Skip navigation

All In With Chris Hayes, Tuesday, November 24th, 2015

Read the transcript from the Tuesday show

  Most Popular
Most viewed

Date: November 24, 2015
Guest: Craig Futterman, Laura Washington, Marq Claxton, Steve King,
Charlie Pierce, Greg Fisher


CHRIS HAYES, MSNBC HOST (voice-over): Tonight on ALL IN --

MAYOR RAHM EMANUEL (D), CHICAGO: It is fine to be passionate. But it
is essential that it remain peaceful.

HAYES: Chicago releases video of the police shooting of Laquan

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: People have a right to be angry. People have a
right to protest. People have a right to free speech. But they do not
have a right to commit criminal acts.

HAYES: Tonight, a murder charge for the police officer more than 400
days later. We`ll go to Chicago for the latest.

Then --

details of what happened.

HAYES: In the wake of Turkey`s downing of a Russian jet, cooler heads
prevail at the White House.

OBAMA: My top priority is going to be to ensure that this does not

HAYES: As hotter heads vie for the president`s job.

waterboarding? You bet your ass I`d approve it. You bet your ass. In a
heart beat.

HAYES: Tonight, the grave importance of 2016`s first 3:00 a.m.

And the new polling on Donald Trump`s brand-new threat in Iowa.

I am. I do not like green eggs and ham.

HAYES: Ted Cruz makes his move.

CRUZ: I`m a big fan of Donald Trump`s, but I`m not a fan of
government registries of American citizens.

HAYES: When ALL IN starts right now.


HAYES: Good evening from New York. I`m Chris Hayes.

We have breaking news tonight out of Chicago, where officials just
released video of the shooting death of 17-year-old Laquan McDonald who was
killed by a Chicago police officer on October 20th, 2014, 13 months ago.
That officer has just been arrested and indicted for first degree murder --
the first time in recent memory that a Chicago police officer has been
charged with a criminal offense for shooting while on duty.

Video of the shooting which we will broadcast in a moment was to be
released no later than tomorrow by court order. On October 20th of last
year, police responded to a call that a person breaking into cars. They
found Laquan McDonald carrying a knife, a three-inch blade. The video
seems to show McDonald was walking away from the arriving police vehicles
when the shooting happened.

The dashcam video of the shooting death of Laquan McDonald we`re about
to show you is disturbing. We have blurred out portions of the footage.

The video you see was described by Cook County state`s attorney Anita
Alvarez this way. McDonald crossed over the white line divider away from
the officer, an officer -- officers and Officer Jason Van Dyke has taken at
least one step toward him. You`re going to see this here as they come out
of the car.

The officer then opens fire, that first bullet spinning him around as
he hits the ground. His body jerks. The video captures what appears to be
two puffs of smoke coming from the ground near his body caused by fired
bullets. McDonald is still lying on the street when the last visible shot
is fired, 16 in all.

State`s attorney who today announced charges of first degree murder
against Officer Van Dyke summed it up this way.


determined that Officer Van Dyke was on the scene for less than 30 seconds
before he started shooting. In addition to the fact that all evidence
indicates that he began shooting approximately six seconds after getting
out of his vehicle. An analysis of the video establishes that 14 to 15
seconds pass from the time the defendant fired his first shot to clear
visual evidence of a final shot. For approximately 13 of those seconds,
Laquan was lying on the ground.


HAYES: Ten days after the initial shooting, Chicago police says that
Officer Jason Van Dyke was stripped of his powers and placed on deck duty.
Today, he was charged with first degree murder. He turned himself in at
the Cook County courthouse and ordered held without bond.

The timing is noteworthy. The shooting was 13 months ago. This
announcement comes one day before a court ordered deadline for release of
the video of that shooting. A video that has been in police possession
since the night it happened.

Today, Alvarez acknowledged she moved up her announcement of charges
against Officer Van Dyke because of the release date of the video.


ALVAREZ: While we would very preferred for the investigation to have
run its full course and enabled our federal patients to complete their
evaluation in its entirety, I felt compelled in the interests of public
safety to announce these state charges today. With these charges, we are
bringing a full measure of justice that this demands.


HAYES: Back in February, we here at ALL IN filed a freedom of
information request with the Chicago police department asking for any
dashcam video that might show what actually happened that night. CPD
denied our request. Multiple people did see the police dashcam video of
the shooting death of McDonald before today, including lawyers for the
family of Laquan McDonald who entered into a $5 million settlement in April
with the city of Chicago before a lawsuit had even been filed -- a
settlement that was voted on and approved by the city council.

