The is the subject of a lot of discussion on the Web. The conventional wisdom is simple enough to understand: The more armor the troops have, the safer they are, so anyone who cares about the troops, including the troops themselves, wants them to have more armor.
So we go to the Web to find what the conventional wisdom is leaving out. are pushing the fact that there was a in getting the question asked as proof that Rumsfeld was "set up." I'm not sure what that's supposed to mean as far as the actual armor issue, and frankly, the implication that the soldier and those who applauded the question were all under some kind of Jedi mind trick by the reporter is pretty offensive.
aren't crazy about the reporter's involvement but don't deny the importance of properly protecting the troops. What seems to draw the most resentment is the idea that some people are trying to make political hay of the matter. , "In short, unless you have suggestions on how to improve the armoring process, you’ve done nothing more than made an observation that was already made."
To that end, bloggers point to . (. I'm not sure if it qualifies as "political hay" or "suggestions," but at least we can guess who's going to show up on the Sunday talk shows this week.)
Of course, few have a stronger reputation for resisting the conventional wisdom than Glenn Reynolds. My one-sentence summary of is that armor isn't a magic solution, but good for Rumsfeld for taking a tough question.
: And if you think about it, you can have all the armor in the world on a tank and a tank can be blown up.
One more on this topic: There are already ??
Speaking of Jedi, here's at what's keeping your kid so quiet while playing that video game.
"The last time you played a board game you got the Adam’s apple caught in the funny-bone slot and then you couldn’t pass GO or collect $200." .
Yet another cool tool from .
"Federal safety regulators want 600,000 Dodge Durangos and Dakota trucks recalled because their wheels could fall off, but the auto maker , a company spokesman said." to me.
This comes from Media Matters, which is a liberal media watchdog, so it's basically their job to make the media look conservative, and conservatives look bad. That said, I'm not not sure if conservatives actually disagree with what's being said in the video, but the point is that it's meant to be fodder for an American liberal argument. What's particularly interesting to me is that the video isn't on the Media Matters Web site. Part of the reason why we do a daily video of the day is that online video propagates virally, by a sort of word of mouth, or in this case, word of link, so it's interesting to see what spreads through recommendation or discussion. In this case, I have to wonder if the people who view it through this site understand who Ann Coulter and Tucker Carlson are and the context of the shows the clips are taken from. Actually, even as an American I'm not sure I understand the context of the Wolf Blitzer segment. Doesn't that guy do news anymore?
Why ruin a with facts?
You might as well learn if they're going to be deciding what you see on TV. Afterall, as Americans, we validated their mission. Right?
In what's shaping up to be a banner day for turning conventional wisdom on its head, .
You decide the in America. Or you look at the list and lament the fact that you've never heard of these people.
A lot of folks are interested to see Howard Dean become the new chairman of the DNC, so it's no surprise that when he writes and essay .
What happens if you combine yesterday's cell phone cards ? (Flagrant F-word warning!)
Speaking of rage... There's an old riddle that asks, if convenience stores are open 24/7, why do they have locks on the doors? In what I would argue is the buried lead of the day, the question is extended to ask, why does a convenience store have locks on the doors if the clerk won't even close the store to take himself to the hospital for treatment of a ?!?!
(I should point out that almost every link I followed to this page was disagreeing with it in some capacity, reinforcing the point that link popularity does not equal endorsement of the views expressed by that link.)
Since the human race has managed to prosper in spite of , I'm starting to wonder if the creationists don't have a point.
Speaking of changing opinions... .
Blog history, . (Some of the parallels are uncanny.)
After a while one has to wonder if CBS has decided to make a marketing strategy of .
One more click... I don't know if you've been following the guest blogging David Kopel has been doing for Glenn Reynolds (), but he's done an interesting job of outlining the case for defending one's home and the Judeo-Christian foundations of self defense. Since he mentioned the debate taking place in the U.K. right now, I'm thinking he was inspired at least in part by the case of John Monckton. has further details on that specific issue.
If, as we learned yesterday, computers make people stupid, the effect of corporate workers spending their whole day on computers
Don't want to blame your beloved computer?
If only your brain had been raised .
This feels related:
There's a fuss over the put together by Madame Tussaud's in London.
why the Washington State Republican Party is showing up on blog lists...
Speaking of partisanship, wrote in a list of sites that show the political contributions of stores. Today I ran into another one. is meant to encourage Democrats to support stores that donate to Democratic causes. Insofar as it shows both red and blue retailers, I suppose just about everyone can find some use in it.
It certainly takes some of the effort out of the vote fraud conspiracies when the opposition candidate is .
If you don't get a you have to move to Canada. Here's your . ()
There's at least to Canadians that American travelers find less advantageous.
So far no wearing Canada t-shirts.
Breaking News: People don't crash into each other to tell them what to do.
I saw a comedian on TV the other day who told the story of being on a train and talking on his cell phone when someone interrupted him and told him he was in a designated quiet car. The comedian looked at his critic, "Then shut up." Maybe would have been more effective.
(If someone is giving instructions on how to do this, there must be some examples on his... .)
Alternate Commuter Click: If you printed up Monday's Commuter Click and are interested in following the theme, .
From mashing to moshing. Video of the day:
Earlier this week, was pushing the question of why Bernard Kerik left Iraq when he did, assembling timelines in a way that reminded me of how bloggers constructing the timeline of John Kerry's Vietnam service. I didn't really think much of the matter, but now I'm seeing he's not alone in his . I wonder if any of that will show up in his confirmation hearings?
Reporters "" on perceived honesty.
This week's points to .
CBS wants to promote its news programming through blogs, but it looks as though it . Tsk. That's just plain clumsy.
