Feedback
News

Immigration’s Absence from Debate Disappointed, Delighted Viewers

Immigration, the issue that has been an attention hog in much of this year's presidential race, was nearly absent from Monday night's presidential debate, to the disappointment of some who were counting on a blowout over it.

Donald Trump attempted to squeeze in tidbits here and there but they were never enough to ensnarl him and Hillary Clinton into the always contentious issue where they have starkly different views.

Birtherism to Stamina: Top Moments From Trump and Clinton's First Debate 3:44

The absence of immigration disappointed some but left others praising Clinton from keeping Trump from spending too much time on the issue that resonates with his supporters.

"If he had been able to stay o the immigration question the whole night ... I think that would have been friendlier territory for Trump to be debating on than whether or not Sean Hannity did talk to him about his opposition to the Iraq war and that Sydney Blumenthal was first to call into question Obama’s birth certificate," said Brent Wilkes, executive director of the League of United Latin American Citizens, which advocates for immigration reform.

Wilkes said Clinton was able to keep Trump from his "hysteria" over immigration even though one of the topics of the debate was national security.

RELATED: GOP Convention Opens with Hard Line on Immigration, Security

"From immigrant advocate perspective, Clinton was able to stop him from going off on immigration instead was able to get him on (other) terrain to effectively make him look stupid," Wilkes said.

But Greisa Martinez, advocacy director of United We Dream Action, the political arm of an immigrant advocacy group, blamed moderator Lester Holt and Hillary Clinton for a "missed opportunity to make the case for why Trump's deportation doctrine is dangerous and why providing relief for immigrants is right."

"Our community and the country deserves a robust and sober discussion about immigration," Martinez said in a statement.

The virtual absence of immigration, was an attempt to hurt Trump to some and a pass for him to others, according to some tweets:

Steve Camarota is the director of research for the Center for Immigration Studies, which supports greater restrictions on immigration. He said there is still time for it to be hashed out in the next two debates.

"It is a good issue for him (Trump) if presented in the right way and I think we would expect that in other debates and it should help him, but we’ll see," Camarota said.

Follow NBC News Latino on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.