The video has been the source of tremendous activism and litigation,
but requests for its release were essentially met with stony silence from
Chicago officials until the last 48 hours. Then late this afternoon, Mayor
Rahm Emanuel and Police Superintendent Garry McCarthy held a news
conference in which their primary focus was preparing for possible


EMANUEL: I believe this is a moment that can build bridges of
understanding rather than become a barrier of misunderstanding. I
understand that the people will be upset and will want to protest when they
see this video. But I would like to echo the comments of the McDonald
family. They have asked for calm and for those who choose to speak out, to
do it peacefully.


HAYES: Right now at this hour, there are some protesters assembling
in Chicago.

Joining me now Craig Futterman. He`s clinical professor of law at
University of Chicago who successful Freedom of Information Act request led
to the release of Laquan McDonald`s autopsy report.

And, Craig, I want you to give some context to people that are just
coming to this story tonight. This young man was shot and killed 14 months
ago, 13 months ago. And essentially, there was not a whole lot of coverage
of it and then a whistleblower came to you and a journalist named Jamie

What happened?

Yes, as you just said, this was a shooting that received the same kind of
coverage that most police shootings receive in Chicago. And in Chicago,
we`ve had a police shooting on average of one time a week for the last 30
years, 75 percent of the people who have been shot have been African-
American. And until today, there has never been a single criminal
prosecution of any officer has shot someone, a Chicago police officer shot
someone on duty.

So, when we saw -- when is I read this, honestly, it glazed over me in
the same way these police blotters glaze over everybody else, because sort
of the typical story we`ve heard before. It said young man had a knife,
lunged at officer, officer shoots in self-defense, nothing to see here.
It`s under investigation.

HAYES: And then someone comes to you on the inside who essentially
has seen the video and says, they`re concerned this is not being
sufficiently investigated. Am I getting that right?

FUTTERMAN: Yes. Someone confidence sources from inside were worried
about the code of silence and were worried that this would never come to
light, and were worried that there never would be any accountability.

And so, as we investigated this, then we talked with witnesses. We
got the autopsy which showed rather than single shots, self-defense to the
chest but that the young man was actually shot 16 times. And then when we
talked to witnesses and also when I talked with people who had seen the
video from the inside who took me through it frame by frame, just as you --
even as the state`s attorney described it, that there was -- they shot him
while he`s walking away, walking away toward the fence.

Not they, Officer Van Dyke shoots him walking away toward the fence
and then he goes down to the ground and then unloads his clip into the
body, 16 shots in total and really different from the police story.

Then the code of silence goes immediately into effect. Police
officers who arrive on the scene cover it up. Tell the witnesses to get
the heck out of there. A witness who was there, a woman who said, "Stop
shooting, stop shooting" during the entire time when the officer was
unloading his clip into this young boy`s body, she refuses to leave and she
reports she`s taken down to the station, locked in a room, intimidated,
told she didn`t see the what they saw.

And then worse, there`s an officer who comes to the scene and there`s
a Burger King kitty corner which doesn`t capture the shooting but they have
surveillance tape that captures events leading up to the shooting. There`s
seven different angles, seven different video files. Police officer goes
into the Burger King and the police officer deletes every single one of
those seven files.

The irony and poetic justice is there`s actually tape of the Burger
King tape running while he`s deleting the files. There is a videotape of
the officer deleting that.

So, one of the questions we have about the code of silence and this is
a historic day that an officer is actually charged and being held to
account for shooting and taking the life of a young man.

What also about the officers who helped to cover it up? What about
the official narrative that was given out and that may have been the
official narrative, it may have been the official narrative unless we all
pushed for in and this came out.

HAYES: All right. Craig Futterman, thank you very much.

Joining me now, Laura Washington, "Chicago Sun-Times" columnist and
ABC 7 analyst.

Part of what you heard from Craig was context. Those are
investigations he undertook which I cannot and we cannot independently
corroborate in terms of what he said about witnesses on the scene, et
cetera. That is his investigation.

But that said, Laura, the timeline of this is so bizarre in so many
ways -- 14 months, 13 months of silence and then an absolute flurry of
activity from all systems go from the city in the last 48 hours. What is
the mood like there in Chicago?

Chris, you hit the nail on the head. People are wondering why it took 14
months, why this sort of hurry, this wait and then hurry up approach.

They had the video. The police department, the state`s attorney, the
mayor`s office could have if they had wanted to had the video from day one.
That video I think tells a very definite story. Sure you need to do an
investigation. Sure you need to interview witnesses, but it certainly
shouldn`t have taken a year for these charges to be filed.

You heard Anita Alvarez herself say she did this to help stem
violence, a violent response to keep the community calm. She should have
been releasing it because it was a crime or because it was an alleged crime
and she should have been pursuing charges, and she shouldn`t be doing it
today because she has to do it because she`s worried about unrest, but she
should have been doing it because she`s the chief investigative officer for
the county.

