updated 3/4/2005 11:58:44 AM ET 2005-03-04T16:58:44

A last-chance lung cancer drug that helped patients in preliminary trials didn’t do well in a follow up, a failure that surprised manufacturer AstraZeneca. The company is trying to determine why things didn’t go better.

  1. Don't miss these Health stories
    1. Splash News
      More women opting for preventive mastectomy - but should they be?

      Rates of women who are opting for preventive mastectomies, such as Angeline Jolie, have increased by an estimated 50 percent in recent years, experts say. But many doctors are puzzled because the operation doesn't carry a 100 percent guarantee, it's major surgery -- and women have other options, from a once-a-day pill to careful monitoring.

    2. Larry Page's damaged vocal cords: Treatment comes with trade-offs
    3. Report questioning salt guidelines riles heart experts
    4. CDC: 2012 was deadliest year for West Nile in US
    5. What stresses moms most? Themselves, survey says

The drug, Iressa, was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2003 for use in advanced lung cancer patients for whom standard therapy is no longer effective.

Studies showed Iressa shrank tumors in some terminally ill patients. But approval, based on preliminary studies, came with a requirement that the drug be further tested.

In a follow-up study it failed to produce an improvement that was statistically significant, prompting AstraZeneca to stop promoting it and to advise doctors that it had failed to live up to expectations.


On Friday the consumer group Public Citzen petitioned the FDA to remove Iressa from the market because of its poor performance. The group had argued against the drug’s approval, questioning its effectiveness and safety.

Mutation found
AstraZeneca told an FDA advisory committee, meeting this week to review several cancer drugs, that it is conducting a detailed analysis of the trial.

“The failure to reach statistical significance for survival in the overall population was completely unexpected,” the company said in its report to the committee.

It went on to say that Iressa does produce responses in tumors and that some groups of patients did see benefits, notably people of Asian descent and nonsmokers.

In a separate report, a study appearing this week in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute found a gene mutation involved in the development of some lung cancers that appears to occur only in nonsmokers.

Learn more about lung cancer

That study, by doctors at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, said gene mutation had increased sensitivity to Iressa. The same mutation also was found more commonly in women and patients from Japan.

While the FDA advisory committee was not scheduled to take any action on whether Iressa should remain on the market, the agency had asked the manufacturer to provide a report on its studies of the drug.

AstraZeneca said it doesn’t believe a decision on the commercial availability of the drug should be made until completion of the analysis of the trial, which it expects by May or June. In the meantime, it has advised physicians about the lack of success and noted that alternative therapies are available.

However, the company said it intends to continue to make Iressa available “as an option for patients who are deemed appropriate.”

© 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Discuss:

Discussion comments

,

Most active discussions

  1. votes comments
  2. votes comments
  3. votes comments
  4. votes comments