IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.

GM, Ford among top in dependability survey

Almost every automaker made significant strides in vehicle dependability in a new survey, but GM, Ford and Toyota were among the top performers, J.D. Power and Associates said Wednesday.
Lexus, Toyota's luxury nameplate, was the top-performing brand in J.D. Power and Associates' vehicle dependability survey, with 139 problems per 100 vehicles.
Lexus, Toyota's luxury nameplate, was the top-performing brand in J.D. Power and Associates' vehicle dependability survey, with 139 problems per 100 vehicles.Toyota / Wieck
/ Source: The Associated Press

Almost every automaker made significant strides in vehicle dependability in a new survey, J.D. Power and Associates said Wednesday. General Motors Corp., Ford Motor Co. and Toyota Motor Co., the world’s three largest automakers, were top performers.

The closely watched survey, published since the late 1980s, measures dependability by questioning owners of three-year-old vehicles about problems they’re experiencing, such as wind noise or excessive brake wear. This year’s survey questioned 50,635 owners of 2002 model-year cars and trucks.

Chance Parker, executive director of product and research analysis at J.D. Power, said the industry showed a 12 percent improvement in this year’s survey. The industry average was 237 problems per 100 vehicles this year, compared with 269 problems per 100 vehicles in 2004.

Parker said manufacturers fixed a variety of problems in the 2002 model year.

“Almost every manufacturer got better this year, and we don’t always see that,” Parker said. “Manufacturers have already picked all the low-hanging fruit, so now they have to tackle every little thing.”

Lexus, Toyota’s luxury nameplate, was the top-performing brand with 139 problems per 100 vehicles, while Kia was the worst performer with 397 problems. Hyundai Motor Co. showed the most improvement, with 260 problems per vehicle compared with 375 problems in the 2001 model year.

Parker said Hyundai also improved dramatically when J.D. Power did its initial quality survey in 2002. That survey measures problems in new vehicles in the first 90 days of ownership.

“The 2002 initial quality survey is when we first saw a really big improvement from Hyundai, and that has translated into really high durability,” Parker said. “This seems to validate the progress they’ve made.”

GM had the winners in eight of 19 vehicle segments. The Chevrolet Prizm was the top-performing compact car, the Buick LeSabre was the top full-size car and the Chevrolet S-10 was the top mid-size pickup.

GM outstripped Ford, which had five segment winners, and Toyota, which had four.

Annette Clayton, GM’s North American vice president for quality, said strategies the company put in place five years ago to improve quality are paying off.

“Our quality is good, it continues to improve and now our customers recognize it,” Clayton said.

Parker said GM’s ranking may surprise some consumers who perceive poor quality at GM because of vehicles made in the past. Clayton said GM recognizes the problem and is working hard to overcome it.

“It takes time, and we have to earn it,” she said.

Several of the survey’s best performers — such as the Buick Century, Chevy Prizm and Ford Windstar — are no longer made. But Clayton and Deborah Coleman, Ford’s vice president of quality, said both companies have systems in place to ensure that future vehicles earn similar ratings.

“These improvements are process-driven more than product-driven,” said Coleman, who added that Ford was particularly proud that the Toyota and Mercury brands had similar ratings.

Parker said the appearance of the Toyota Prius on the list of top performers could help sales of hybrid cars because some consumers may have been wary about the long-term performance of those vehicles.

GM and Toyota also were the best performers in this year’s initial quality survey, which was released last month.

Parker said the initial quality survey typically gets more attention because people are interested in new vehicles, but dependability is extremely important because good performers will have more loyal customers and lower warranty costs.

“We’re always trying to make sure people understand that while dependability is not as sexy as the initial quality survey, at the end of the day it might be more important,” Parker said.