And so, people are wondering why did this take so long? I this I one
of the answers is, it`s politics. Mayor Rahm Emanuel as you know ran for
re-election starting in the fall of last year into the spring of this year,
the campaign took about six months. That was a period of time during which
that investigation could have born fruit and obviously, again, from October
until the spring, they had the video.

But it appears at least to some people that they withheld -- they held
the video back as long as they could because they knew they were going to
be very severe political implications.

HAYES: Let me stop for a second, Laura, and just sort of recap for
folks that have not seen the video. I mean, what it shows is this young
man walking down the middle of the street. He passes one police car. He
keeps walking.

He -- another police car pulls up, two officers s get out. Here`s the
dashcam video again. We`re not going to play on a loop, but I do want
people to sort of be acquainted with what the facts are. There`s a young
man, Laquan McDonald.

You see him walking down the divider. Police have been called.
There`s a report of a young man walking around possibly with a knife,
three-inch blade. Those two officers get out. The one on the left drew
his weapon.

And within seconds, that first shot spins him around. He hits the
grounds. And as he`s on the ground, shots continue to be fired unloading
the entire clip, 16 bullets into him.

Later on, other police will come to the scene. You see he`s still
being shot there. Other police will come onto the scene.

The partner of Officer Van Dyke comes, you saw right there, and kicks
the knife out of the hand of the inert dead body at that point one imagines
of Laquan McDonald. That body remains there for quite a bit of time on the
dashcam video.

So, that is the video at the heart of this. And, Laura, here`s my
question to you. That was released today but people have known been this
video, describe this had video, described this video in public settings, be
have talked about it in the city council where the council voted on a $5
million settlement.

I mean, what has the feeling of Chicagoans been about the wait for
this to be made public?

WASHINGTON: Well, I think I would go back to what Mr. Futterman said
earlier. There`s a long history of not being forthcoming in investigative
-- in investigations around police shootings. And this is another -- it`s
just the most recent example where the police department, where the state`s
attorney hides behind the excuse that everything is under investigation.

And they try to basically sweep these things under the rug. You`re
right. There was a $5 million settlement. The city council unanimously
supported that settlement back in the spring, but if there were any
questions asked, if there were any demands for that video to be released,
we`re only hearing about them now.

HAYES: I want to be clear too, two things. One is that the family of
Laquan McDonald, my understanding, did not want this video made public.

WASHINGTON: That`s correct.

HAYES: That`s an important thing for it to be public as people watch
this and process if that was their request. Of course, an independent
journalist sued actually like us, we had filed a FOIA-- we even filed an
appeal and were rejected and sued and was found in court there`s a public
document, which is why you`re seeing it today.

The city fought tooth and nail to keep this out of the public domain.

WASHINGTON: Because again, it has severe political implications.

Mayor Rahm Emanuel has been criticized for the conduct of the police
department. A large number of the city council members call for the
resignation of Superintendent McCarthy. This is just one more scar on the
record of Superintendent McCarthy. And you also have an election coming up
in March. We have a Democratic primary which Anita Alvarez is running for
re-election who you heard from earlier, and everyone is worried about how
this will look.

HAYES: All right. Laura Washington, thanks for your time.

One quick correction: my understanding, I mentioned that he died. It
appears he died in the ambulance later on. We should also note that the
original accounts from police which we`ll talk about more in a moment went
through a whole variety of actions, Laquan McDonald allegedly did that that
video do not show.

We`ll have more breaking coverage of this news out of Chicago up next.
I`m going to go through the video, his death at the hands of a police
officer with former police officer Marq Claxton.


HAYES: We`re continuing to follow the breaking news out of Chicago,
where tonight, police released dashcam video of the shooting death of 17-
year-old Laquan McDonald. I`ll speak with former Police Officer Marq
Claxton about what we see in the video and the timing of its release, next.


HAYES: Again, breaking news at this hour, Chicago officials have
released video of the shooting death of 17-year-old Laquan McDonald which
occurred on October 20th, 2014, 13 months ago. We`ve been covering the
story here on ALL IN since February, when we first filed a FOIA asking for
dashcam video and were rejected by the CPD on the grounds that it might
taint the due process for the officer involved.

The city just released the footage hours after the police officer who
shot Laquan McDonald 16 times, Jason Van Dyke, was charged with first
degree murder.

Joining me now, Marq Claxton, former NYPD detective and director of
the Black Law Enforcement Alliance, and my friend, MSNBC national
correspondent, Trymaine Lee.

Now, I want to show this video one more time. It will be the third
time we play it and we will not play it again. If you do not want to see
it, I want to let you know that. We`re very sensitive to the fact this is
a person`s life you are watching extinguished here. At the same time, it
is essentially the grounds for the facts as the issue here.

