their caucus and remain an early nominating state. We praise (Secretary of State Bill Gardner's) steadfast leadership in defending New Hampshire's First In The Nation Primary tradition. Secretary Gardner has the full support of Gov. Romney."

New Hampshire officials were clearly happy.

"It's a win for the process and it's certainly a win for New Hampshire," said Phyllis Woods, a RNC member from the Granite State. "Going forward, we really want to have Nevada as an ally. We really don't want to have enemies as we go into the next primary calendar."

Also Saturday, Nevada Democrats said they would hold their caucuses on Jan. 21.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, who helped obtain the state's third-in-the nation status in 2008, decried the GOP's move.

"I'm deeply disappointed that the Nevada Republican Party has caved to the will of the Republican National Committee and New Hampshire," he said in a statement.

NBC News' Garrett Haake and Jo Kent contributed to this report from The Associated Press.

Video: Early states jockey for calendar position

  1. Closed captioning of: Early states jockey for calendar position

    >>> with iowa setting its caucus for january 3rd , the race to be first is coming down to a contest between new hampshire and nevada . we have the politico briefing. david, this showdown, nearly new hampshire will be back, or do we think nevada will try to squeak in?

    >> if i had to bet, i would bet on new hampshire this debate always seems to pop up every four years. nevada is pushing this faceoff. they are trying to stand their ground, but so is new hampshire . i have to think when the front-running candidate is mitt romney , that new hampshire is going to end up winning out on this faceoff.

    >> at the same time this calendar chaos, really, could shove new hampshire into december. is anyone going to take seriously the new hampshire primary if it is in december?

    >> i think they will. again, just because of mitt romney and his, you know, tenable front-runner status. but it will be interesting to see what he says in the coming days, even if he's asked about it at tonight's debate, because both states are very, very important to him and is he going to have to draw the line and say, look, new hampshire needs to keep its first in the nation status. and what will other candidates say? will there be solidarity to keep new hampshire first? it's hard to see a primary season without new hampshire retaining its first in the nation status. but, you know, this is still yet to be determined.

    >> we're not going to have that, new hampshire does have to be first in the nation. and there's the whole tradition. first, nevada is a caucus, new hampshire is a primary. there's the tradition of the door to door voting. the fact that jon huntsman is staying in new hampshire , even though he has not been able to get traction there yet, he said he is building. the other candidates will be put on the spot tonight in nevada .

    >> it's a little gamble for jon huntsman , he's missing the media attention tonight but is probably hoping to get some respect from those voters that basically he staked his candidacy on and those are the people of new hampshire . we'll see if it works for him.

    >> thank you very much for jump jumping in there, david.

    >>> coming up, hillary clinton 's surprise trip to tripoli with millions of dollars of u.s. aid and a threat to gadhafi. or creates another laptop bag or hires another employee, it's not just good for business. it's good for the entire

Discuss:

Discussion comments

,

Most active discussions

  1. votes comments
  2. votes comments
  3. votes comments
  4. votes comments