IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.

U.S., Iraq starting work on long-term treaty

/ Source: The Associated Press

The United States and Iraq are opening negotiations in Baghdad on a blueprint for a long-term relationship, plus a narrower deal to define the legal basis for a U.S. troop presence, a Pentagon official said Friday.

Pentagon press secretary Geoff Morrell said the talks are scheduled to start Saturday.

Leading the U.S. negotiating team will be Ryan Crocker, the U.S. ambassador to Iraq. He will be assisted by senior officials from the Pentagon, the State Department and the White House's National Security Council.

Morrell said the U.S. expects a lengthy negotiation, with a goal of completing a deal by December, when the U.N. Security Council resolution that now governs the U.S. and coalition presence in Iraq will expire.

The process of negotiating a long-term deal with the Iraqi government has triggered criticism from some in Congress, in part because the administration's position is that the deal will not require congressional approval and in part out of concern that it might commit to a specific U.S. troop level.

Administration withholds specifics
Morrell would not discuss specifics of the U.S. negotiating position.

"Like in any negotiation, the to-ing and fro-ing that inevitably will go on will go on behind closed doors," he said.

Morrell said the deal sought by the administration "does not seek permanent bases; will not in any way codify the number of troops that will remain in Iraq; it will not tie the hands of a future commander in chief; it will not require Senate ratification, but we will make every effort to keep Congress apprised of progress in these talks."

The intent is to simultaneously negotiate two parallel agreements. One, known as a strategic framework agreement, would spell out the basis for a long-term U.S.-Iraqi relationship in the political, economic and security fields. Both sides see it as the basis for establishing a normal state-to-state relationship, enabling Iraq to function with full sovereignty.

The other would be what is known as a status of forces agreement, a standard arrangement that spells out the legal basis for the presence of U.S. troops on Iraqi territory and establishes the legal rights and obligations of the troops. The U.S. government has such deals with dozens of other countries.

Terrorism on the table
What makes the Iraq case more complex is the U.S. interest in continuing to pursue terrorist threats inside Iraqi borders. Crocker addressed the issue last month in an interview.

"I don't think al-Qaida is going to have gone away after this year, and we and the Iraqis are going to want to make sure we are able to pursue them, but questions of force levels and whatnot, those will be executive decisions by this president and by the next," Crocker said. "This agreement is in no way going to get into that executive decision prerogative."

The United States now has 159,000 troops in Iraq and is expected to have more than 100,000 by the time a new president enters the White House next January.

David Satterfield, the senior Iraq adviser at the State Department, told Congress this week the status of forces agreement is intended to provide "all necessary legal authorities and protections for our troops to continue to operate in Iraq." He said the two countries also will establish a separate strategic framework that will reflect "our shared political, economic, cultural and security goals and interests."

"Together, they seek an accord that both affirms Iraqi sovereignty and will permit the continued assistance of U.S. and coalition forces in that nation's progress towards full security and peace," he said.

Looking for Iraqi compliance
Defense Secretary Robert Gates has said he expects the Iraqi government to agree to a longer-term U.S. troop presence, although the Americans would be focused less on combat than they are presently.

"I would anticipate that there would be some modest level of U.S. troops in Iraq at the invitation of a sovereign Iraqi government for some considerable period of time," Gates said in India last week. "But it would be a fraction of what we have there now, and they would be there to participate in training and equipping of the Iraqi forces, helping them protect their borders, going after al-Qaida and that sort of thing."

While the agreements would not tie the U.S. to specific troop levels, officials do not rule out including some broad goals for the U.S. military presence there, reflecting the gradual transfer of security responsibilities to Iraqi forces.

A key negotiating issue for Washington is expected to be a desire to maintain U.S. military authority to gather intelligence and conduct counterterrorism activities, as well as ongoing combat missions.

Separately, President Bush met with Gates and members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff at the Pentagon on Friday. White House spokesman Gordon Johndroe said the topics included long-term budget planning. He said Bush will have more meetings with Gates and the service chiefs before Crocker and Gen. David Petraeus, the top U.S. commander in Iraq, come to Washington in April for a status report on the war.