So, gentlemen, if you`ll watch along with me, this is the dashcam
pulling up. This young man, the police called that someone was walking
around. Some I believe said he had knifed a few tires. You see him
pulling up his pants there.

He moves past the first car. It is the second car on the far left is
Officer Van Dyke, on the right is his partner. Officer Van Dyke has the
weapon out, and he fires a bullet right there as Laquan McDonald walks
away, putting him to the ground. He proceeds to put 15 more bullets into

At the end there, plumes of smoke come up, which we have blurred out.
He`s still firing there. So, he is firing all of that time. That first
shot spins him around, puts him on the ground. His partner comes and kicks
the knife away.

And the body will continue to lay there as other police vehicles come
and he is in the street for quite some time.

Marq, let me start with you. As a police officer, your reaction to
what you see there.

MARQ CLAXTON, FORMER NYPD DETECTIVE: Well, you know, Chris it`s very
easy to discuss what we`ve just seen in terms of tactics, but I think that
really doesn`t even touch on what the real issues are here. I think it`s
obscene and as disturbing and as painful as the video is, it will be for
many people who are witnessing the video.

I think there are larger issues that are disturbing and enraging folk.
And that is the process, how do we get to this point? You know, why did it
take as long as it has taken to get to this point? And are we on a course
that`s headed for true justice or are we allowing this, quote/unquote,
"continued investigation", now concluding investigation to get in the way
of actual justice?

This is not a matter of what is or isn`t professional policing because
what you witnessed there has nothing to do with proper tactics and
professional policing. What we`re really talking about are some deep
systemic issues that are ripe for reform.

HAYES: One of the reasons that I think there`s been a lot of anger
about this case and there are folks protesting in Chicago right now,
although we should say there was a lot of mentions from the officialdom of
Chicago about the possibility of unrest and violence and so far, it has
been very organized and peaceful protests from the folks in Chicago.

But, Trymaine, initial accounts of this, you know, they were the kinds
of accounts that we`ve heard often as Craig Futterman said, lunged at
officers, had a knife. There was one account early on that he had broken a
window of a police car.

Again, we remember some of the accounts about Tamir Rice, the young
14-year-old boy shot and killed in Cleveland and then you see the video.
And it, to me, unmasks a little bit why folks have a little bit of
skepticism sometimes against -- about initial accounts.

cases have been captured on video, the public is more aware than ever. But
I think if you`ve covered police and you`ve covered crime for any amount of
time, you get used to the idea of the furtive movements, of the lunging.
The first thing the police will rule out is their narrative of what

Looking at this video, it`s striking how at odds what we see with our
own eyes, how odds that is with the narrative that he lunged at someone.
And I think when you take a look at what`s happening in Chicago now and
people are upset for many reasons that most of the shots happened while he
was on the ground, that this video existed for a year, and no movement at

But it comes on the heel of Rekia Boyd case where the Officer Dante
Servin apparently perhaps intoxicated with an unregistered gun fired over
his shoulder kills this young girl and he`s acquitted.

HAYES: Off duty.

LEE: Off duty.

HAYES: He is charged with negligent manslaughter I believe. He is
acquitted of that.

LEE: That`s right.

HAYES: Then we should note after a long period of time and people in
Chicago very upset about that, the superintendent yesterday, the day before
they know this video is going to come out, says he should lose his job.

LEE: The idea of this timing that is of a political nature. Is there
-- had there been a cover-up?

HAYES: Marq, let me ask you this. When you talk about -- Trymaine
was talking about the possibility of a cover-up. Craig Futterman raised
that specter. And, again, I don`t have the evidence to suggest that`s what

That said, when you talk about something systemic, are there questions
you would want answered and documents you would want to see from the other
officers present that night to be confident this was dealt with integrity?

CLAXTON: Yes, absolutely. There`s so much information out there that
we haven`t been at least supplied up to this point. And some of it, of
course, you won`t be privy to because you don`t want to compromise whatever
prosecution may occur moving forward.

But there are many questions yet to be answered. One question that
has been raised is, there is some possibility that there`s some missing
forensic evidence. A videotape from a Burger King restaurant, for example.
There`s a section, a large section of it that seems to have been misplaced
or destroyed or something along those lines.

So, those type of questions would then leaded you into whether there
is some sort of -- if there is, and I`m not saying there is or is not --
whether there is some conspiratorial kind of action or movement and that
would actually explain why it would take these 13 months, if you will, for
there to be a decision by a prosecutor`s office to pursue charges against a
police officer, on duty, off duty, doesn`t make a difference here. And
what that does is say to a lot of people, there is not a symbiotic
relationship between prosecutor`s offices and police departments that there
is an incestuous relationship between those two agencies and too often,
those two agencies can work to obstruct and get in the way of true justice.

HAYES: All right. Marq Claxton and Trymaine Lee, thank you,
gentlemen, both.

