IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.

Fed Chair Powell grilled on inflation, economy during confirmation hearing

Powell's renomination hearing comes just one day ahead of a key inflation reading that is expected to show a sky-high 7 percent annualized inflation rate.
Jerome Powell, chairman of the U.S. Federal Reserve, during a Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee hearing in Washington, D.C., on Nov. 30, 2021.
Jerome Powell, chairman of the U.S. Federal Reserve, during a Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee hearing on Nov. 30, 2021.Al Drago / Bloomberg via Getty Images

Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell was in the hot seat on Tuesday, testifying before the Senate Banking Committee in his renomination hearing. Coming just one day ahead of a Consumer Price Index reading that is expected to show a sky-high 7 percent annualized inflation rate, the hearing was dominated by the topic of fast-rising prices and how the Fed plans to respond. 

Powell indicated a willingness to raise interest rates and unwind other pandemic-era economic support programs as the central bank contends with rising inflation, but noted that rising wages at the bottom of the income spectrum are not currently a contributing factor.

Powell expects inflation to remain elevated “well into the middle” of 2022.

“We know that high inflation exacts a toll, particularly for those less able to meet the higher costs of essentials like food, housing and transportation,” Powell said, adding that the Fed’s goal now is to keep this high inflation from becoming entrenched. 

He reiterated his earlier-stated position that he expects inflation to remain elevated “well into the middle” of 2022, adding that normalization depends to a considerable degree on supply-chain relief. “That’s going to be a big part of getting inflation back down,” he said. 

After spending much of 2021 characterizing steadily building inflation as “transitory” — triggered by supply chain bottlenecks rather than more fundamental drivers — the Fed shifted its stance over the last few months and indicated a future trajectory that backs out much of the pandemic-era policy support it put into place to prevent a financial meltdown in March 2020. 

Powell acknowledged the unprecedented nature of both the economic shock dealt by the pandemic as well as the uncharted path of the recovery. “Monetary policy must take a broad and forward-looking view, keeping pace with an ever-evolving economy,” he said. 

In keeping monetary policy accommodative for close to two years after the Covid-19 pandemic hit American shores, Powell and other Fed officials had made the argument that it was necessary to keep rates low and backstop bond markets until the labor market recovered from its swoon. 

“Policymakers are concerned that if we go too hawkish too quickly, that’s going to pump the brakes on the economy when we’re still trying to get people into the labor market and reopen the services part of the economy,” said Brian Vendig, president of MJP Wealth Advisors. 

Now, with unemployment at 3.9 percent — albeit in the face of a historic shortage of workers and lagging labor force participation — Fed officials and Congress members are revisiting that rationale.

“The question would be, if 3.9 percent isn’t your target to start normalizing rates, then what is?” said David Bahnsen, chief investment officer of The Bahnsen Group.

“It was always a kind of soft definition and it’s changed from cycle to cycle,” said Ross Mayfield, investment strategy analyst at Baird. Even prior to the pandemic, Powell had often spoken of the need to adopt a more inclusive definition of what “full employment” entails.

“We’ve got an underrepresentation by race and gender, and those challenges continue to persist. And labor force participation, that’s a gap that has not been fully filled,” said Eric Freedman, chief investment officer at U.S. Bank Wealth Management. 

Despite the unprecedented economic disruption stemming from the pandemic, Powell has generally enjoyed bipartisan support throughout his tenure, but questioning could at times become heated, particularly from more left-leaning senators such as Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts. 

“I’m expecting her to not back down,” Bahnsen said, pointing out that targeting Powell could be a way for progressive lawmakers to define themselves in opposition to moderates in President Joe Biden's administration who favored renominating Powell. “The political tea leaves have moved,” he said.

While inflation is expected to dominate the conversation, other topics on which Powell could face questions include the state of banking regulation, rules and ethics pertaining to trading activities undertaken by Fed officials and whether or not the central bank’s dual mandate should be expanded to encompass broader issues such as racial justice and climate change. Powell referenced climate change in his prepared remarks to lawmakers, characterizing it as one of a number of “evolving threats” to financial stability.

Narayana Kocherlakota, professor and chair of the economics department at the University of Rochester, and a former president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, predicted that Powell also will be asked about Biden’s currently stalled Build Back Better spending package and the implications of that spending on the current state of inflation.

While even four rate hikes would only raise the average borrower’s minimum payment by a few dollars every month, many households are already struggling to stretch their dollars as prices rise.

“He is highly unlikely to make any explicit comments about ongoing debates about fiscal policy,” Kocherlakota said — but he expects senators to focus on the topic regardless, given the high political stakes for both parties in a midterm election year with GDP projected to slow.

While discussion of monetary policy can seem detached from the reality of ordinary Americans’ personal finances, paying more to service revolving debt is a reality to which borrowers should adapt, experts say.

“Obviously, the Fed raising interest rates this year will have definite ramifications for consumers,” said Ted Rossman, senior industry analyst at “Credit card rates are already quite high… and they’re probably headed higher,” he warned. While even a full percentage point increase — or, four rate hikes, in Fed-speak — would only raise the average borrower’s minimum payment by a few dollars every month, the cumulative burden of that debt can build, especially for households already struggling to stretch their dollars as prices rise. 

There are indications that Wall Street is beginning to worry, as well. After notching multiple record highs, markets have stumbled in recent days as investors digest the prospect that the Fed might tighten policy more aggressively or more quickly — or both — than anticipated. 

Goldman Sachs’ chief economist said on Sunday that he now expects four quarter-percentage-point hikes this year: One each in March, June, September and December. The Wall Street Journal on Friday reported that Thomas Barkin, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, said it was “conceivable” that the central bank could undertake its first rate hike as early as March. Barkin is not one of the Fed officials who votes on rate actions this year. 

“The market had been pricing in three rate hikes and we were still hitting all time highs,” Mayfield said. “I think the market could take it in stride” if a fourth rate hike was on the table, he said. The prospect of an outright balance sheet reduction, though, could be another story.  

Since the pandemic began, the Fed committed to buying billions of dollars worth of Treasuries and mortgage-backed securities every month, a program it recently announced plans to wind down. Fed-watchers were quick to point out, though, that this would leave the central bank with a vastly inflated balance sheet. The pace and timing of selling off those assets is a top concern for market participants. 

“I think that’s the thing to watch, the balance sheet runoff,” Mayfield said, adding that a combination of simultaneous tapering or rate increases in conjunction with bond-selling could spook markets. “If they get really aggressive on balance sheet runoff at the same time, I think the market might capitulate more.”

In response to a question Tuesday about whether the Fed would sell or just let securities run off its balance sheet, Powell said the committee had not made any decisions. He noted, though, that the current balance sheet is bigger, the duration is shorter and the economy is stronger than when the Fed undertook its post-Great Recession wind-down of quantitative easing measures.