IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.

Loan guarantee to United Airlines again denied

United Airlines on Monday lost a bid to secure a federal loan guarantee, a fresh setback to the carrier's efforts to emerge from bankruptcy.
UNITED AIRLINES
United Airlines failed to cement a federal loan guarantee. Now, the No. 2 carrier will either secure a stronger commitment from banks or, if that fails, seek equity elsewhere. Either option is seen leading to further cutbacks.United Airlines / AP
/ Source: The Associated Press

United Airlines on Monday lost a bid to secure a federal loan guarantee, a fresh setback to the carrier’s efforts to emerge from bankruptcy. The decision by a federal panel barred the airline from making any other attempts to secure government backing.

The Air Transportation Stabilization Board said that after studying the airline’s latest application, submitted last week, it would not change the panel’s June 17 decision to reject United’s request for a $1.6 billion federal loan guarantee.

“All members of the board join in the decision to deny United’s request for reconsideration, and the board’s June 17 decision stands,” the board said in a letter Monday to United Airlines’ chief financial officer, Frederic Brace.

United — the nation’s second largest carrier — was making its third attempt to secure federal backing as it tries to emerge from bankruptcy.

The airline had filed a request for $1.1 billion in federal backing, down from the request for $1.6 billion, which was rejected by the board in a 2-1 decision.

In Monday’s letter, the board said it “carefully considered the additional financial information provided by United.” But in the end, the board concluded — as it did in its June 17th rejection — that granting the loan guarantee wasn’t necessary to ensure the viability of the nation’s aviation system, a requirement for receiving federal assistance.

The board determined that the new information “does not alter in a material manner the rationales underlying the board’s June 17th decision,” said the letter, signed by Michael Kestenbaum, ATSB’s executive director.

The board again noted that the airline had taken positive steps to pare costs and strengthen its competitive standing. But the panel once again said that credit markets have improved since the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks, meaning the company has a chance of getting the financing it needs without federal assistance.

United, responding to the board’s decision, said in a statement that while it disagreed with the decision, “We are gratified by the ATSB’s public recognition of our progress and are already moving forward to secure the exit financing we need to take United out of bankruptcy. The message from the ATSB is that we can get the exit financing we need on our own.”

United has said it needs about $2 billion in order to pay back the creditors who funded its bankruptcy restructuring and to emerge from Chapter 11. The nation’s two largest banks, Citigroup and J.P. Morgan Chase, agreed last year to provide that exit loan package if the government would guarantee much of it.

With the prospect of government backing now gone, United can either secure a stronger commitment from banks or, if that fails, get equity from elsewhere. Either option is likely to entail further cost-cutting and other changes.

ATSB’s decision closed the door on allowing United to make a fourth request for federal backing. “The board will not accept any further submissions from United with respect to the application,” the letter said.

The board was established by Congress to oversee a $10 billion loan program, part of an airline industry bailout after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

The board has issued six loan guarantees totaling $1.56 billion. Carriers that have gotten help from the board include US Airways, which received a $900 million loan guarantee, and America West, which got a $380 million loan guarantee.

The decision on United comes as Treasury Department investigators are looking into whether any inappropriate political pressure was applied to a board as it considered United’s request.

Sen. Peter Fitzgerald, R-Ill., has asked the department’s inspector general to investigate whether board member Brian Roseboro, who voted against United’s request on June 17, was pressured to change his vote. Roseboro is an undersecretary at Treasury and the department’s representative on the board.

Fitzgerald, who opposed the loan guarantee, said media reports suggested that Treasury Secretary John Snow was being pressured to remove Roseboro from the board and replace him with someone who would vote in favor of the application by the Elk Grove Village, Ill.-based airline. Snow has rejected those allegations.

United’s requests for federal backing have been the subject of intense lobbying by both sides. The airline’s supporters, including House Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Ill., pressing for the federal loan guarantees, while the airline’s rivals are against them.

“Obviously, we’re disappointed that the loan guarantee didn’t go through,” said Pete Jeffries, a Hastert spokesman. “In the meantime, the speaker fully supports United’s leaders and its employees as they work to fully emerge from bankruptcy.”

Hastert talked with Snow on June 17, the day the board rejected United’s request. That same day, the Treasury Department issued a statement saying if United Airlines filed a revised request it would be open to considering it. The Transportation Department — whose representative on the board had voted to defer a decision for one week — issued a similar statement.