That`s a live shot in Chicago. There have been some protests there.

I want to clarify a few things before we move off the story.

First of all, the attorney for the Officer Van Dyke in question put
out a statement saying that the videotape is two-dimensional. It doesn`t
show things like depth. It doesn`t show the perspective from his client.
And clearly, that`s going to be part of the case that he makes on behalf of
his client as his client faces murder charges in Cook County.

Number two, I should say we have no evidence and are not suggesting
there was a cover-up independently. We have no evidence to suggest that`s
the case. There are questions about how this was handled internally. And
I should say, the city of Chicago and the state`s attorneys office in Cook
County say there were multiple parallel investigations from federal, IPRA,
which is independent civilian oversight, that everyone was doing that, in
parallel and that is the reason that there was no forthcoming movement on
this, that they did not want to tamper that investigation.

I just want to make very clear that is the case being made by
officials in Chicago on this night in the wake of the very, very
disconcerting video released of the shooting death of 17-year-old Laquan

Up next, three men in police custody in relation to a shooting last
night that left five Black Lives Matter protesters injured. The latest on
that attack, ahead.


HAYES: All right. You`re looking live at a shot of Chicago
where there are protesters, a lot of the police out in force. So far, the
protests have been peaceful. There is a lot of organizing happening in
Chicago, has been for a long time towards the CPD and the Chicago police
knows that and has been interacting with those organizers and protesters
for quite some time, as well.

Meanwhile, police in Minneapolis have three men in custody after five
activists were shot at a Black Lives Matter protest last night. For more
than a week, demonstrators have been camped outside the 4th Precinct in
Minneapolis following the fatal police shooting of an unarmed young black
man Jamar Clark November 15. There has been reporting that protesters have
been harassed and had
racial epithets shouted at them by people who have come to harass them
during the protest.

Last night was an even more terrifying scene when a gunman shot five
at the protest. According to the New York Times, Misty Nor (ph), an
organizer at the Minneapolis arm of Black Lives Matter said the shooting
happened as demonstrators were escorting three masked men who had been
behaving suspiciously away from the site of the rally.

When they reached a dark area, the men turned around and fired on the
demonstrators before fleeing.

Police arrested a 23-year-old white man in Bloomington, a Minneapolis
suburb earlier today and are questioning two other white men in their 20s
who voluntarily
turned themselves in.

Another suspect, a 32 Hispanic man was questioned and released. None
of the men identified.

Five shooting victims were taken to area hospitals with injuries that
have thus far been deemed nonlife-threatening.

Today there was another massive march in Minneapolis for Jamar Clark,
a Justice Department investigation into Clark`s shooting death just
recently began and is ongoing. The protests continue.


HAYES: Amid a bidding war of bellicosity among the Republican
candidates, stoking a climate of fear and apprehension in the wake of the
Paris attacks, today
the world took a dangerous step closer to the brink.

In the first hostilities between Russia and a NATO member since the
Cold War, Turkey shot down a Russian warplane that it says crossed from
Syria into Turkish air space. Russia insists the jet was flying over

Those two countries have long seemed to be on a collision course with
Turkey opposing the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, Russia`s
main client in
the Middle East while Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan maintained his
country`s right to defend its borders and said the only reason worse
incidents haven`t
occurred before is the cool headedness of Turkey.

Russian President Vladimir Putin called the incident a, quote, "stab
in the back," and vowed there would be consequences.

Meanwhile, two very different leaders were meeting today at the White
House. President Obama and French President Francois Hollande who is
trying to build support from world leaders for increased efforts against
ISIS in response to the Paris attacks. In a joint press conference, Obama
sounded a note of caution to Russia and Turkey.


important right now for us to make sure that both the Russians and the
Turks are talking to each other, find out exactly what happened and take
measures to discourage any kind of escalation.


HAYES: That`s a role Obama has played throughout his presidency to
chagrin of many critics, a kind of anti-Putin in disposition at the very
least, urging calm rationalism over bluster.

At that press conference today, the president took a stand against the
of fear and panic gripping the country since the attacks in Paris.


OBAMA: Even as we`re vigilant, we cannot and we will not succumb to
fear, nor can we allow fear to divide us, that`s how terrorists win. We
cannot give them the victory of changing how we go about living our lives.
To those who want to harm us, our actions have shown that we have too much
resolve and too much character.

Americans will not be terrorized.


HAYES: Less than eight years ago, amid a hotly contested Democratic
presidential primary, Hillary Clinton`s campaign ran an instantly iconic ad
implicitly questioning Barack Obama`s readiness to be commander-in-chief,
the 3:00 a.m. phone call.


ANNOUNCER: It`s 3:00 a.m. and your children are safe and asleep, but
there`s a phone in the White House and it`s ringing. Something`s happening
in the world. Your vote will decide who answers that call.


