Image: Judith Miller
Mark Wilson  /  Getty Images
New York Times reporter Judith Miller arrives at court for a grand jury appearance with her attorney Bob Bennett on Wednesday in Washington, D.C. During her tesimonial, Miller disclosed details of her conversation with Dick Cheney's chief of staff.
updated 10/12/2005 2:49:01 PM ET 2005-10-12T18:49:01

New York Times reporter Judith Miller gave prosecutors details of a previously undisclosed conversation she had with Vice President Dick Cheney’s chief of staff, adding a new dimension to the criminal investigation into the leak of a covert CIA officer’s identity.

Miller testified for more than an hour before a federal grand jury, her second appearance before the panel. On Tuesday, she turned over to special counsel Patrick Fitzgerald notes from her June 23, 2003, contact with I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby and was questioned by prosecutors.

Miller's notes, according to a story published last weekend in the Times, refer to Bush administration critic and former U.S. Ambassador Joseph Wilson.

She and her lawyer, Robert Bennett, had no comment as they left the courthouse. Bennett said Miller had completed her testimony. Fitzgerald and the grand jury continued to meet for over an hour after the reporter departed.

Scrutiny on Bush administration
The prosecutors have been examining the roles of Libby, presidential aide Karl Rove and others in the Bush administration in the leak to reporters of the identity of Wilson’s wife, covert CIA officer Valerie Plame.

Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, in an interview on NBC’s “Today” show Wednesday, was asked why a person would be making an encore appearance before a grand jury.

Specifying that he was not discussing Rove or any other witness before this particular grand jury, Gonzales replied: “This prosecutor may have new information that may contradict prior testimony or may have questions about prior testimony, may simply seek a clarification. I’m not going to try to speculate what the motivation is behind Mr. Fitzgerald in asking a return by any witness. But there are a variety of reasons that someone might be called back to answer additional questions before a grand jury.”

Before the June 23 Miller-Libby conversation, the Times and The Washington Post had both anonymously quoted Wilson questioning the Bush administration’s handling of prewar intelligence on Iraq. On July 6, 2003, the Times published an op-ed piece by Wilson suggesting the Bush administration had twisted intelligence to exaggerate the threat from Iraq’s nuclear weapons program. Eight days later, columnist Robert Novak exposed Plame’s identity as a CIA officer, saying his information had come from two administration officials.

Miller never wrote a story about Wilson or Plame. She testified Sept. 30 about two conversations with Libby in the days after Wilson’s op-ed piece in The Times came out.

Times to publish story
The newspaper said in a memo to its staff that once Miller’s obligations to the grand jury are fulfilled, The Times intends to write “the most thorough story we can of her entanglement with the White House leak investigation. It’s a complicated story involving a large cast, and it has required a meticulous reporting effort — in part to chase down and debunk some of the myths kicked up by the rumor mill.”

The newspaper said the “story is incomplete until we know as much as we can about the substance of her evidence.”

  1. Other political news of note
    1. Animated Boehner: 'There's nothing complex about the Keystone Pipeline!'

      House Speaker John Boehner became animated Tuesday over the proposed Keystone Pipeline, castigating the Obama administration for not having approved the project yet.

    2. Budget deficits shrinking but set to grow after 2015
    3. Senate readies another volley on unemployment aid
    4. Obama faces Syria standstill
    5. Fluke files to run in California

The Times added that Novak has not disclosed the details of his grand jury testimony. Novak has refused to say whether he cooperated with Fitzgerald’s investigation.

Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, in an interview on NBC’s “Today” show Wednesday, was asked why a person would be making an encore appearance before a grand jury.

Specifying that he was not discussing Rove or any other witness before this particular grand jury, Gonzales replied: “This prosecutor may have new information that may contradict prior testimony or may have questions about prior testimony, may simply seek a clarification. I’m not going to try to speculate what the motivation is behind Mr. Fitzgerald in asking a return by any witness. But there are a variety of reasons that someone might be called back to answer additional questions before a grand jury.”

Jail time
Miller spent 85 days in jail for refusing to cooperate with Fitzgerald’s probe. She testified Sept. 30 before the grand jury after getting a waiver from her source, Libby, and after receiving assurances from Fitzgerald that questions would be limited to her conversations with Libby.

Presidential aide Karl Rove had conversations about Plame with Time magazine reporter Matt Cooper and Novak. Cooper also spoke with Libby about Plame.

Fitzgerald also is calling Rove for additional testimony. It will be Rove’s fourth appearance. The grand jury, which has been hearing evidence in the investigation for the past two years, is due to expire Oct. 28.

© 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Discuss:

Discussion comments

,

Most active discussions

  1. votes comments
  2. votes comments
  3. votes comments
  4. votes comments