IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.

'Hardball with Chris Matthews' for March 10, 7 p.m. ET

Read the transcript to the Monday show

Guests: Chris Smith, Susan Molinari, Gov. Jon Corzine, Chrystia Freeland, Linda Douglass, George Rush, Rick Hertzberg

CHRIS MATTHEWS, HOST:  Sex, crimes, and wire types—wiretaps, the governor of New York caught in a prostitution ring.  Will the decline of the Emperor‘s Club rule the Empire State?  Let‘s play HARDBALL. 

Good evening.  I‘m Chris Matthews.  Welcome to HARDBALL.  A political bombshell today in New York State.  Just after 2:00 today the news broke that New York Governor Eliot Spitzer was linked, that was the word, to a prostitution ring.  According to the FBI, Spitzer was client number nine of the ring.  A short time later Governor Spitzer himself apologized in a brief appearance before the TV cameras. 


GOV. ELIOT SPITZER (D), NEW YORK:  I apologize first and most importantly to my family.  I apologize to the public, whom I promised better.


MATTHEWS:  Will Spitzer have to resign?  And who decides?  And will he be prosecuted as a criminal?  We will cover all of the angles of this breaking news story tonight in just a moment. 

And later, sheer audacity, over the past few days the Clinton campaign has been pushing the idea of a dream ticket with Senator Barack Obama in the number two place as vice president.  There is only one problem with that magnanimous gesture, Obama is the front-runner right now in the race for president.  Hillary is the one over 100 delegates back in second place. 

Here is Senator Obama reminding her of that. 


SEN. BARACK OBAMA (D-IL), PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE:  I don‘t know how somebody who is in second place is offering the vice presidency to a person who is in first place.  I mean, I‘m just wondering.  I‘m just wondering because if I was in second place, I could understand it.  But I‘m in first place right now. 


MATTHEWS:  People have been waiting for that rejoinder for quite a few days now.  We are going to have more on that race for president, especially the Democratic fight between Obama and Clinton later in the program. 

But we begin, as we have to, with the blockbuster political news involving Governor Eliot Spitzer of New York and that prostitution ring.  MSNBC‘s political analyst Howard Fineman writes for Newsweek.  NBC‘s Andrea Mitchell is covering the Clinton campaign.  Patrick Healey covers politics for The New York Times.  And Tucker Carlson is my colleague on “TUCKER.”

Thank you, Tucker.  Let me go to Pat Healey.  Pat, you have been covering this governor for a while now.  How does this fit in with his M.O., if you will, politically? 

PATRICK HEALEY, THE NEW YORK TIMES:  It doesn‘t fit at all.  You know, he was elected last year.  The thing was, he came into office, that he would be this moralist crusader.  He would clean up sleazy Albany, you know, take out all the bad guys.  And he was cleaner than clean.  He was the guy who went after Wall Street, set these really high standards. 

The thing about Eliot Spitzer, though, a lot—his enemies said, is he always created the rules for himself.  You know, so a lot of people felt like he always overreached in his prosecutions, that he went beyond what he could do, and that he played sort of an ends justified the means game.  And I don‘t know if that translates to his personal life, but people up here are stunned. 

MATTHEWS:  Well, let me go to Andrea Mitchell.  It seems to me that he has a problem in that he has been a very courageous crusading prosecutor of prostitution rings, especially this big one operating out of Staten Island.  That does cause a little bit of a conundrum for him, doesn‘t it, when he appeals to the public for understanding. 

ANDREA MITCHELL, NBC CHIEF FOREIGN CORRESPONDENT:  I think it does.  And it creates the question of hypocrisy.  It is similar to other Republican sex scandals that have been homosexual which have raised the question not of private behavior, but of hypocrisy, of behavior that goes against their public statements and persona. 

And in this case, it is a heterosexual scandal but it goes against his crusading morality.  And that may be politically fatal.  This could be a case where he has to step down. 

MATTHEWS:  Let me go to Howard Fineman.  You have also been covering the governor.  It seems to me one thing that is going to pop out at people as they tune in the news right now is to learn the vast amount of money involved in this prostitution ring.  These clients, like the governor, were paying $5,000 an hour or more for time with these prostitutes. 

This is just going to—I think it is just going to amaze people, that this kind of deal-making is going on involving interstate trafficking. 

The governor had this prostitute go down to Washington to meet him at the -

apparently at a hotel in Washington.  We know the room number, we know the deal, and then argued over the price, which reached up into the $5,000 category. 

This was a quite deliberate action.  This wasn‘t a sailor out on a weekend. 

HOWARD FINEMAN, NEWSWEEK:  Well, Chris, one thing that impressed me about Spitzer when I went up to travel with him during his campaign for governor, was that this was a guy who grew up in a rarified world of wealth, who went to Princeton, who went to Harvard, and yet who played a very tough game in the grittiest parts of New York in terms of white collar crime, in terms of pursuing corruption as attorney general of New York. 

But the distance between the kind of life he apparently was living, the expense of it, the hypocrisy of it, the complications of it, the self-destructive nature of it, and the other life he was living as a politician and as a former prosecutor is just mind-boggling.  I must say that I sense when I was covering this campaign, I have been thinking back to that, that there was something about him that didn‘t quite up to—add up to his ruthless reputation. 

Yes, he was a ruthless guy.  Yes, he was a remorseless guy.  Yes, he even used allegations of sexual misconduct against Dick Grasso, who he was prosecuting for matters related to the New York Stock Exchange that had nothing do with sex, yet he went after Grasso on the sexual front so he that he—Spitzer was kind of a predatory guy. 

