NASA, accused of censoring its scientists on global warming and the origin of the universe, pledged Wednesday to reform its policies to ensure "open and full communications."
The latest moves followed more than a week of revelations in The New York Times and on the Internet about internal tussles between NASA writers and researchers and the U.S. space agency's public affairs office at its Washington headquarters.
A key figure in the controversy, George Deutsch, resigned Tuesday. He had told NASA writers in an e-mail to refer to the Big Bang as a "theory" because NASA should not discount "intelligent design by a creator."
The Times and Scientific Activist blogger Nick Anthis reported that Deutsch, who worked on President Bush's 2004 re-election campaign, lied about his college degree.
"The theory that the universe was created by a 'big bang' is just that — a theory," Deutsch wrote in an e-mail on Oct. 17, 2005, which was obtained by Reuters. "It is not proven fact; it is opinion. Yes, the scientific community by and large may share this opinion, but that doesn't make it correct....
"It is not NASA's place, nor should it be, to make a declaration such as this about the existence of the universe that discounts intelligent design by a creator — the other half of the argument," the e-mail continued.
Most scientists believe that a monster explosion, the Big Bang, gave birth to the universe.
The e-mail appeared to conform to Bush's views on the debate over intelligent design and the theory of evolution, as he said last August: "Both sides ought to be properly taught ... so people can understand what the debate is about."
Resignation and reforms confirmed
NASA spokesman Dean Acosta confirmed Wednesday that Deutsch's resignation had been accepted, and added in an e-mail, "As we have stated in the past, NASA is in the process of revising our public affairs policies across the agency to ensure our commitment to open and full communications."
This was in line with a statement issued last Saturday by NASA Administrator Michael Griffin.
"The job of the Office of Public Affairs, at every level in NASA, is to convey the work done at NASA to our stakeholders in an intelligible way," Griffin wrote. "It is not the job of public affairs officers to alter, filter or adjust engineering or scientific material produced by NASA's technical staff."
‘Watered-down’ views on warming
Besides the question over NASA's description of the Big Bang, climate scientists and those who write about their work at NASA said reports on global warming were "constantly watered down" to minimize the connection to the burning of fossil fuels and other human-made pollution.
One scientist, James Hansen of NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New York City, was quoted as saying in a New York Times story last month that the Bush administration had tried to stop him from speaking out after he called publicly for reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases linked to global warming.
"They feel their job is to be this censor of information going out to the public," Hansen said in the Times article. Hansen told the Times that Deutsch was among those who had sought control over his statements, but characterized him as "only a bit player" in the controversy.
Reuters' efforts to contact Hansen were unsuccessful Wednesday.
Astronomer Phil Plait, who runs the Bad Astronomy Web site and blog, was incensed over Deutsch's actions.
"There are so many issues about the Deutsch affair that it's hard to know which one to be most outraged about," Plait told Reuters in an e-mail. "But I suspect that in the long run it's the culture of anti-scientific attitudes, the suppression of science, that's the most disturbing and the most damaging."
MSNBC's Alan Boyle contributed to this report.