National Park Service via AP file
These wild pigs on Santa Cruz Island in California are part of a populaton that has exploded at the expense of the island's ecosystem, federal officials say.
updated 5/3/2005 7:37:57 AM ET 2005-05-03T11:37:57

Norm Macdonald rises each morning with the sun, grabs his .223-caliber rifle and slips into the passenger seat of a tiny, doorless helicopter for another day of shooting pigs.

As the chopper skims over rugged terrain, Macdonald scans dozens of simple fence traps he’s set up for the thousands of wild swine that have overrun this Southern California island.

When there are pigs in the traps — and there always are — Macdonald leans out and pumps two bullets into each animal: One for the heart and one for the head.

Each pig’s death brings conservationists one step closer to their goal of saving the tiny Santa Cruz fox, an endangered species found only on this 96-square-mile island off Santa Barbara. Experts believe it’s the best way to mend the island’s delicate ecological web, which was torn when domesticated pigs escaped from now-abandoned ranches as early as the 1850s.

Animal activists upset
The killings have angered animal rights groups and forced the National Park Service and The Nature Conservancy, which co-own the island, to explain why groups dedicated to protecting animals are instead paying $5 million to kill them.

Reed Saxon  /  AP
This Santa Cruz Island fox was bred in captivity and will live in a protective cage on the island until the pig population is eliminated.
“It’s not just about killing pigs, it’s about saving a native species,” says Lotus Vermeer, the conservancy’s project director for Santa Cruz Island. “What we’re choosing to do here is save biodiversity.”

Macdonald and his eight-man hunting team from the New Zealand-based Prohunt Inc. have started fast — killing in the past two weeks more than 800 of the island’s estimated 3,000 pigs. They expect the entire process to take more than two years, eventually incorporating trained dogs, infrared sensing devices and radio trackers.

More than 150 years of ecological chaos brought Macdonald here — and if biologists are right, the island’s future depends on his success.

“I think it’s going to take a couple of years at the end to make sure we got them all. The first 90 percent goes really quickly,” Macdonald says.

Cascading impacts
In 1853, the first ranch pigs broke into the wild and, within a few years, their population swelled to hundreds. Voracious scavengers, the pigs dug into hillsides as they foraged for bulbs and grubs, and snuffed for acorns under majestic oaks, tearing up the roots.

That triggered erosion, destroyed Chumash Indian archaeological sites that are at least 8,000 years old and encouraged the growth of nonnative plants that choked out scrubby oaks and grasses. Fennel, an invasive species, now grows so prolifically that on a hot day the air carries the plant’s licorice scent.

The National Park Service has in the past eradicated nonnative sheep, rats, rabbits and mules on other of the Channel Islands.

In the early 1990s, the fox began to disappear from Santa Cruz Island at an alarming rate.

Biologists concluded that golden eagles, attracted by the easy prey of piglets, had colonized the island — and also were feasting on fox. For years, the dominant and fish-eating bald eagles had kept the golden eagles away, but they were wiped out by DDT dumped off the coast beginning in 1947.

Foxes decimated
The fox population plummeted more than 90 percent, from more than 1,000 to fewer than 100 animals today. Last year, the federal government listed the fox as an endangered species.

The public park service and the private Nature Conservancy believe that only aggressive human intervention will save the fox.

Eradicating the pigs, their logic goes, will force golden eagles to search elsewhere for food, letting the fragile fox population rebound. To help that process along, biologists have relocated 29 golden eagles to the Sierra Nevada and also introduced 34 bald eagle chicks and bred 34 fox pups on the island.

Russell Galipeau, superintendent of the Channel Islands National Park, acknowledges that killing one species to save another puts his agency in an awkward position. The pig eradication, he says, fits his agency’s mission of restoring the island to its natural state while saving native species and protecting archaeological sites.

Relocation not allowed
Federal and state law prohibits relocating the pigs, which may have pseudorabies and cholera, to the mainland. For the same reason, the carcasses of the dead pigs will be left on the island to rot. Sterilization and contraception aren’t practical because the plan would fail if biologists miss only a few pigs — the fast-breeding pigs can rebound from a 70 percent population reduction in just one year, according to Galipeau.

Reed Saxon  /  AP
Russell Galipeau, superintendent of the Channel Islands National Park, stands next to a pig barrier fence, part of a program to eradicate the animals from Santa Cruz Island, Calif.
“I’m trying to protect the natural system — not what humans handed us, but what nature handed us,” he says. “Sometimes you have to do the same amount of disruption that damaged a place in order to restore it.”

Critics have argued that, after so long on the island, the pigs belong as much as the foxes.

One group, the Channel Islands Animal Protection Association, was formed in the mid-1990s after the National Park Service poisoned nonnative rats that were damaging vegetation on nearby on Anacapa Island.

In the current case, the association believes the golden eagles were attracted not by pigs but by the rotting carcasses of feral sheep from an earlier eradication program in the 1980s. They believe the golden eagles discovered the 4-pound foxes — not the pigs — and stayed.

“Not only was this story made up, but the pigs are now an established member of the ecosystem,” says association spokeswoman Scarlet Newton. “The public is being totally deceived.”

Vermeer says those claims are unfounded. “We have an immediate need on Santa Cruz Island,” she says. “It’s a small price to pay for preserving an island’s unique ecosystem.”

© 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


Discussion comments


Most active discussions

  1. votes comments
  2. votes comments
  3. votes comments
  4. votes comments