IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.

CT scans in ERs catch only 25 percent of strokes

/ Source: The Associated Press

The most common method of diagnosing a stroke in the emergency rooms catches only about one out of every four cases — far fewer than an MRI scan, which also was better at spotting the type of stroke, a U.S. government funded study showed.

The study led some experts, writing in the medical journal The Lancet, to declare that MRI scans should replace CT X-rays as the standard of care. The journal published the stroke study in Friday’s issue.

“This mantle should now be passed to magnetic resonance imaging,” wrote Dr. Geoffrey A. Donnan and colleagues at the University of Melbourne in Australia in an accompanying commentary.

MRI scans should be adopted as the new standard of care, wrote the doctors, while they also criticized governments and health care systems for their poor track record of assessing new technologies.

Time can "make a big difference"

However, others argue it’s not such a clear-cut choice. MRI results take more time, a delay that can prove deadly to a stroke patient, these doctors contend.

“The time delay between MRI and CT may be around 15 to 20 minutes,” said Dr. Joseph Broderick, chairman of neurology at the University of Cincinnati College of Medicine. “And in an emergency, 15 to 20 minutes can make a big difference.”

Broderick had no role in the study, which was led by Dr. Julio Chalela, of the Medical University of South Carolina. Chalela was with the U.S. National Institutes of Health when the study was conducted.

Chalela and colleagues examined 356 patients, of whom 217 were ultimately diagnosed with an acute stroke. Patients were scanned both by CT and MRI machines. CT scans are a type of X-ray, whereas magnetic resonance imaging uses powerful magnets instead of radiation to produce an image.

MRIs three times more accurate

The scans were independently interpreted by four experts, who had no other patient information. Based only on the MRI scans, experts accurately diagnosed acute strokes 83 percent of the time. Using the CT scans, however, they were right just 26 percent of the time.

The first few hours following a stroke are critical, since clot-busting drugs must be given within three hours to have a real impact. If they are given to the wrong patients, however, death or severe disability can result.

Strokes are the second leading cause of death worldwide, and account for approximately 5.5 million deaths each year.

CT scans are cheaper, faster

Though CT scans may lose out to MRI scans on accuracy, on issues such as time and money, CT scans are far ahead. Widely available in emergency rooms in all developed countries, CT machines are compact pieces of equipment that produce images in as little as two minutes. In comparison, MRI machines are large, coffin-like structures that require patients to lie still for up to 30 minutes. They are also unsuitable for patients with pacemakers, metal objects, or who may be pregnant.

MRI scans also cost significantly more than CT scans and require specialized technicians to operate them and to read the scans.

“The superiority of MRI in detecting stroke in ideal conditions is unquestioned,” said Dr. Lee Schwamm, an associate professor of neurology at Harvard Medical School. Schwamm was not connected to the study. But combined with a consideration of patient symptoms, he says that CT scans are just as effective in diagnosing patients in emergencies.

MRI scans may offer more detailed information, but such information hasn’t yet been proven to make a difference in patient outcomes. Experts say studies are needed to determine if MRI scans might save more lives than CT scans in emergencies.

Schwamm likens the comparison between the two techniques to the difference between FM and AM radio. “FM radio is better because it’s high-definition, and is great if you’re listening to classical music,” he said. “But sometimes all you need is the weather and the news, so AM is just fine.”

In the same Lancet issue, an all-stroke special, two other studies found that stroke patients treated in a stroke care unit have a better chance of recovery than if they were treated in a conventional hospital ward.