Wynne Parry
Just as this dinosaur specimen, a relative of Tyrannosaurus rex, went up for auction on May 20, a question arose as to whether or not it was taken illegally from Mongolia.
updated 9/4/2012 1:08:13 PM ET 2012-09-04T17:08:13

The Mongolian government has no claim on a fossilized tyrannosaur skeleton at the center of an international ownership dispute, say attorneys for the Florida fossil dealer who wants the specimen back.

Fossil dealer Eric Prokopi's attorneys are seeking to have a federal attempt to seize the dinosaur dismissed by questioning the legal basis for the case, in both U.S. and Mongolian law.

Paleontologists have supported Mongolian President Tsakhia Elbegdorj's claim on the fossils, saying that clearly identifiable fossils from this species, an Asian relative of the North American T. rex, have been found in only one rock formation within Mongolia.

Combine this probable origin with Mongolian law making its fossils government property, and you have the basis for the case that the dinosaur should go to Mongolia. [ See Photos of Seized Tyrannosaur Skeleton ]

The Manhattan U.S. Attorney is seeking to seize the 75 percent-complete dinosaur on behalf of Mongolia, making the legal argument that Prokopi imported it knowing it was stolen and provided a false description of it on customs forms.

  1. Science news from NBCNews.com
    1. NOAA
      Cosmic rays may spark Earth's lightning

      All lightning on Earth may have its roots in space, new research suggests.

    2. How our brains can track a 100 mph pitch
    3. Moth found to have ultrasonic hearing
    4. Quantum network could secure Internet

Prokopi's attorneys, Peter Tompa and Michael McCullough, say the U.S. Attorney does not have a legal basis to seize the fossils. What's more, they argue, there is no conclusive evidence the fossils came out of the ground in Mongolia about 10 years ago, as paleontologists have said. They also argue that Mongolian law does not clearly declare all fossils state property.

Separately from their formal attempt to end the case, Tompa and McCullough released a photo showing what appears to be a fossilized dinosaur tooth. This photo, they said, undercuts the Mongolian claim on the dinosaur because it shows a fossil from the same species of dinosaur, a Tarbosaurus bataar, on sale for tourists in a Mongolian-run museum. (Mongolian law does not allow private ownership of its fossils, so they cannot be sold legally within the country.)

"If it is illegal to sell fossils in Mongolia, then why are fossils being sold in the Natural History Museum? We plan to introduce the photograph, along with other evidence, as this case goes forward," McCullough told LiveScience in an email.

However, as of yet, they have not revealed who took the photo or provided a sworn statement verifying what it shows and other details that would allow the photo to be entered as evidence in the case.  

In response, the Mongolian government has conducted an investigation, said Robert Painter, attorney for Elbegdorj.

Courtesy of Michael McCullough LLC
This image shows a fossilized Tarbosaurus bataar tooth for sale in a Mongolian museum, according to attorneys for fossil dealer Eric Prokopi. Mongolian law makes fossils found within its borders state property; Prokopi's lawyers maintain this photo undercuts the Mongolian claim on a Tarbosaurus skeleton he restored and tried to sell. The Mongolia government says no fossils have been sold in the museum.

The Mongolian government maintains that its law is clear when it comes to the state ownership of fossils, and that it has a history of enforcing its laws. According to information Painter provided, official Mongolia records going back to 2003 show at least several seizures of fossils nearly every year, ranging from an ancient mammal knuckle bone to dinosaur eggs, petrified trees and entire animal skeletons.

As for the alleged sale of a fossil in the museum, the museum leases the space for souvenir shops to private retailers, and museum curators have said that no tenant in those spaces has sold fossils, according to the information Painter provided.

McCullough maintained that the recent Mongolian seizures of fossils were not sufficient evidence to allow the United States to seize the dinosaur and give it to Mongolia. The issue is whether or not Mongolia has an ownership interest in the fossils, which it does not, he said. Mongolia may seek to stop the export of fossils, but the United States does not enforce other countries' export laws without a treaty, which in this case does not exist, he said.

Mongolian officials have also determined that Prokopi visited the country in 2008, 2009 and 2011, Painter said.

An English fossil dealer shipped the Tarbosaurus fossils to Prokopi, who prepared them and then attempted to sell them at auction on May 20. However, Elbegdorj, with support from paleontologists, attempted to stop the sale, saying the fossils were almost certainly taken illegally from Mongolia. The sale of the fossils, for more than $1 million, was put on hold, and in June, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York filed a civil case to seize the fossils, with the intent of returning them to Mongolia.

Follow Wynne Parry on Twitter @Wynne_Parry or LiveScience @livescience. We're also on Facebook  and Google+.

© 2012 LiveScience.com. All rights reserved.


Discussion comments


Most active discussions

  1. votes comments
  2. votes comments
  3. votes comments
  4. votes comments