Yet, when I met him and when I traveled with him, I found a guy who didn‘t seem too happy doing what he was doing.  And I thought there was something there that I couldn‘t quite figure out, and in my role as an armchair psychologist covering politicians, I think this guy found himself trapped in a world that he had made for himself and that he really didn‘t like that much because he brought it down deliberately. 

This is a guy who used text messaging, who used phone calls, who knew about the Mann Act, which is about the interstate transportation of prostitution, he had to have known about all of that stuff.  And yet, he did it to himself anyway. 

MATTHEWS:  A cry for help perhaps? 

TUCKER CARLSON, HOST, “TUCKER”:  This is the least surprising story of the year as far as I‘m concerned.  It is always the moralists with the creepiest personal lives, it‘s always secular Bible thumpers that get into problems like this.  I think his—I‘m sorry about this story because I think his real sins took place in light of day in front of all of us. 

I think what Howard just said, going after Dick Grasso on his sex life, at taxpayer expense, was not germane to anything is an outrage and abuse of power, and nobody said enough about it.  I do think if Eliot Spitzer is brazen enough to text message all of this stuff and to have liaisons in Washington, in public basically, he is brazen enough to try and stick it out and hold on to his seat as governor. 

I don‘t think it is obvious that he resigns tonight.  Everyone is saying that.  That could just be his enemies talking.  He may pull a Clinton and gut it out.  And he may—it may work for him.

FINEMAN:  That is not going to happen.

MATTHEWS:  Speaking of Clinton, let me go to Patrick Healey of The New York Times.  Hillary Clinton, of course, got into something of a contretemps with our colleague Tim Russert over the question of whether Eliot Spitzer was correct to give drivers licenses to undocumented workers, illegal aliens, if you will.  That caused her so much trouble.  Apparently they got—the Clintons got him to back off. 

He also got caught trying to put a political opponent, Joseph Bruno, the senate leader in Albany, under surveillance.  I mean, this is strike three for this fellow, isn‘t it? 

HEALEY:  Yes.  He is not very popular up here, Chris.  I mean, it is.

MATTHEWS:  He is running about 30 percent in approval right now. 

HEALEY:  Yes, yes.  It is pretty low.  I mean, the Hillary people say that they are not going to call on him publicly or privately to resign.  They tend to think that, you know, he is going to go down on his own.  That‘s what a lot of members of the Hill are saying.  I mean, Monica Lewinsky is one thing. 

You know, paying a prostitute maybe on multiple occasions, you know, it seemed to be alleged, is another.  It is hard to see him—you know, see him hanging on.  But, no, it is true.  I mean, the drivers licenses thing blew up in his face, you know, the internal battles in Albany may not be well-known nationally. 

But in New York this is a guy that won in a landslide in 2006 and fairly quickly saw his approval ratings just plummet because he kept picking battles, taking people on, sometimes seeing enemies where they didn‘t really seem to exist.  And he just lost sort of friend after friend. 

MATTHEWS:  Andrea, let me ask you about Hillary Clinton—Senator Clinton of New York.  Of course, if you are a senator from a state and the governor of the same party, you have to have a working relationship.  You don‘t have to be soul buddies. 

He is, however, I have to remind people, maybe my sense of irony insists on it, a superdelegate, one of these people placed in a privileged position of ruling on whether the democracy in the Democratic Party is going in the correct direction, and if not, to correct it. 

Once again, I have to bring into question the prudence, the justice, the judiciousness of these superdelegates, their ability to think beyond mortal men.  Here is guy who had no judgment who is going to pass judgment on whether the voters of who vote in Democratic caucuses and primaries got it right?

MITCHELL:  Well, he is one of 756.  And he will be instantly replaced if he does step down by the lieutenant governor, who would be the second African-American governor to Deval Patrick. 


MITCHELL:  Let me make one other somewhat more substantive non-political point.  Right now the governor of the state of New York is a principal negotiator involving Wall Street, insurance companies, the hedge funds.  There are a whole lot of financial issues he has been involved in behind the scenes trying to negotiate some sort of stability for the markets. 

This is the worst possible time for the governor of the State of New York, Wall Street, the center of finance in this country, to be taken out. 

MATTHEWS:  Tucker, you—I know you are a libertarian in your philosophy generally.


MATTHEWS:  . although there are many exceptions to all rules here.  But do you think when he claimed in his statement this afternoon at 2:00 that this was a private matter, that he can hold that ground? 

CARLSON:  Absolutely.  I mean, I know I‘m alone in this.  I know everyone in the press—and no one in the press has a weird personal life, by the way, just so you know, but is jumping on him and pounding on him, and this is disgusting.  I think much of what Eliot Spitzer has done is disgusting and I have been a long-term critic of his. 

But I think this is one subject in which—not giving him a pass, but I think people are so uncomfortable about the details of it, the guy has got three girls and a wife.

MATTHEWS:  Suppose he is prosecuted, does it remain a private matter? 

CARLSON:  No, I mean, of course it is not.  There is nothing private about it.  It is public.  But I‘m just saying, he can get a pass to a greater extent—and by the way, this is a lesser problem than Monica Lewinsky.  These were pros.  Monica Lewinsky is a girl.  I mean.


FINEMAN:  Chris...

MATTHEWS:  Howard?


FINEMAN:  No, no, no.  My understanding is that if these prostitutes ever get to talk about what went on or if word leaks about what went on, that Eliot Spitzer isn‘t going to survive 24 hours in the piranha tank of the New York tabloid press.  He is just not.  He is going to get laughed out of Albany if nothing else. 

