NRSC targeting vulnerable Dems with recent Clinton comments

Today’s sign that the 2016 campaign will never truly end comes from the National Republican Senatorial Committee, who has released digital ads hitting vulnerable Democrats with recent comments by Hillary Clinton.

The ads, running against the 10 Democratic senators up for re-election in states won by Trump, feature Clinton explaining to a crowd in India that she lost in parts of the U.S. where Trump was able to appeal to voters nostalgic for a previous time.

“His whole campaign, Make America Great Again, was looking backwards,” Clinton says in the ad after a message accusing the 2016 Democratic candidate of calling voters in Trump country “backwards.”

“It wasn't helpful,” Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., one of the senators being targeted, said on MSNBC on Sunday.  “I think it was wrong how she put it. I think it certainly is being taken out of context, which -- but she knows things that you say are taken out of context. So for those of us that are in states that Trump won, we would really appreciate if she would be more careful and show respect to every American voter and not just the ones who voted for her.”


latest posts from The Rundown

Sherrod Brown touts 'dignity of work' in new ad

Ohio Democratic Sen. Sherrod Brown's campaign is out with a new ad praising the "dignity in work" and evoking his blue-collar message in his reelection bid.

In the new spot shared with NBC News, Brown is heard talking about the importance of treating American workers well over video of line cooks, teachers, barbers, electricians and other workers.

"There is dignity in work. Whether you collect minimum wage, punch a clock or earn a salary, your hard labor should pay off in fair wages and benefits, affordable health care, in overtime pay when you earn it," Brown says.

"Because patriotism demands investing in American workers. And if you love this country, you fight for the people who make it work."

The Brown campaign confirmed the new spot will be part of a new seven-figure buy starting on Tuesday.

The campaign already has more than $6 million booked on air from early September through Election Day, data from Advertising Analytics shows.

The spot exemplifies how Brown is looking to win again in a state in which he's served for decades, but one that  President Trump won by 8 points in 2016.

Democrats have sought to find a way to win back many of the blue-collar voters that Trump wooed away from the party in 2016, with some looking to red-state Democrats like Brown as an example. He's strung together a successful career in the state while leaning on his populist, pro-worker message that is front and center again in this reelection campaign.

Brown's campaign has made that pitch with issues like the economy and trade. Exit polls from the 2016 presidential race showed the majority of Ohio voters most concerned about the economy and a near-majority preferring Trump's economic message to Clinton's. That polling also found that 46 percent of Ohio voters said trade with other countries took away American jobs.

Renacci, Brown's opponent, has targeted the Senator's progressive record and has argued that Ohioans want a senator more in line with Trump. His campaign's first ad included video of Trump lauding Renacci during a February trip to Ohio and argues that Renacci "knows the Trump agenda works for Ohio."

Brown led Renacci by 13 points in a June NBC News/Marist poll of registered voters.

Tom Steyer announces $10 million get-out-the-vote effort

Tom Steyer, the former hedge fund manager now spending millions of his personal fortune on a push to impeach the president, announced a new $10 million drive aimed at turning out Democratic voters in the midterms.

Delivering what his "Need To Impeach" operation billed as a major announcement from Michigan on Monday, Steyer said the new infusion of money would go toward television and digital ads, and on-the-ground organizing of the thousands of activists who have signed on to his impeachment petition.

"The people we elect in November will enter office knowing that they won in part because the American people want this president held to account and they want a Congress that will stop posturing and will start to address our real problems," he said during the announcement.

Some prominent Democrats have questioned whether elevating the impeachment issue would only serve to galvanize dispirited Republican voters to turn out this fall. But the potential 2020 Democratic presidential candidate, who will appear in Iowa on Tuesday, appeared to be setting himself up to claim a share credit if the party succeeds in winning back the House this fall.

He said his grassroots campaign has already delivered results for the party, citing the election of Conor Lamb in Pennsylvania's GOP-leaning 18th district last March. He said four of five voters in the district who had signed his impeachment petition turned out in the election, double the rate of all Democrats. Steyer's Need To Impeach says it has 5.5 million members.

Vulnerable Senate Democrats embrace Trump's wall

Several vulnerable 2018 Democrats are signalling an openness to more funding for President Donald Trump's long-promised border wall, a way to both avoid a possible government shutdown and to show voters in their states that they can cross party lines on even the most hot button of issues.