HAYES: On days like today with the specter of military conflict
between two world powers more present than at any time in decades, that
message holds up at
a certain level. Who do you want answering that phone call? In this case
possibly trying to avert World War III.

In that context, here`s the kind of rhetoric coming from the
Republican presidential candidates.


SEN. MARCO RUBIO, (R) FLORIDA: I believe we should be carrying out
attacks against Sunni leadership nodes, videotaping the whole thing and
putting it up on YouTube so the world can see they`re not invincible. I
want the world to see how these ISIS leaders cry like babies when they`re

already here.

SEN. TED CRUZ, (R) TEXAS: Of course they are. Of course they are and
more are coming. And ISIS has made clear their intention to carry out
terror attacks just like the one in Paris here in America and to try to
murder hundreds or if they have their way thousands of innocent Americans.

water boarding, you bet your ass I`d prove it. I would approve more than

And don`t kid yourself, folks. It works. Okay? And you know what,
if it doesn`t work, they deserve it anyway for what they`re doing to us.


HAYES: Joining me now Charlie Pierce, writer-at-large for Esquire.

Charlie, you`ve been covering politics a long time. You`re even
written a little bit about taking seriously some people`s fears in the
aftermath of something as horrific as Paris. What do you make of this line
of criticism of the president that he is too Spock-like, too calm, too
sober and not doing enough to sort of get into the guts of an American
populace feeling riled up and scared?

CHARLIE PIERCE, ESQUIRE: I think it`s a very good thing we have the
person in the White House that we do rather than some of the other voices
we just heard in that segment.

But the interesting thing to me, Chris, is that in the face of having
one of his warplanes shot down, Vladimir Putin looks just as is feckless as
everybody says
the president is.

HAYES: Right.

PIERCE: There`s no good answer in that place.

People are looking for a coherent policy to address an incredibly
incoherent situation.

HAYES: Well, this is -- I mean the point about Putin is an important
one here, which is ultimately, there is this is widening gap opening up
between the language of the campaign and what plays in a hall to 10,000
people and the language needed to navigate what is an incredibly perilous
situation in which a dozen different countries are engaging in active
military campaigns in same place, supporting different proxies that is the
kind of thing if you read your history
books, looks like the kind of thing that has started world wars in the

PIERCE: It certainly has started big wars if not necessarily world
wars or
wars I guess in the world as it was known at the time.

Yeah, I am really -- I`m on the verge of never voting for anyone who
prescribes a no-fly zone in that area. You`ve got four or five different
air forces all with different missions, some of which contradict each other
all in the same sky space. How are you going to establish a no-fly zone?
And once you`ve done that, what`s the next step?

HAYES: Well, that`s exactly what we encountered today. I mean, no-
fly zone, we should be clear here, Hillary Clinton has called for a no-fly
zone. It is essentially a consensus call except for, I`m understanding
correctly Rand Paul on the Republican side.

But a no-fly zone means there are consequences when it`s violated.
Well, today, we`re watching this play out in real-time.


I mean, as I said, I think, you know, you`re looking for a coherent
policy in a very incoherent situation. And in a situation that doesn`t
look like it`s going to become more coherent anytime soon.

You know, I was struck today by I remembered back in the -- in 1962
when I was hiding under my desk at St. Peter`s elementary school in the
middle of the Cuban missile school, a Russian man, the Cuban anti-aircraft
battery shot down
one of our U-2 planes. And historians now agree that was pretty much as
close as we came to losing everything.

But they also agree that both Khrushchev and John Kennedy ignored the
bellicose people in their inner circles and so frightened by what could
come from that event that forced them to cut the deal they eventually cut.

HAYES: You know, this is an incredibly important historical lesson
that sometimes the strongest, most courageous, difficult things for a world
leader to do
is to act in restraint. And in that moment, those twos leaders did that,
thank god. And that`s -- you know, whoever becomes president and next
occupies that office is going to be someone that voters will have to decide
whether they have the temperament and the record to act in a similar way.

Charlie Pierce, thank you very much.

PIERCE: Thanks, Chris.

HAYES: Still ahead, a big week for the Ted Cruz campaign with new
polling showing him just behind Donald Trump in Iowa. As he picks up an
endorsement from Congressman Steve King, I will talk with Congressman King


HAYES: The Ted Cruz presidential campaign is having an awfully good
week-and-a-half. Last night Cruz scored the coveted endorsement of
celebrity conservative actor James Woods who has labeled President Obama a
true abomination and yesterday went on the record backing Cruz after the
two spoke for 40 minutes by phone about our love of this country.
According to Woods` Twitter account, "this man is the real deal," Woods
wrote of Cruz. "I`m all in."