MITCHELL:  And there is always the interstate commerce issue.

MATTHEWS:  Go ahead, Andrea.

MITCHELL:  I mean, he is an attorney, a former prosecutor.  And there is the issue of transporting across state lines.  So even though, you know, traditionally our colleagues tell us that the johns, whatever you want to call them, are not prosecuted, in this case he may well be prosecuted. 

FINEMAN:  Well, he was not prosecuted—you know, they don‘t name him as a defendant here.  So they are not at this point accusing him of participation in conspiracy to violate the Mann Act.  But if—depending on how tough they want to get with him, they can. 


MATTHEWS:  We will see.


FINEMAN:  . the tabloids tomorrow will be pretty rough.

MATTHEWS:  We will see later on tonight, perhaps.  Howard Fineman, thank you.  Andrea Mitchell, thank you.  Patrick Healey of The New York Times, thank you.  And Tucker Carlson, my colleague, right here in front of me, thank you. 

Coming up, much more on the Spitzer bombshell.  And later, Senator Hillary Clinton trails Barack Obama in the delegate count.  But team Clinton keeps hinting that Obama could make a great number two running mate for her. 

Today Obama responded.


OBAMA:  I‘m not running for vice president.  I‘m running for president of the United States of America!




SPITZER:  Today, I want to briefly address a private matter.  I have acted in a way that violates my obligations to my family, that violates my or any sense of right and wrong.


MATTHEWS:  Welcome back to HARDBALL.  Joining me right now is New Jersey Governor Jon Corzine, who was originally scheduled to come on the show, and the only reason he‘s here, actually, is to talk about the Democratic race and the role of possibly calling a new Michigan and Florida primary.  We‘re going to get to that in a moment, really.

Governor, obviously, you‘re a governor.  Obviously, you‘re the next-door governor.  Your reaction to this bombshell that the FBI has picked up wiretaps on your colleague, the governor of New York, involved with a prostitution ring, and quite detailed information coming out about him and a liaison in Washington, crossing state lines, the whole routine.

GOV. JON CORZINE (D), NEW JERSEY:  Chris, I‘m like every other human being, stunned and shocked.  And the history of Eliot Spitzer and my relationship with him and what I know about him are completely at odds with what has been revealed today.  It‘s pretty shocking.  And you know, he‘s got a lot of—a lot of work to do to both get back in the right position with his family, and obviously, with the public.

MATTHEWS:  What‘s this going to do to New York state politics?  Can he save himself?  Can he stay in the job after this?

CORZINE:  It‘s a tough row ahead of him, but you know, he is a man who‘s dedicated his life to, I think, doing good things for the people of the state of New York.  He‘s made a big mistake.

MATTHEWS:  You know, here‘s what Senator Clinton said.  The senator from New York said she didn‘t want to comment right now, but her thoughts and prayers went out to him and his family.  Well, that was generous.  The question...

CORZINE:  I think that‘s right, though.  I mean, people go through these kinds of personal car crashes.  I think people have a lot of sympathy.  You know, when I look at Mrs. Spitzer standing beside the governor today, you can‘t have anything but compassion.

MATTHEWS:  Do you realize that this—well, you must because you became governor of New Jersey to sort of save the state from the embarrassment of the McGreevey administration, all that embarrassment, with him hiring a male lover and putting him in as head of security in New Jersey.  And now the adjoining state, two of these babies in a row?

CORZINE:  I think that there has been a lot of breakdown in public trust in general.  This is not unique.  We had a governor in Connecticut that went to jail.  There was a change of power in Ohio on a misdemeanor charge of a governor.  There are lots of things that have happened.  I think all of us in public life have to recognize that our own personal behavior ends up undermining the trust that people need to have in their political leaders.

MATTHEWS:  Let‘s talk about something you came here to talk about...


MATTHEWS:  ... and that‘s whether the Democratic Party can come through this tremendous—we have an economy—look at the Wall Street—look at the numbers down, the market—you‘re the expert—down 150 points today.  We‘ve got a war going on in Iraq, maybe another war in Afghanistan, maybe another war in Iran someday soon.  We‘ve got everything going down.  Medicare, Medicaid, health care, everything‘s in real problems, and the subprime problem.

CORZINE:  People‘s home prices are going down.

MATTHEWS:  Foreclosures.

CORZINE:  Gasoline prices are going up.

MATTHEWS:  Is the Democratic Party going to get its act together and finish out its primary season, all 50 states, let everybody vote and do this thing right so that their candidate has a good chance to be the change agent?

CORZINE:  Chris, I believe that‘s the exact right answer.  We should get our act together.  All 50 states should participate in that process.  They should do it in a disciplined way, where all voters have a chance to participate.  It‘s what Governor Rendell mentioned on “Meet The Press,” Senator Daschle reinforced at that point in time as an Obama supporter.  I think we ought to have all votes, including Florida and Michigan, count.

MATTHEWS:  Governor Spitzer‘s a superdelegate.  He may not be one by Denver in August.  But it just shows that superdelegates are people, too.  The idea that superdelegates are mightier and smarter and more judicious than the rest of us has obviously been misproven again.  Let me ask you this...

CORZINE:  I don‘t think superdelegates are the way to decide this.  I think...

MATTHEWS:  OK, you don‘t...


MATTHEWS:  ... should be by the voters.

CORZINE:  I think there are two standards I‘ll look at as a superdelegate.  A, the popular vote, what‘s the...