The president has tweeted that he's willing to shut down the government over the issue in the next round of government spending negotiations this September.

Indiana Senator Joe Donnelly is up with a new ad bragging that he has voted three times to fund "Trump's border wall" and he told Politico last week that he's "fine with $3[billion], $3.5, $4 or $5" billion for the project in spending negotiations coming up next month.

And Donnelly isn't the only senator battling for his seat in a pro-Trump state who's bucking their party on the issue.

West Virginia Senator Joe Manchin would support $5 billion in border wall funding, a spokesman for his office told NBC News last week. And while fellow "Trump Country" Democrat Heidi Heitkamp allowed that the "devil is always in the details" of these spending fights, she said in a statement that she's "always supported increased and enhanced border security along" the Mexico border — "yes, wall funding as well."

"Shutting down the government is never the way to go," Heitkamp's statement continued, urging bipartisanship on the immigration issue.

Finally, a spokeswoman for Montana Senator Jon Tester told Politico that he "is willing to make responsible investments in manpower, technology, fencing and, in places, a wall. However, he has concerns about the cost of the wall to American taxpayers."

The emphasis this week comes as these red-state Democrats look to burnish their reputation among conservative votes. Both Manchin and Heitkamp gave pro-border security statements to the conservative Breitbart News last week.

These statements buck the position of Democratic Party overall and will likely frustrate party faithful who see the wall as a symbol of the immigration policies they oppose. But it may be a worthwhile price to pay if it means retaining crucial Democratic seats in the Senate.

But the push is opening the candidates up to criticism from Republican rivals who see the rhetoric as disingenuous. In Heitkamp's case, both the North Dakota Republican Party and the National Republican Senatorial Committee pushed back her by pointing to comments from 2017 when she said during a hearing that she wished "we could get beyond" a fully concrete wall across the border because no one brought in front of her Senate committee made such a recommendation.

"No matter how hard she tries, Heidi Heitkamp can't shake her liberal voting record," NRSC spokesman Michael McAdams said in a statement last week. "After continuously failing to support President Trump's efforts to crack down on illegal immigration and tough border security measures, North Dakotans aren't falling for Heitkamp's desperate campaign stunts."

Ex-Speaker Boehner stops by Iowa State Fair

DES MOINES, Iowa — Former Republican House Speaker John Boehner said that it’ll be a “pretty close call” for the GOP to maintain control Congress in the fall, and urged caution as President Donald Trump escalates his trade war.

"They've got their hands full," Boehner told NBC News.

Boehner unexpectedly turned up at the Iowa State Fair Friday, happening upon a former Democratic House colleague and now presidential candidate John Delaney as he addressed fairgoers. The Ohio Republican said he is 15 days into a 35 day road trip as he campaigns for the party ahead of the midterms.

As ever, Boehner was short in his answers, especially about the current political scene. Asked to describe the state of nation, Boehner simply offered: “It’s a little messy.” Asked how he would have fared as the House speaker under a Trump presidency, he simply said: “Fine.” He offered the same answer when asked how Speaker Paul Ryan has managed the job, and wouldn’t weigh in on whom should replace him after he retires this fall.

“I don’t have a vote. So we’ll let the members decide that,” he said.

But he did offer advice to President Trump just as he announced a new round of steel and aluminum import tariffs, this time on Turkey. “Let’s get this issue resolved,” Boehner urged the president. “Get to the table."

"I think I would do this a little differently. I always thought you caught more bees with honey than you do vinegar,” he said. 

After noticing Boehner milling about the crowd as he spoke, Delaney quipped: “I appreciate you coming out and supporting me, I really do."

Carrie Dann

Republicans outspent Democrats by 3 to 1 margin in contested special elections

This week's House special election in Ohio's 12th Congressional District only added to the extreme spending gap between Republicans and Democrats in contested special elections. 

The Republican Party and its major outside groups have now spent about $41.7 million during the key special elections this cycle, compared to $12.3 million in Democratic spending. 

How did we get that figure? 

We counted independent expenditures and coordinated campaign expenditures (and compared them with Advertising Analytics data) from the Republican National Committee, the NRCC, the NRSC and the two major super PACs affiliated with the House and Senate GOP (the Congressional Leadership Fund and the Senate Leadership Fund). In total, Republicans spent at least $41.7 million on the special elections in AL-SEN, GA-6, MT-AL, SC-5, KS-4, PA-18, AZ-8 and OH-12.