Somewhat more importantly, Cruz last week scored the endorsement of
hard-line conservative Iowa Congressman Steve King, an immigration
restrictionist with a reputation of something of a king maker in Iowa
thanks to his strong connection to the conservative grass roots in the
first in the nation caucus state.

Cruz has raised more money than any Republican candidate other than
Jeb Bush. He has more cash on hand than any of his GOP rivals.

His strategy over the last few months has been to sort of draft behind
Donald Trump like a runner waiting until the last turn to make his move to
the front of the pack.

Cruz has been rising steadily in national polls, and this month, in a
new Quinnipiac survey out of Iowa shows Cruz within two points of Trump
among likely GOP caucus goers.

Cruz`s 23 percent support puts him solidly in front of a fading Ben
Carson, represents a 13 point increase in support since last month.

Joining me now from his home in Kiron, Iowa is Republican Congressman
Steve King who last week endorsed Ted Cruz for president.

And congressman, thank you for coming on.

My first question is, do you feel confident that Ted Cruz shares your
views on immigration?

REP. STEVE KING, (R) IOWA: I don`t have any doubt when I look at his
11-page immigration paper that he put out here a week-and-a-half or two
weeks ago, it
checks all the boxes that I would like to check with securing the border,
restoring the respect for the rule of law and establishing and ending the
sanctuary cities, the sanctuary jurisdictions in the country.

I think it goes a long ways to solve our immigration problem.

HAYES: It strikes me, congressman, that there`s been an internal
debate about immigration in the Republican Party that you have largely won.
And my question to you is, do you think if you got say a Ted Cruz
president, there would be a real opening for immigration legislation that
did some of the things you`re calling for might start towards actively
deporting the 11 million or 12 million
unauthorized immigrants? Is that a possibility if Republicans are to win
White House?

KING: I don`t think that either Ted Cruz or myself are for an
aggressive, active deportation movement at all. We`re saying, instead that
-- and here`s what I`m saying and Senator Cruz can speak for himself, but I
believe we`re in the same
place here is that when law enforcement encounters people who are
unlawfully present in America, if you`re going to respect the rule of law,
you have to put them back in the condition they`re in, the position they
were in before they broke the law. That means the lawbreakers will go home
when they`re encountered by law
enforcement but it doesn`t mean there would be a massive roundup of any

HAYES: So, you`re just going to -- what about the 11 million then? I
mean, what does life look like for those folks going forward?

KING: From my view, and I think this is important to examine the
morality of this, we have an obligation to protect the rule of law. And
they came here to live in the shadows, they didn`t come here with an
expectation they would demand a path to citizenship. So I think many of
them would live in the shadows over a period of time.

I`d rather see that than I would a reward for breaking the law that
would bring more law breakers and that`s the existence that they`ve asked

HAYES: So the policy of the sort of in the shadows.

Let me ask you about comments you made about the refugees, this has
obviously a key issue. You had this to say about assimilation, some of the
refugees from the middle East this morning. Take a listen.


KING: There`s not assimilation taking place here. And no one has
shown me an example of people from that part of the world that have
assimilated into the
broader society. And so what we`re about is building a culture in America
honors Americanism.


HAYES: You said no one has shown me an example of people from that
part of the world that have assimilated into the broader society. Can you
really defend that statement about 6 million people moral folks from the
Middle East, Muslim Americans, Arabs? Is that a defensible thing to say,
not one example of assimilation ever anywhere?

KING: That`s a reference to groups of people, not individuals. Of
course, individuals have assimilated into the broader American society.
But yet, no one has shown me an example of large groups of people that have
settled into American from that part of the world that have assimilated
into the broader American society.

And I go those places. I go to little Mogadishu in Minneapolis. I
was there a week ago Saturday. And I go to places like Dearborn, Michigan
and spend time there. And I go into the mosques, and I`ve gone into the
inner cities in the Middle East. I see the similar pattern in the United
States that I see there. There`s not assimilation taking place on the
broader scale.

HAYES: Do you really think those places are different than Chinatown
here in New York City or in any city you go to that are different than say
Italian-American neighborhoods like the one my grandfather ran a mozzarella
shop? Is that really -- you really want to say they`re different in some
deep and fundamental way?

KING: Of course I do. They bring with them Sharia law, which is
completely contradictory to the constitution. It`s incompatible with

HAYES: Let me ask you this, do you think fundamentally Muslims from
the Middle East are incompatible with American democracy?

KING: I believe that Sharia law is incompatible to American
democracy. And if you can...

HAYES: Do you think -- no, no, this is important, do you think that
Muslims from the Middle East are incompatible with American democracy.
That`s the question.

KING: I think if they`re willing to reject Sharia law, then we can
talk. But until they will do that, their view of Sharia law trumping
constitutional law is incompatible with Americanism and eventually will
break down the rule of law in our country.