MATTHEWS:  Total national popular vote.

CORZINE:  What‘s the cumulative vote at the end of the day?  I‘m obviously going to pay attention to how New Jersey turned out.  But I think then the cumulative delegate count is also another element that you have to take into account.  But I think we ought to do that with all states participating.

MATTHEWS:  OK.  If we have a vote at the end of it—you‘re a superdelegate just like all the others—if after the end of this whole rigmarole at the end of June, after a new vote for Florida, a new vote for Michigan, it‘s all done, Puerto Rico, D.C., Democrats abroad, everybody‘s had their say—should the candidate who got the most votes be the nominee?  The most votes.

CORZINE:  The popular vote would be a very, very powerful statement in support of a given candidate.

MATTHEWS:  So, if the popular vote differs in terms of who the winner is, if Hillary wins the popular vote, Obama wins the delegate count, who do you vote for?  Who should the delegates vote for? 

CORZINE:  I will vote more than likely—there always can be circumstances that intervene...


CORZINE:  ... that nobody can anticipate.  We saw some things today that change the context of how you look at things. 

I think the popular vote is more important. 

MATTHEWS:  You know why?  Because the founder of the Democratic Party once said that his belief is that one—a one-vote majority is as sacred as a unanimous vote.  That‘s the fundamental belief of democracy. 

CORZINE:  Sounds like a Thomas Jefferson quote to me. 

MATTHEWS:  Well, it should.  And, by the way, he started your party. 


MATTHEWS:  Anyway, thank you. 


MATTHEWS:  Thanks for coming on, on a difficult night.  You didn‘t come on to talk about the problems of Eliot Spitzer, who has been caught in this racket, the prostitution racket.  He was wiretapped.  Apparently, they have his voice.  They have his text messages.  They have got a lot of evidence on him that they—he probably wishes they didn‘t. 

We are going to come back and talk to Dan Abrams, our legal colleague, about what kind of legal jeopardy the governor of New York faces, in addition to incredible pressure to quite. 

Political sex scandals, we are going to talk about the big one right now, when we come back, the one surrounding Eliot Spitzer of New York. 

You‘re watching HARDBALL, only on MSNBC.  


MATTHEWS:  Welcome back to HARDBALL. 

All eyes are on the governor of New York, Eliot Spitzer, in this prostitution scandal tonight.  The New York governor was picked up on a wiretap seeking the services of a prostitute named Kristen, according to court documents this afternoon.

Governor Spitzer apologized at a news conference, but where is this thing heading? 

Now for the legal side of the developing scandal, we bring in Dan Abrams, host of “VERDICT,” a new show that starts next week, “VERDICT WITH DAN ABRAMS.” 

Sir, it‘s a perfect time for you to launch a show.


MATTHEWS:  It‘s not a perfect time for Eliot Spitzer. 


MATTHEWS:  We were talking back in your office this afternoon about what happens to—they‘re called johns in the parlance, we all know, clients of prostitutions.  They get charged with pandering, solicitation.  What is the verb for taking advantage of a paid prostitute, a prostitute? 

ABRAMS:  Well, when you‘re talking about crossing state lines, as the allegation is here, that a prostitute was taken from New York to Washington, the verbs—the verbs include persuading, inducing, enticing, coercing, transporting.  Any of those could be potential crimes. 

And, look, most of the time, they don‘t charge the johns, be it in federal cases, be it whether they are transporting them, if it‘s just an individual person who went to a prostitute for services.  And that—that infuriates many women‘s groups, who say, wait a second.  Why are the prostitutes getting charged, and the johns aren‘t?

But when the john is the governor of the state of New York, and the case is being scrutinized the way this one is, I think that Eliot Spitzer could really be in some serious legal jeopardy, if all of these allegations are true. 

MATTHEWS:  The only time I hear about these—you don‘t really hear much at all about—at all about this up in Washington, where I live.  I know you hear about it in Hollywood in the scandal sheets, movie stars going to these high-paid prostitutes, these call girls, if you will.

But does the FBI normally investigate these—these companies, organizations? 

ABRAMS:  Look, not that often, in particular when you have got three prosecutors from the public corruption unit.  That‘s the unit that deals with the government. 


ABRAMS:  So, you know, it seems to me—it seems pretty clear that, at some point, they decided there was some level of—quote—“public corruption‘ going on. 

But how did they start this investigation?  Was it an organized crime investigation?  Again, we don‘t know that yet.  Very often, these prostitution rings are discovered in the context of another investigation, be it money laundering, be it racketeering, be it a mob investigation, and then they find them and move forward against them in the context of that. 

MATTHEWS:  How do these checks get written?  I mean, we‘re talking about $5,000 for assignation here.  This isn‘t credit card business.  This is—maybe it is. 

I mean, how...


MATTHEWS:  What‘s the—as Bob Woodward would say, follow the paper, follow the money.  Is this how they do it?  Can they—can they catch these people through just wire transfers, through credit cards, through—through check-writing, or what? 

ABRAMS:  Well...

MATTHEWS:  How do they catch them? 

ABRAMS:  Well, look, Eliot Spitzer allegedly did a number of things to avoid getting caught, avoiding a wire transfer, making sure he left the door open, et cetera, trying to try to be sort of as anonymous as possible.

But, ultimately, you know, you have got to take out money.  And, in fact, in the—in the charging document, it talked about the fact that this—this client number nine, who we now know to be Eliot Spitzer, was negotiating, in effect, saying, look, you know, I owe you some money.  I have got some credit here. 

