IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.

Are shark attacks more likely under a full moon? Study suggests lunar cycles may play a role

A study in Frontiers of Marine Science compared 46 years of data on unprovoked shark attack with moon cycles and found that fuller moons correlated with more attacks.

Unprovoked shark attacks on humans are rare and generally unpredictable, but a new study suggests they may be likelier under a full moon.

Researchers at the University of Florida and Louisiana State University say their study is the first to show any statistical correlation between historical shark attack data and a natural phenomenon — and it might guide future research into when and why sharks attack people.

Comparing moon cycle and shark attack data, the study suggests that "fewer shark attacks than expected only occurred at lower values of lunar illumination while more shark attacks than expected only occurred at higher values of lunar illumination."

But study authors Lindsay A. French, Stephen R. Midway, David H. Evans and George H. Burgess cautioned in the journal Frontiers of Marine Science that their analysis didn’t have enough historical shark attack data to draw major analytical conclusions.

The researchers acknowledged that the limited 1970-2016 date range for data in the International Shark Attack File doesn’t include records of every attack.

The study doesn’t suggest moonlight guides sharks toward humans, because the vast majority of shark attacks happen in broad daylight. And the study doesn’t suggest any causal relationship for the correlation; rather, it suggests two possible contributing factors: electromagnetic fields influenced by the moon’s phase and tides.

The study doesn't say it recommends using full moons to determine shark attack risks at this point, because local variables "are expected to continue to be more practical information for assessing risk."

"However, the results here strongly support the idea that moon phase does play a role in overall risk of shark attack, and if future studies are able to consider local and regional environmental conditions along with lunar illumination, both understating shark attacks and forecasting risk may improve," it says.

The International Shark Attack File reported 129 shark attacks in 2020 — 57 of which were unprovoked. Its report on last year will be released Jan. 24.

The 2020 report found that unprovoked shark attacks rose in the U.S. while they fell everywhere else. Fewer than 10 shark attacks a year are usually fatal, researchers said.

A California surfer and crabber survived bites from what were believed to be great white sharks last year, while fatal attacks at popular Australian beaches have occurred over the past several years.