For Democratic spending, we included the Democratic National Committee, the DCCC, the DSCC, the House Majority PA, and Highway 31, a group backed by top Democratic super PACs that became the party's main outside-spending vehicle during the Alabama Senate special election. 

It's worth noting that the tallies of these expenditures — which include funding for spending on television and radio ads, mail and phone banking — don't capture the full amount of party investment in each race, since both parties also support candidates financially in other ways not captured by the FEC records, such as transfers to state parties, polling and field staff.

But the vast disparity shows just how much Republican outside groups were spending to help prop up their candidates in these specials, and how untenable that model will be for November. 

That dynamic is why Corry Bliss, the head of the Congressional Leadership Fund, issued a warning after the tight Ohio race calling on GOP candidates to shape up their fundraising. 

Carrie Dann

Kaine leads Stewart by huge margin in new Virginia Senate poll

Corey Stewart, the controversial Republican nominee in Virginia's Senate race, trails incumbent Democrat Tim Kaine by 23 percentage points and garners just 26 percent support from voters, according to a new poll.

The poll from the L. Douglas Wilder School of Government and Public Affairs at Virginia Commonwealth University found Kaine winning 49 percent support, with 26 percent for Stewart, five percent for Libertarian Matt Waters and 20 percent undecided.

Republicans despaired when Stewart, who is known for his vociferous defense of Confederate symbols and his caustic descriptions of immigrants, won the June primary to take on Kaine in what has traditionally been a swing state but has trended increasingly blue in recent years.

The poll shows that 66 percent of the state's Republicans back him, while 10 percent are backing the Libertarian candidate, three percent are backing Kaine (who was Hillary Clinton's running mate in 2016) and one-in-five is undecided.

While Kaine has been considered a shoo-in for reelection, the dismal numbers for Stewart may be particularly alarming for Republicans because of the impact depressed GOP turnout could have on the state's contested House races. The Cook Political Report ranks four seats in the state as competitive in November, including three held by incumbent Republicans.

And Virginia voters appear to be largely inclined not to send Republicans back to Washington, according to the poll.

Asked which party they would prefer to control Congress after the election, just 32 percent said the GOP, while 51 percent preferred Democrats.

The telephone poll of 802 respondents was conducted July 10- July 30 and has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.49 percentage points.

Kasich on Ohio special: Voters 'sent a message' to GOP

Republican Ohio Gov. John Kasich told NBC's MTP Daily that Tuesday's House special election in Ohio is a signal to the GOP that voters are fed up with the "chaos" and "divisions" of the Republican Party ahead of November's midterm elections. 

"There's no question that people sent a message to the party, to Republicans: 'Knock it off,'" Kasich said Wednesday. 

"The chaos, the divisions, kids being separated from their parents at the border, these crazy tariffs, 'we're going to take your health care.'"

Kasich endorsed Ohio Republican Troy Balderson in the race's final weeks, a move that put him on the same side as President Trump, his GOP presidential primary rival. The Ohio governor represented a large portion of the district during his stint in Congress and his blessing was seen as a key validator for moderate Republicans who share his criticisms of Trump.  

But Kasich admitted that neither Balderson or Democrat Danny O'Connor "really emerged," turning the race into "a vote on what people thought about Trump." And he warned that the Republicans have to run as more authentic candidates, even if that means disagreeing with the president.

"A lot of Republican women, they don't like this noise, they don't like this division," he said.  

"If you are losing college-educated women, if you are losing millennials, if you are losing minorities because you aren't getting much of that vote at all, you've got a problem," he said. 

Balderson remains ahead by more than 1,700 votes as of Wednesday, with thousands more provisional ballots left to count. NBC News currently pegs the race as too close to call because of those outstanding ballots. 

McCaskill, Hawley draw early battle lines in key Senate race

And they're off!

Not that Claire McCaskill and Josh Hawley weren't facing off against each other already, but last night's results made the match up official.

It also gave us a good sense of the early battle lines in this race, which promises to be one of the most hotly contested and closely watched of this midterm cycle.

A few takeaways from the candidates this week:

Hawley's gameplan is to keep hitting McCaskill

Much of Hawley's pitch during his primary night event Tuesday night was to paint Senator McCaskill as elitist, entrenched in DC, out of step with her conservative constituents, and "reflexively" in line with Democratic leadership.