And the person says, well, you‘re going to need some more cash.  He says, I‘m going to have to go to the bank machine, et cetera. 

So, there‘s no question that, at some point, his name in some form is down on their, you know, their—their list.  But there are ways to avoid paying with credit cards.  There are ways to try and pay in cash.  So, I think that that was the case here. 

MATTHEWS:  Well, it‘s so amazing.  I have never seen so much detail on a crime.  I mean, they have got conversations here between the governor and this prostitute all about details.  They have got discussions of their negotiations, as you say, over money.  They have the name of—the room number. 

ABRAMS:  How much she liked it or not?


MATTHEWS:  But the room numbers, how do they have—why are we getting all this information?  Who is feeding this to the press? 

ABRAMS:  Well, look, it‘s coming from the indictment.

And part of the goal in the indictment is to talk about each and every act that was committed. 


ABRAMS:  Again, this is not against Spitzer, this charging document. 

This is against the prostitution ring. 


ABRAMS:  And, as a result, to prove each and every element of the crime, they go through and they say, here‘s what we know.  Here was the crime that was committed.  It was client A.  There was money transferred.  There was discussions about money.  The person had an account there, et cetera.  It is clear it was about sex. 

They have to prove all these things. 

MATTHEWS:  Yes.   

ABRAMS:  And, as a result, they get pretty detailed. 

MATTHEWS:  Well, they are proven enough for the public already, Mr.


ABRAMS:  He‘s...

MATTHEWS:  And, luckily for you, sir, you begin this new program called “VERDICT.”  In fact, I just got it out of the movie store, by the way.  It was Paul Newman last time. 

ABRAMS:  Yes.  Well...

MATTHEWS:  This time, it‘s you, sir.  Congratulations...

ABRAMS:  Thank you. 

MATTHEWS:  ... on getting the Newman part. 

ABRAMS:  We‘re looking...


ABRAMS:  You know, we‘re looking forward to it. 

MATTHEWS:  Good.  It will be a great show.  “VERDICT WITH DAN ABRAMS” premieres next Monday night at 9:00 Eastern as part of our new lineup. 

Up next:  Some call it a dream ticket, but how will Hillary Clinton, trailing Barack Obama, get to put him on her ticket if she‘s coming in second?  Well, that‘s what—we‘re going to discover that when we come back.  We will have Obama‘s response to the proposal that he get second place on the ticket, when he‘s running first.

You‘re watching HARDBALL, only on MSNBC.  


MARGARET BRENNAN, CNBC CORRESPONDENT:  I am Margaret Brennan with your CNBC “Market Wrap.”

Stocks falling for a fifth straight day, with the Dow Jones industrials tumbling 153 points, the S&P 500 falling 20, the Nasdaq dropping by 43. 

Stocks sinking as oil surged again—crude oil gaining $2.75 in New York‘s trading session, closing at another record high of $107.90 a barrel.  That‘s after trading at a new intraday high of $108.21. 

Meantime, the Energy Department reports that the national average price for regular unleaded gasoline rose six cents over the past week, to a record high of $3.23 a gallon. 

Among the few bright spots—and we will leave you with one today—

McDonald‘s reporting a 12 percent increase in same-store global sales last month.  That was helped out by sales of coffee and new breakfast items, along with strong growth in Europe.  Shares of the fast-food chain rose almost 3 percent. 

That‘s it from CNBC, America‘s business channel—now back to Chris and HARDBALL. 


SEN. HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON (D-NY), PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE:  I think it‘s imperative that each of us be able to demonstrate we can cross the commander in chief threshold.  And I believe that I have done that.  Certainly, McCain has done that.  And—and you will have to ask Senator Obama with respect to his candidacy. 


MATTHEWS:  Welcome back to HARDBALL. 

So, again, why is Senator Clinton talking about a joint ticket with Senator Obama as her vice president if she doesn‘t think he‘s qualified for the job of president? 

Chuck Todd is NBC‘s news political director.  NBC‘s Andrea Mitchell covers the Clinton campaign.  And Chrystia Freeland writes for “The Financial Times.” 

I don‘t know, Chuck, but let‘s take a look at this response from Senator Obama today to start this segment off, because it looks like he is finally coming back with something of a roundhouse punch at this—well, this presumption that Senator Clinton can dictate who will appear as number two on her ticket. 


SEN. BARACK OBAMA (D-IL), PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE:  As I understand it, both Senator Clinton and President Clinton repeatedly talked about how I would be a great vice president. 



OBAMA:  I have won twice as many states as Senator Clinton. 


OBAMA:  I have won more of the popular vote than Senator Clinton. 


OBAMA:  I have more delegates than Senator Clinton. 


OBAMA:  So, I don‘t know how somebody who‘s in second place...


OBAMA:  ... is offering the vice presidency to the person who‘s in first place. 



MATTHEWS:  Well, let‘s go to Andrea Mitchell, who has been covering the Clinton campaign. 

Where do you get the chutzpah to offer the V.P. job to the guy who‘s beating you? 




MATTHEWS:  Not at all.  It‘s good old Yiddish.  And I do think it‘s only appropriate, particularly appropriate in this case. 

MITCHELL:  It is.  It is so astounding.

MATTHEWS:  Audacity is a good American word. 

MITCHELL:  The audacity of anything but hope. 

I will tell you, it‘s so striking, because it, first of all, is very offensive to a lot of Democrats.  A lot of Democrats view this as really a putdown, not so much a sly putdown, a real putdown, of the front-runner. 