HAYES: I will note that I think the they there is doing a lot of
work. But Congressman King, it`s good to have you on. Thank you very

KING: Thanks for having me on, Chris.

HAYES: Coming up, the ACUL is now suing Indiana governor Mike Pence
for refusing to accept Syrian refugees. Their grounds ahead.


HAYES: Yesterday, the ACLU filed a lawsuit against Indiana Governor
Mike Pence on behalf of a refugee agency that had to redirect a family of
Syrian refugees to Connecticut after Pence said they were not welcome in
Indiana. Pence is one of 31 governors opposing refusing or suspending the
resettlement of Syrian
refugees in their states. And some states are taking things a step

Last week, non-profit and charitable organizations around Texas
received a troubling letter from the Texas health and human services
commission instructing all refugee related agencies in the state to report
any plans of resettling Syrian
refugees and, quote, "please discontinue those plans immediately."

There are elected officials bucking the anti-refugee trend. Tonight
in Louisville, Kentucky, Mayor Greg Fisher held a community rally to
welcome refugees in which he said his is not a city of hatred and

And joining me is the Mayor of Louisville, Democrat Greg Fisher.

Mayor, why did you decide to have this event?

obviously. It`s understandable in the community. Our refugees, our people
are of the Muslim faith are concerned right now. There`s so much rhetoric
of hatred going around the country right now that I think my responsibility
as mayor is to make sure everybody feels welcome and supported here.

We`re a city of great interfaith tradition. Our Muslim population
here does
countless works of service for our city and it`s important that they felt
a, supported, but for the broader community also recognize there is an
environment of fear but we can be both safe and compassionate at the same

HAYES: I just had Congressman Steve King on from Iowa who basically
was making the case that there`s fundamentally something not American about
groups of
people in the Middle East coming and living together and worshipping
together, that that`s fundamentally outside American traditions, resistant
to assimilation. What do you make of that?

FISHER: I think that`s the kind of extremism that will people are
tired of hearing from Washington.

What leaders need to be doing is pulling people together.

I can tell you in our community when we had a natural disaster with a
tornado 20 minutes from here, our Muslim physicians were the first ones to
go and the
last ones to leave. They emphasize acts of citizenship and service to
counter this very type of notion that people fabricate that they`re not
great American citizens.

So in our city, we embrace them. That is nothing to do with us being
a safe city and a safe country. We`re strong militarily, but we need to be
strong morally, as well. And when we lose that high ground, we lose the
very essence of who we are, I believe, as Americans.

HAYES: Mayor, do you get concerned calls and emails from citizens
there, your constituents in Louisville who say I don`t want refugees to be
resettled here? I`ve think that I`ve been watching the news and I`ve been
listening to politicians talk and it sounds like they`re basically all
covert ISIS operatives?

You know, we`ve been doing work in the interfaith areas for over 20
years with our festival of faiths. We`ve got a large service tradition, as
well. So, people have worked with other folks that may not look like them,
speak the same language, worship the same god. So, that`s gone a long way
to developing what I call social muscles here. And we need a lot of social
muscles at this time in our
country with all this fear mongering that`s going on.

So, what we hear more is wanting to express support for people of all
the different faiths, all different refugees and immigrants in our city
right now. So, there`s a little murmuring, but it`s more let`s show our
support for these folks. They`re good citizens. We welcome them here in

HAYES: One of your senators, Rand Paul, introduced legislation that
would have essentially barred refugees from dozens and dozens of countries,
mostly in the
middle East and other parts of Asia and Africa. What do you think of
legislation like that?

FISHER: I think it`s the political silly season. When you take a
look at the process that refugees have to go through, 18 to 24 months to
get here, put a face on these refugees, too -- widows, orphans, kids, those
that are the most persecuted. Look, that`s what our country is supposed to
stand for to welcome
them here after them here after they`re vetted. I get that. And I`m no
saying that we just let anybody into this country.

But we need to uphold the ideas of who we are, as well. The rest of
the world is watching right now. And in fact, you know, it`s the
terrorists that are trying to divide us, extreme language is trying to
divide us, whether it`s from abroad for our own shores as well. What we`re
saying here in Louisville is we don`t buy into that. We think we can be a
safe city and a compassionate city and a welcoming city at the same time.

HAYES: Mayor Greg Fisher, thank you very much.

That is All In for this evening. The Rachel Maddow Show is up next.


<Copy: Content and programming copyright 2015 NBC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Copyright 2015 CQ-Roll Call, Inc. All materials herein are protected by
United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed,
transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written
permission of CQ-Roll Call. You may not alter or remove any trademark,
copyright or other notice from copies of the content.>

Sponsored links

Resource guide