John Bazemore  /  AP file
Traffic is tied up in Atlanta, Ga., one of 51 U.S. cities where a study estimated that an average commuter lost 20 hours in travel delays in 2003.
updated 5/9/2005 12:45:33 PM ET 2005-05-09T16:45:33

If getting stuck in traffic makes you want to roll down your car window and scream, a new national survey released Monday has bad news: Gridlock is getting worse.

Congestion delayed travelers 79 million more hours and wasted 69 million more gallons of fuel in 2003 than in 2002, the Texas Transportation Institute’s 2005 Urban Mobility Report said.

Overall in 2003, there were 3.7 billion hours of travel delay and 2.3 billion gallons of wasted fuel for a total cost of more than $63 billion.

“Urban areas are not adding enough capacity, improving operations or managing demand well enough to keep congestion from growing,” the report concluded.

Honolulu became the 51st city in which rush-hour traffic delayed the average motorist at least 20 hours a year. The Hawaiian capital joins such congested areas as Washington, Atlanta, Boston, Chicago — and Virginia Beach, Va., Omaha, Neb., and Colorado Springs, Colo.

Building costs tens of billions
The report was released the same day the Senate resumes debate on a bill that would spend $284 billion on highways over the next six years.

But that’s not enough money to solve traffic problems, according to highway and transit advocates.

The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials estimated it would take as much as $400 billion in federal spending over the next six years to solve traffic problems, based on a 2002 study.

Roads aren’t being built fast enough to carry all the people who now drive on them, according to the Transportation Development Foundation, a group that advocates transportation construction.

The number of vehicle miles traveled has increased 74 percent since 1982, but road lane mileage only increased 6 percent, the foundation said.

Tim Lomax, a co-author of the Urban Mobility Report, said the soft economy and slow job growth in 2003 meant that congestion got worse more slowly than it would have during better times.

“The upside of a slowdown in the economy is the congestion didn’t get worse very quickly,” Lomax said.

Spreading out in some cities
In seven of the 13 major cities, the annual delay per rush-hour traveler actually went down slightly: Dallas, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Miami, New York, Houston and Philadelphia.

Lomax said that didn’t mean congestion improved throughout each area. It probably just spread out to the suburbs.

“In most of those places, delay actually went up, it just didn’t go up as fast as the number of people moving in went up,” Lomax said.

Only job loss or major commitments to expand capacity will decrease congestion dramatically, he said.

Refusing to build more roads and transit systems won’t discourage population growth, Lomax said.

Take fast-growing Austin, Texas, for example. In 1982, the average peak-hour traveler was delayed by 11 hours a year. That delay increased to 51 hours in 2003, the report said.

“Austin didn’t add transportation capacity in the ’80s or ’90s,” Lomax said. “The ’If you don’t build it, they won’t come’ philosophy didn’t work.”

Other ways to ease commute
Congestion can also be reduced by managing traffic better. The report said such techniques as coordinating traffic signals, smoothing traffic flow on major roads and creating teams to respond quickly to accidents reduced delay by 336 million hours in 2003.

Robert Dunphy, senior resident fellow for transportation at the Urban Land Institute, said that half of all traffic delays are caused by car crashes.

“There are huge benefits to getting in there and clearing accidents quickly,” Dunphy said.

Commuters also adapt, said Alan Pisarski, author of “Commuting in America” and a transportation consultant.

“People give up and go somewhere else,” he said. “Or else they’re leaving home at 6 a.m. or 9 a.m.”

© 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


Discussion comments


Most active discussions

  1. votes comments
  2. votes comments
  3. votes comments
  4. votes comments