Look, he‘s got—right now at least—more popular votes, as he put out—as he just stated, and he also has more delegates.  And, so, for her to suggest this at the same time—there‘s the internal inconsistency.  How can she suggest putting him on the ticket if the first threshold question of being on a ticket is being ready to step into the number-one job?  You have got to be ready to be commander in chief. 

And she has said that, while she has years of foreign policy experience, and so does John McCain, he‘s only given one speech.  That‘s her standard line. 

MATTHEWS:  This is, Chrystia, the Clinton specialty, redefining reality: “is is.”  “I won the New Hampshire primary, when I lost by eight points to Paul Tsongas.”  “I can declare reality.”

Can Senator Clinton declare the notion that she‘s somehow even-steven with Barack Obama in delegates right now, to the point where she can publicly discuss whether she might put him on her ticket or not?

CHRYSTIA FREELAND, “THE FINANCIAL TIMES”:  Well, I agree with Andrea that it is audacious and inconsistent.  But...

MATTHEWS:  Is anybody buying it? 

FREELAND:  But I think it‘s also quite brilliant, because, by doing this, what she does is, she holds out to a big part of the Democratic Party, which is really troubled by all this, which feels like, we have two fabulous candidates, why do we have to choose, and who are also really worried, if they choose Hillary Clinton, then they lose all of the Obama momentum, all of those young people who haven‘t voted before.

She‘s saying, look, guys, you don‘t have to choose.  You can pick both of us.  After all, it‘s my turn.  And this is going to help Senator Obama. 

MATTHEWS:  Right. 

FREELAND:  It will give him all the extra experience. 

MATTHEWS:  Meanwhile...

FREELAND:  I think it‘s a brilliant ploy. 

MATTHEWS:  But, meanwhile, Chuck, this scorched-earth policy continues.  Even as she is showing him this bouquet of possibility that he might be her running mate, the scorched earth goes on. 

And look at the numbers this weekend in the “Newsweek” poll.  For the first time, they are not—they are pretty much even, but, more importantly, John McCain has caught up to them, because her attacks on Barack have brought them both down, it seems, to McCain‘s level. 


And this is—you know, this was always the danger of where this fight goes out.  I mean, you look at the history in drawn-out delegate fights in both the Democratic Party and the Republican Party, and recent history shows, it doesn‘t matter who ends up with the nomination.  It‘s a loser by the time the general comes around, because you are concentrating all this fire on each other. 

More importantly, you have got Obama making negative—the negative messaging against Clinton, which is what McCain would use against Clinton, and, then vice versa, Clinton testing out new McCain talking points, when she‘s running against Obama. 

So, they are both doing almost the experimental dirty work of the RNC against each other.  And obviously, you know, the best stuff that‘s left over that doesn‘t quite work for the losing candidate gets used by McCain. 

MATTHEWS:  You know, Andrea, you and I have big Pennsylvania connections.  And I‘m telling you, when I poll—I have been polling on e-mail the county shares around the state, all across the state.  And one thing you hear: “I hope this fight doesn‘t get so dirty in Pennsylvania that it brings them both down.”

MITCHELL:  Well, that‘s what Ed Rendell was hoping.  He did not want to have these two very popular and very attractive, to different audiences, candidates fighting it out for six weeks in his state.  And now that‘s exactly what he‘s inherited. 

He was really put on the spot by Tim Russert on “Meet the Press” yesterday when he tried to defend how you could be inexperienced as commander in chief and yet be a viable vice presidential candidate.  He didn‘t really have an answer. 

Howard Wolfson, the communications chief for the Clinton campaign, was asked that same question today on a conference call, and he said, he‘s still not qualified to be commander in chief.  Well, then, how could he be the nominee?  He said, well, there‘s time between now and Denver before the convention.  So somehow Barack Obama is going to gain all of this foreign policy experience. 

MATTHEWS:  He has to win Howard Wolfson‘s respect.  Whoa.  Well, chutzpah does seem appropriate here, that they got the staff guy deciding whether he passes the test or not.  Which is—is that brilliant again? 

FREELAND:  I think Wolfson has actually been really effective at pursuing the kitchen-sink strategy. 

MATTHEWS:  Throwing it. 

FREELAND:  At throwing it.  And this whole NAFTA thing, for example, calling it NAFTA-Gate.  If you look at the Canadian news reports about it, it all actually started in a parliamentary lockup in Ottawa with a Canadian political guy saying Hillary Clinton‘s people were the ones that got in touch with us. 

MATTHEWS:  One of the ironies is they were, first of all, looking at a possible Hillary wink up there, that she wasn‘t going to go as far as her populist rhetoric. 

Here‘s Senator Obama taking on that commander-in-chief question today. 


OBAMA:  They have been spending the last two, three weeks—you remember, with that advertisement with the phone call, telling every—getting all the generals to say, well, we‘re not sure he‘s ready.  I‘m ready on day one.  He may not be ready yet. 

But I don‘t understand, if I‘m not ready, how is it that you think I should be such a great vice president?  Do you understand that?  I was trying to explain to somebody a while back the okey-doke.  You all know the okey-doke?  It‘s when somebody‘s trying to bamboozle you, when they‘re trying to hoodwink you.  You—They are trying to hoodwink you. 


MATTHEWS:  Let me go back to the politics of this with Chuck.  Do you really believe that the Democratic party will hold makeup Michigan primaries and Florida primaries paid for by the big-money people in the Democratic National Committee, by the money raised by Corzine and Rendell? 

