By
updated 12/19/2012 8:49:36 AM ET 2012-12-19T13:49:36

Instagram's new Terms of Use have made some people pretty upset, as well as confused, about what the service can or cannot do with your photos — so much so, in fact, that many users are looking for photo sharing alternatives. But a good substitute would have to offer a lot more than fancy filters.

What features would an alternative have to have to qualify as a worthy substitute for instagram? There are four: it must be a mobile app with an integrated camera, it must offer filters, it must have a big pool of users who share within the app and a policy that doesn't reserve the right to use members' photos in ads (the suspicion of which started the Instagram uproar). Using this criteria,  ex-Instagrammers  are left with two options.

Twitter

The microblogging site recently updated its mobile app with filters similar to those of Instagram. While Twitter's photo filters are not as elegant, they're easy to apply. ( See a side-by-side comparison. ) Further, photographers can opt for Instagram's iconic square format or a rectangular one. With more than 500,000 users (about five times more than Instagram), Twitter provides a very large audience. Twitter has been a frontrunner in terms of user privacy, and it is the only large network to declare its support of  Do Not Track . Its terms of service say that it runs advertising, but does not include the right to use your content in ads.

Flickr

Once the leader in photo sharing, Flickr now has around 50 million registered users. Flickr recently updated its mobile app for iPhone and Android with photo filters, provided by Aviary, the same company that provides them to Twitter. But Flickr added a bigger selection of filters and editing tools compared with Twitter.

One of Flickr's benefits is the ability to upload multiple photos and then edit by swiping through the images. Instagram and Twitter allow uploading only one photo at a time. While the community may not be as social as other networks, you can easily share your finished photos to Facebook, Twitter and Tumblr. Further, you can easily choose from Flickr's privacy options —  public, friends and family, only family, only friends, only you — for each photo before you share it. You can even assign a safety rating, ranging from safe to restricted, which will determine when your public photos are shown in search results on Flickr.

Unlike either Twitter or Instagram, Flickr offers an  ad-free option  — for $25 a year.

If you can live without filters, you might also consider the Pinterest or Tumblr apps. Both mobile versions have an integrated camera and thriving communities that number around 25 million. Tumblr offers limited advertising opportunities to its members, but claims no right to use a member's photo or other content in ads. Pinterest does not include ads at this time.

© 2012 TechNewsDaily

Discuss:

Discussion comments

,

Most active discussions

  1. votes comments
  2. votes comments
  3. votes comments
  4. votes comments