I ran into a lot of religion links last night. I'm tempted to try to unite them as some kind of Web dialogue, but with Hanukkah upon us and Christmas everywhere, the newsweeklies publishing issues , and the lingering question of the impact of religion on the outcome of last month's election, it's more accurate to list them as individual items that happen to fit a larger theme. Here's what I clicked:
Pastor Fired Over Sexual Exploitation Charges Update: That's . (This is the continuation of the Declaration of Independence hoax story we saw last week.)Today's Commuter Click from Digby with .And just this morning, Dave Kopel, filling in for Glenn posted an interesting .
. As someone who deals with a large quantity of public feedback, I find this story really interesting. How many mails does it take to represent significant public opinion? If most of the mails are part of an organized campaign, does that count? 500 people is a pretty meaningless number in the big picture, but try reading 500 angry e-mails and it feels like the whole world is on fire. As the Internet exposes individuals to the power of mass media, the question of perspective has yet to be resolved.
The vote fraud conspiracists are . Dan Brown, there's a Mr. Stone on the line for you.
Not to be outdone by the Weblogger awards, now the . And again, the awards themselves don't have a whole lot of meaning, but they do serve the useful function of highlighting blogs you may not already know.
When chat and instant messaging were first starting to really take off with kids, I thought for sure it heralded the start of a new era of hyper-literacy. What could be bad about so many young people writing and reading? Answer: ().
(What? Did you think Republicans would just sit around and wait for her to run first?)
Did you know there are parties in Iraq (and counting)? That's among the tidbits in the latest round-up.
Speaking of Iraq, here's the . I think it's an Iraqi music video.
Armstrong Williams tells an of a crisis at the NAACP. (Does that sound like I don't believe him? I don't doubt what he says, I just meant it works well as an interesting story even if you don't know or care about the NAACP.)
Speaking of tales: The rest of the Pat Tillman series:
I'm always impressed when I see a lot of people linking to a Meet the Press transcript. They're not very pretty and they're quite long. What drew the attention is the performance by the coming Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid. He showed himself to be a departure from milquetoast Daschle. He also said 'no way' to any privatizing of Social Security.
. Studies keep coming out and bloggers keep linking to them, but I'm not sure they do much to convince record labels who are still shaping the conventional wisdom that file sharing is killing music.
Following the developments of Le Monde's reader blogs ().
. But I reckon this one could also be called
It's hard to say whether from the space loving tech bloggers or the outraged DeLay bashers, but what strikes me about this story is that the bill passed on Nov. 20 and this story is only coming to light now. I don't blame the media, I blame our legislative process for being complicated and hard to access to the point of being opaque.
A significant theme I've run into in catching up from the weekend's links is the questions facing the West in how to deal with Islam.
As many Europeans , others question how to amid the threat of an apparently intolerant and potentially hostile immigrant minority. And just is that hostility?
That last link from Kevin Drum is a reaction to , which, in being too long to read off the screen but just right to print out and take a look at on the train ride home, is today's Commuter Click.
Part of the "Islam-watch" phenomenon is that all eyes are on Iran where seems like it could spark a revolution at any moment.
Don't expect that to be an answer to , however.
For some reason these two clicks feel related:
"I guess technically they aren't robots, but ."
, hopefully it won't be too rainy or windy.
I didn't click on any video worth sharing today, but that may be a problem of the past: ""
How about a video game of the day instead? Old favorite drifted back on the radar today, perhaps because of its winter theme. (.)
I'm seeing this guy Aubrey de Grey all over the place. I don't know if he has a book coming out or what. Also on my desk is a review copy of "," so this may be a sign that we can look forward to a lot of talk in the media about living forever (conveniently at a time when baby boomers are reaching an age when mortality is an increasing concern).
But enough about the future, 'tis the season to look backward.
- ( not among them)
- (It wouldn't be the Weblog awards )
- Rather than go on forever with "...of the year" links, may be all we need.
Speaking of backward:
,I am aware that my gay son may get his ass kicked by his hateful classmates at the upcoming school dance, and I'm fine with that. Regards,Parent
Further evidence that the concept of user generated content is coming into the mainstream media embrace: . (Réalisé avec le concours de . [I use , but it does sometimes struggle a bit with French.])
Playing right into the of many citizens of the Internet. (My first draft of this sentence said "anti-consumerist paranoia" but part of the point is that it's not paranoia anymore.) has some well formed (and linked) criticism, including a link to the reaction by science fiction writer/prophet .
It seems like I'm coming across the popular Boing Boing Weblog on blog lists more often lately. I'm not sure what the explanation for that is other than that some of the political blogs that were popular through the election are receding. What I clicked:
- Putting MSN's new "My Spaces" the . ()
- The of new Iraq torture photos
Speaking of Iraq, one of the more common recurring e-mails to our Letters to the Editor mailbox is the criticism that the Iraq bodycount does not include Iraqis. When he returned from Iraq, I asked NBC correspondent Chip Reid () why we didn't hear more about enemy dead from embedded reporters. He speculated that they were recovering the bodies overnight. Now, a year and a half later and at a very different phase of the war, many bloggers are pointing to a .
Perhaps the reason the U.S. has to engage in so much nation building is that there are in the world.
Speaking of nation building, many bloggers are captivated by the story of the surrounding the death of Pat Tillman. Some see it as a story of heroism and tragedy. Other's see it as an example of the media lapping up and repeating distorted stories from the Pentagon without question.
More nation building: are an important element of democracy.
James Taranto wants to see I would have thought Attorney General would be a better fit.
"Somewhere in the world, one of the thousands of passengers who passed through the airport will get a when they open their luggage." D'oh!
. This must be the healing we heard so much about.
"A white has been named the most influential modern art work of all time." (Next time, no free coffee for the judges while they consider awarding this prize.)