TODD:  What‘s interesting here is take a look at who is saying they are going to raise the money.  This is clearly a Clinton strategy now, which is to come out now and endorse the revote.  Which is interesting for a couple reasons; one, it‘s an acknowledgement that Florida and Michigan aren‘t ever going to count, and that those results should be thrown out, because you have Clinton surrogates out there calling for a revote, saying they would fund it. 

The question is, will the Obama people be OK with this idea that it will be sort of a Clinton plan of how to do a revote, both in Florida and in Michigan.  You have complicated internal politics in Michigan, which—you know, between the UAW and the governor who don‘t get along.  It‘s not clear if they‘ll ever figure it out how to do a revote.  Florida, it seems, you got Bill Nelson out there almost out by himself—not every Florida Democrat is behind this mail-in idea, but in talking to some Florida Democrats today, they seem to think they can pull this off, and they seem to think they have no choice but to figure out how to pull out the mail vote. 

The question is: what does Michigan do and does Obama get put in a box if the Florida things happens.  He can‘t ever say he‘s against a revote if it actually happens.  But he‘s going to need Michigan.  He has a better shot of winning Michigan than he does Florida.  So then he‘s going to have to suddenly get behind an effort in Michigan to get a revote.  And the irony to all of this, Chris, is that the whole reason why the Clintons want Florida and Michigan to count has nothing to do with pledged delegates and has everything to do with super delegates, because right now the Florida and Michigan super delegates are thrown of.  If they get included, she will net 25 to 30 super delegates out of Florida and Michigan alone.  They have 53 between the two of them, which will probably be twice what she would net in tiny victories in Florida and Michigan. 

MATTHEWS:  There‘s no beautiful solution to this.  Thank you very much, Chuck Todd, Andrea Mitchell and Chrystia Freeland. 

Up next, much more on the bombshell in New York state, where Governor Spitzer has been picked up on a wiretap making use of a prostitution ring.  It looks like he‘s caught.  Should he resign?  The politics fix when we come back.  The big story—the Emperor‘s Club is the name of the call ring.  Should he rule the Empire State if he‘s in that ring?  This is HARDBALL, only on MSNBC.


MATTHEWS:  Welcome back to HARDBALL and the politics fix.  The round table tonight, Linda Douglass of the “National Journal,” Rick Hertzberg of the “New Yorker” and the “New York Daily News” columnist George Rush. 

Let me start with Linda Douglass.  Thank you for coming on.  Thank you all for coming on tonight.  Linda, you start, just when we thought we had a really good political story, which is this incredible story of how the Democratic nomination fight is going to end with Barack way ahead in votes and popular votes and delegates and states, and yet Hillary with the inside game mastered better than anybody, along with her husband, the former president, along comes this big story.  Just so we can all get a fix on the prudence and good judgment of super delegates, we‘ve got one here, the governor of New York, Eliot Spitzer, super delegate. 

His judgment is somewhat impeached now.  Can he survive? 

LINDA DOUGLASS, “THE NATIONAL JOURNAL”:  I was wondering how you were going to work all this together.  That was very good. 

MATTHEWS:  He‘s also a big Clinton alley, but he‘s not fair to say she had anything to with it.  She didn‘t, as far as I know.  That‘s her phrase.  I shouldn‘t use that all the time, as far as I know.  Of course, she had nothing to do with it.  He is a big ally, a big ally of the senators, and he‘s a big New York politician.  He‘s the biggest she can get.  Is this going to have ramifications.  Can he stand another day of this attention he‘s getting? 

DOUGLASS:  It‘s interesting that he didn‘t resign.  He‘s got to be wondering—presumably, if one believes the reports that are coming out of New York, he is going to resign, but a couple of recent politicians have weathered storms like this.  You had Senator David Vitter, who got caught with a prostitute of Louisiana.  You had Larry Craig; he famously of the men‘s room encounter with a man who said he was trying to toe tap or whatever he was trying to do.  And both of them decided to hang on and both of them are still holding their seats.

And one has to wonder if Eliot Spitzer figures, I‘ve got three years.  I can turn this around.  I can‘t imagine how he could.  He‘s not popular in New York now.  But one wonders if that‘s what‘s on his mind. 

MATTHEWS:  Let me go to George Rush of the “Daily News.”  I guess it‘s really come down to the shame, your ability to take shame.  Larry Craig has proven his ability to come to work every day and not care what anybody thinks.  It‘s a solemn universe he lives in.  He lives in an envelope.  Can the governor of New York live in an envelope, say, I don‘t care what you say in the press, I‘m sticking?

GEORGE RUSH, “NEW YORK DAILY NEWS”:  I think he can tough it out.  I think he‘s seen the president of the United States live through Lewinsky-gate, an impeachment hearing, and the governor is a pretty tough customer in his own right.  I think part of it may depend on whether this lady who he paid 4,300 dollars to, as Client Number Nine, may come forth with a lot of intimate details about what that encounter was like. 

So, if it starts to heat up and become more and more embarrassing, he may not be able to withstand it. 

MATTHEWS:  Rick, I was amazed at the amount of information we got on the first crunch.  It just comes in, details about the meeting, about the train trip.  He paid for this; he paid for her mini bar.  Do we need to know all this?  Somebody in the FBI‘s giving us everything here. 

RICK HERTZBERG, “THE NEW YORKER”:  You can‘t say he‘s exploiting cheap labor. 

MATTHEWS:  No, he‘s helping the economy of Washington, because he took her down there for this meeting. 

HERTZBERG:  The Sullivan Law.  Yes, but I don‘t think he can get through this.  When I heard his statement earlier, I thought, he‘s simply paving the way for his resignation.  He just wants to talk to his family first.  He wants to settle a few things.  I don‘t see how he can survive this. 