When NBC News asked if he's "reflexively" in line with President Trump, who endorsed his campaign and has fundraised for him, Hawley replied that he will put his constituents first.

Throughout his conversation with reporters, Hawley flipped every question to a referendum on McCaskill for siding with Democrats instead of Trump and Missouri.

This is a state Trump won by more than 18 points, so Hawley is relying on that partisan message to keep the Trump coalition together. But Hawley may have a tough needle to thread while dealing with the administrations tariffs, which could be problematic to the state's agricultural sector.

Democrats happy with primary turnout

A flood of Democratic primary voters went to the polls on Tuesday in what Democrats believe could be a good sign about the party's enthusiasm.

More than 600,000 Democratic primary voters cast their ballots this year, compared to 320,000 in the 2016 Missouri Senate primary and 289,000 in the 2012 Missouri Senate primary.

Republicans also came out in force, but basically matched their 2016 turnout. So the big trend upward in Democratic turnout is notable here.

On the phone this morning with reporters, McCaskill saw that as a sign of good things to come: "I feel really good about enthusiasm on the ground" and that Missourians paying "really close attention...will ultimately benefit our side of the equation."

The Kavanaugh Supreme Court vote will resonate here

The upcoming Supreme Court vote puts Democrats from Trump country in a tough spot, something McCaskill admitted when she told reporters it's not a "political winner" of an issue for her.

McCaskill wants to make this race about healthcare (and opioids and drug pricing), but that also plays right into the Supreme Court debate that Hawley is itching to have.

Voters at Hawley's campaign headquarters on primary night all said that the Court is a big issue, and while that's from a pretty partisan sample, McCaskill won't be able to win Missouri with just Democratic support.

Carrie Dann

Republicans have little shot of forcing indicted congressman off ballot

Wednesday's insider trading indictment against New York Republican Rep. Chris Collins may cast uncertainty on his reelection bid, but it seems like Republicans have few options of forcing him off of the ballot. 

Collins is running in a heavily-Republican district, which could protect him from retribution at the ballot box. But even if the GOP wanted to cut and run, there's little the party can do to force him out. 

There's nothing in state law that could kick Collins off the ballot unless he agreed to step aside, even if he's convicted before November's election. 

And there are only three ways to be removed from the ballot — death, disqualification and declination. 

Disqualification only counts for things like residency and age requirements, not criminal charges or convictions. And declination, the candidate declining to run, faces a handful of deadlines which have mostly already passed. 

The one loophole is if the party can find another public office for him to be nominated for, he could accept that nomination and step down as the party's congressional nominee. But that's extremely unlikely, both because most filing deadlines are passed and Collins would have to agree to step down in favor of that lesser position. 

If that long-shot scenario were to play out — the GOP finding a spot on the ballot for Collins and the congressman agreeing to step aside — the state party would have the power to nominate a replacement. 

The bottom line is that while it's theoretically possible for Collins to be removed from the ballot, it would require convincing Collins to step aside and finding some local landing spot where the filing deadline hasn't passed. 

Michigan district poised to get two congresswoman in one night

Rashida Tlaib is likely to become the first Muslim woman in Congress with her victory in Tuesday's 13th Congressional District primary, but voters might have put up a speed-bump on her path to Congress. 

Tlaib won the primary in the heavily Democratic district that had been represented for decades by Democratic Rep. John Conyers until his resignation last year amid accusations of sexual harassment. With no Republicans on the ballot in the fall, she's a virtual lock to win the two-year term in November and join Congress in January.

But because Conyers vacated his seat, voters on Tuesday also had to pick a candidate to serve from Election Day until the end of 2018 in a special primary. 

That's where things get interesting. 

Detroit City council President Brenda Jones, who finished second in the regular primary, leads Tlaib by a narrow margin in the special election primary. And the race still hasn't been called. 

So if those results hold, Jones will be poised to serve less than two months in Congress before turning over the seat to Tliab in January, since there's no Republican in that race either. 

This kind of outcome is rare—voters in Ohio's 12th Congressional District avoided a similar problem earlier this year by picking the same candidates in both the special primary and regular primary to replace retired Republican Rep. Pat Tiberi. 

But it's not unheard of. 

Hawaii Democrat Neil Abercrombie served less than four months in Congress in 1986 after he won a special election but lost his primary to serve the full term, which was held on the same day. 

Abercrombie's political career ultimately recovered—he went on to serve nine full terms in the House and as the state's governor.