I mean, it was a victimless crime.  It‘s—it‘s a very different kind of crime from the kind of crime he was prosecuting as Mr. Prosecutor.  And it‘s a less serious crime, in my book, than stealing public money or fixing contracts or anything like that.  But for him, this just won‘t do, and it‘s different for a governor, too.  It‘s different. 

MATTHEWS:  George, the governor in his very brief statement, when he said, well, we‘ll get back to us and wouldn‘t take questions.  He said it was a private matter.  In New York State, will it be seen that way? 

RUSH:  I don‘t think it ever can be private.  I mean, you look back on the Giulianis‘ divorce and, sooner or later, all their filings come out.  It‘s—you know, it‘s a rough-and-tumble political world, where I think it‘s just a matter of time before allies of Spitzer will start accusing his Republican foes of, you know, somehow abetting this, setting up a honey pot or a honey trap or something.  And it‘s—I think privacy is an impossibility here. 

MATTHEWS:  Would he have prosecuted a guy of his weight politically? 

RUSH:  Oh, yes. 

MATTHEWS:  Well, that‘s a quick answer, George. 

RUSH:  Yes, well I think it goes without saying, after looking at the way he seized on those plane trips last summer, that if it‘s something this good, he‘s not going to let it pass, if the shoe were on the other foot. 

MATTHEWS:  I have to tell you, most Americans who live from paycheck to paycheck, who can‘t pay their heating bills, can‘t pay their mortgages, are going to be stunned at the sheer volume of money involved in these transactions.  Just morality aside, sex aside, 5,000 dollars an hour beats out some of our bigger lawyers in Washington, I think.  Linda, isn‘t that right? 

DOUGLASS:  Well, it is.  But I mean, I think, you know—yes, it was definitely a lot of money involved.  There was a lot of insane risk involved.  Again, you have to wonder about these high-profile, public figures, such as former president Clinton, given what he did—we were just talking about earlier—what were they thinking?  This was such a high-risk behavior for somebody who is paying money to a stranger who can make a lot more money by selling her story. 

But I think the crime here that may be unforgivable, and the political crime, of course, is the crime of hypocrisy.  I mean, here is a politician, Eliot Spitzer, who holds himself up as a person of great rectitude and honor and ethics, above many, many others.  I think more than anything else that is what‘s going to get him. 

MATTHEWS:  Well, that‘s over with. 

Anyway, we‘ll back with the round table for more of the politics fix. 

You‘re watching HARDBALL, only on MSNBC.


MATTHEWS:  We‘re back with the politics fix here and the round table.  Joining us now, of course, again is Linda Douglass and George Rush of the Rush column of the “New York Daily News.”  We all read that, even though we shouldn‘t.  And Rick Hertzberg of “The New Yorker.”

Rick, you led your piece this week in comment in the “New Yorker” about the fact that Hillary Clinton is spending millions of dollars, as you put it, dismembering Barack Obama.  He‘s spending millions to keep his limbs attached.  Is this going to go now from now until Denver, the convention? 

HERTZBERG:  It certainly looks like that way.  I don‘t know that it can.  That‘s four or five months off.  Four or five months of this?  I don‘t know if the country can take it.  I don‘t know if the candidates can take it?  But there‘s really—there‘s no sign that it will ease off, none. 

MATTHEWS:  There‘s no reason for it to stop if the Clintons have to catch up. 

HERTZBERG:  Not as long as she views this as totally a zero-sum game. 

He‘s a little more reluctant to look at it that. 

MATTHEWS:  In other words, if he goes down, she goes up.  She looks at it that way?   

HERTZBERG:  If he goes down ten points, she goes down five points.

MATTHEWS:  I only have ten or 15 seconds.  Linda, do you think this will continue, this scorched earth policy, right through the convention? 

DOUGLASS:  I think it will only because it‘s been working.  We see that the negative campaign against him did its job, as she expected.  Now people are waiting to see if he‘s tough enough to fight back. 

MATTHEWS:  I‘m looking for that, too.  That is a good question.  Thank you, Linda Douglass.  Thank you, George Rush.  Thank you, Rick Hertzberg. 

It‘s my honor now to say something about our beloved colleague Jennifer McNamara.  All these nights we‘ve been on up here in New York with these historic primary results, almost every Tuesday now, Jennifer was a proud member of our MSNBC team.  In fact, she‘s been a wonderful colleague in all the work we‘ve done here, night after night. 

Everyone says she had a good soul, that she is a good soul, who has left us after being the victim of a terrible vehicle accident on leaving our studio at Rockefeller Center.  Jennifer, thank you from all of us who will miss your smile and the soul behind it. 

Join us again tomorrow night at 5:00 and 7:00 Eastern for more HARDBALL, and tomorrow at 10:00 Eastern, I‘ll have special coverage of the Mississippi primaries.  Right now it‘s time for “TUCKER.”



Copy: Content and programming copyright 2007 MSNBC.  ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.  Transcription Copyright 2007 Voxant, Inc. ( ALL RIGHTS  RESERVED. No license is granted to the user of this material other than for research. User may not reproduce or redistribute the material except for user‘s personal or internal use and, in such case, only one copy may be printed, nor shall user use any material for commercial purposes or in any fashion that may infringe upon MSNBC and Voxant, Inc.‘s copyright or other proprietary rights or interests in the material. This is not a legal transcript for purposes of litigation.


Watch Hardball each weeknight